done-blocked
Reusable reporting contract for any agent that hands work back to the pipeline.
Skill by avelikiy
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying done-blocked?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/avelikiy-done-blocked
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: documents, data, agent-building
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/done-blocked
Tools it pre-approves 3
From allowed-tools in SKILL.md: the agent may use these without asking you each time.
Read,Write,Bash
What's inside
- Skill name
done-blocked- Description
- Reusable reporting contract for any agent that hands work back to the pipeline. Forces ONE of two terminal statuses (DONE or BLOCKED) with a specific evidence shape. Stops vague "probably finished" and "kind of stuck" verdicts.
- License
- MIT
- Allowed tools
- Read,, Write,, Bash
- Instructions
- 95 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Pre-approves any shell command
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# DONE / BLOCKED Reporting Contract
Terminal status is exactly two states, and BLOCKED requires specific evidence — not vague obstruction reports.
## The contract
Every agent's final handoff line is one of:
```
DONE: <one-sentence summary of what shipped>
artifact: <path to report/PR/commit>
next: <who picks this up — pipeline stage, gate, or "pipeline continues">
```
```
BLOCKED: <one-sentence summary of the obstacle>
tried: <what was attempted — file paths, commands, error signatures>
failed_because: <concrete reason — not "unclear", not "complex">
need: <specific unblock — file access, missing config, CTO decision, another agent>
```
## Hard rules
1. **No third state.** "Mostly done", "done with caveats", "almost there" → choose. If caveats exist, the caveat itself decides:
- Caveat is cosmetic / P2+ → **DONE** (file a Beads bug, move on)
- Caveat blocks the next pipeline stage → **BLOCKED** (do not pretend)
2. **BLOCKED requires three fields.** `tried` + `failed_because` + `need`. Missing any field → the verdict is rejected and the agent must re-report. No exceptions for "obvious" cases.
3. **Silence is not DONE.** If the agent stops producing output without a terminal line, the parent / next stage treats it as BLOCKED with `failed_because: silent — no terminal verdict written`.
4. **`failed_because` must be concrete.** These are rejected:
- "environment issue" → say *which* command failed with *what* error
- "tests failing" → say *which* tests and the actual assertion message
- "unclear requirements" → say *which* decision is needed and the two options
- "not enough context" → say *which* file / doc / config you tried to read
5. **`need` names a specific unblock.** These are rejected:
- "more information" → ask one specific question
- "help from another agent" → name the agent (architect / security-officer / …)
- "CTO approval" → state the exact choice (approve gate X, pick option A vs B, waive check)
## Where the verdict goes
Every agent writes the verdict to **two places**:
1. **Last line of agent output** (visible to the orchestrator that spawned it).
2. **`.great_cto/verdicts/<agent>-<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS>.log`** — append-only audit trail.
```bash
mkdir -p .great_cto/verdicts
VERDICT_FILE=".great_cto/verdicts/<agent>-$(date -u +%Y-%m-%d-%H%M%S).log"
printf '%s\n' "$VERDICT_LINE" > "$VERDICT_FILE"
```
## Examples
**Good — DONE:**
```
DONE: CSO audit passed — 0 P0, 2 P1 findings filed as Beads tasks.
artifact: docs/security/CSO-2026-04-19.md
next: gate:ship ready for CTO approval
```
**Good — BLOCKED:**
```
BLOCKED: senior-dev cannot claim task BD-42 — circular dependency with BD-38.
tried: bd ready → BD-42 did not appear; bd dep tree BD-42 → shows BD-38 blocks BD-42, BD-42 blocks BD-38
failed_because: both tasks depend on each other transitively (BD-42 → BD-38 → BD-39 → BD-42)
need: architect to split BD-39 into two tasks so the cycle breaks
```
**Rejected — vague BLOCKED:**
```
BLOCKED: couldn't finish QA — environment problems.
tried: ran tests
failed_because: stuff broken
need: help
```
Why rejected: `tried` lacks command/path; `failed_because` is tautological; `need` is not actionable.
