outcome-roadmap
Transform an output-focused roadmap (feature list) into an outcome-focused one.
Skill by avelikiy
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/avelikiy-outcome-roadmap
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/outcome-roadmap
Tools it pre-approves 2
From allowed-tools in SKILL.md: the agent may use these without asking you each time.
Read,Write
What's inside
- Skill name
outcome-roadmap- Description
- Transform an output-focused roadmap (feature list) into an outcome-focused one. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impact. Use when a roadmap lists features instead of results, when making a roadmap more strategic, or when communicating what success looks like vs what will be built.
- License
- MIT
- Allowed tools
- Read,, Write
- Instructions
- 113 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Outcome Roadmap — from features to results Converts a feature-focused roadmap into an outcome-focused one. **Core principle:** Teams build features, but customers and businesses care about outcomes. An outcome roadmap communicates WHAT CHANGES, not what gets built. --- ## The transformation formula For every initiative on the roadmap, apply: ``` Enable [customer segment] to [desired customer outcome] so that [business impact] ``` Examples: | Output (old) | Outcome (new) | |---|---| | Q2: Build advanced search filters | Q2: Enable customers to find products 50% faster through intuitive discovery | | Q2: AI recommendations | Q2: Increase average order value 20% through personalised recommendations | | Q3: Dashboard redesign | Q3: Help operators monitor all systems with 80% less time spent on dashboards | | Q3: SSO integration | Q3: Remove auth friction for enterprise admins so we can close 3+ enterprise deals | | Q4: Mobile app | Q4: Enable users to complete core workflows on mobile so 7-day retention increases from 20% to 35% | --- ## How to apply ### Step 1 — Read the existing roadmap If the user provides a roadmap file, read it. If they describe it verbally, extract the initiative list. For each initiative, ask internally: - What feature / project is planned? - **Why** are we building it? What changes for customers or the business? - What metric will improve, and by how much? - Is there a better, different way to achieve the same outcome? ### Step 2 — Rewrite each initiative as an outcome For each item in the roadmap: 1. **Identify the output**: What feature or project is planned? 2. **Uncover the outcome**: Why are we building it? Keep asking "So what?" until you reach real customer or business value. 3. **Rewrite**: Use the formula above. Include a metric if possible. **"So what?" chain example:** - "We're adding search filters" → So what? - "Users can narrow results" → So what? - "Users find what they're looking for faster" → So what? - "Users convert at higher rates because they find products before abandoning" ✅ That's the outcome. ### Step 3 — Group by strategic theme (optional) If the roadmap has 5+ items, group related outcomes into themes: - **Retention** (outcomes that reduce churn) - **Acquisition** (outcomes that improve conversion) - **Monetisation** (outcomes that increase revenue per user) - **Ops efficiency** (outcomes that reduce internal cost/time) ### Step 4 — Output format ```markdown ## Outcome Roadmap — <Product> <Quarter/Year> ### Strategic context <1–2 sentences on what the team is optimising for this period> ### Q<N> Outcomes | Initiative | Outcome Statement | Primary Metric | Target | |------------|------------------|----------------|--------| | <original feature name> | Enable [segment] to [outcome] so that [business impact] | <metric> | <target> | ### What we're NOT doing this quarter (and why) - <deprioritised initiative>: <reason — not enough signal / too early / wrong priority> ### Key assumptions - <assumption this roadmap depends on — if it's wrong, the outcomes change> ``` ### Step 5 — Validate Before presenting, check: - Every outcome has a measurable component (%, number, ratio, frequency) - "So what?" has been applied to every item — no pure feature descriptions remain - At least one "Not doing" item is stated — otherwise scope is unbounded - Outcomes align with stated OKRs or strategic goals in PROJECT.md --- ## Anti-patterns ❌ **"We will build X"** — that's an output, not an outcome. ❌ **"Improve UX"** — unmeasurable. Rewrite as: "Reduce time to complete checkout from 4min to 90sec". ❌ **Outcome without a metric** — if you can't measure it, you can't know if you achieved it. ❌ **Outcomes that require building a specific solution** — "Enable users to access features via mobile app" locks the solution. Better: "Enable users to complete core workflows on any device". --- ## Integration with pm agent When the pm agent receives a feature list without a PRD: 1. Check if the list looks like outputs (feature names) or outcomes (result statements) 2. If outputs → apply this skill to transform before decomposing into tasks 3. Pass the outcome statements into the PLAN doc as the "Why" for each task group
From avelikiy/great_cto, MIT.
More from avelikiy/great_cto
- 0.776score
opportunity-solution-tree
avelikiy
Build an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to customer opportunities, possible solutions, and experiments.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code - 0.