## Measuring the contract
`.great_cto/verdicts/*.log` is machine-readable. Weekly digest can compute:
- `DONE:BLOCKED` ratio per agent — too many BLOCKED from one agent = that role is under-resourced or prompt is unclear
- `failed_because` clustering — if the same reason appears 3+ times, that's a recurring obstruction worth a meta-fix (tooling, doc, skill)
- Silence rate (agents with no terminal verdict written) — should trend to zero
## Anti-patterns
- Writing both DONE and BLOCKED in the same report ("DONE but blocked on X"). Pick one. If you're blocked, the work isn't done.
- Using DONE as a politeness signal when the gate still fails. The verdict is for the machine, not the CTO's feelings.
- Writing the verdict only to stdout without persisting to `.great_cto/verdicts/`. The audit trail is what makes the contract measurable.From avelikiy/great_cto, MIT.
More from avelikiy/great_cto
- 0.776score
outcome-roadmap
avelikiy
Transform an output-focused roadmap (feature list) into an outcome-focused one.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
signing-preflight
avelikiy
Before the first commit of a session, check that commit signing will work — the key is loaded and unlocked — and ask the operator to unlock it once, up front…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
deploy-landed
avelikiy
Prove a deploy landed — the served revision is the commit you meant, its env is present, and the product does its job — instead of trusting the deploy…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
opportunity-solution-tree
avelikiy
Build an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to customer opportunities, possible solutions, and experiments.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code - 0.776score
quant-validation
avelikiy
The methods a financial-ML result has to survive before it is evidence — purged cross-validation with an embargo, triple-barrier labelling, sample uniqueness…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
brainstorming
avelikiy
Structured idea generation + multi-LLM debate for the product-owner stage.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code - 0.776score
aesthetic-instrument
avelikiy
great_cto's own committed aesthetic — the instrument panel.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
committed-aesthetic
avelikiy
How to write — and how to use — a skill that IS one aesthetic rather than a catalogue of them.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
migration-ready-schema
avelikiy
Data-model rules that make a schema importable from day one, so the migration-import-engineer is never blocked on missing columns.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
observability-baseline
avelikiy
Scaffold-time observability so a shipped product is not blind in prod from day one — error capture (Sentry), request-id structured logging, and /healthz +…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
lifecycle-messaging
avelikiy
Email/SMS lifecycle and deliverability framework for SMB Product-Builder products that send transactional or lifecycle messages (booking reminders, CRM…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code - 0.776score
skeptical-triage
avelikiy
Reusable 3-round self-challenge + arbiter pattern for filtering false positives from findings/verdicts.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 105
- Forks
- 13
- Open issues
- 5
- Last commit (this folder)
- May 28, 2026 (5 months ago)
- Last release
- Oct 23, 2026 (12 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/avelikiy/great_cto
- Website
- greatcto.systems
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from avelikiy
- 0.776score
aesthetic-instrument
avelikiy
great_cto's own committed aesthetic — the instrument panel.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
brainstorming
avelikiy
Structured idea generation + multi-LLM debate for the product-owner stage.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code - 0.776score
committed-aesthetic
avelikiy
How to write — and how to use — a skill that IS one aesthetic rather than a catalogue of them.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
deploy-landed
avelikiy
Prove a deploy landed — the served revision is the commit you meant, its env is present, and the product does its job — instead of trusting the deploy…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
lifecycle-messaging
avelikiy
Email/SMS lifecycle and deliverability framework for SMB Product-Builder products that send transactional or lifecycle messages (booking reminders, CRM…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code - 0.776score
migration-ready-schema
avelikiy
Data-model rules that make a schema importable from day one, so the migration-import-engineer is never blocked on missing columns.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get done-blocked running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
done-blocked skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/avelikiy-done-blocked (last updated 2026-10-24)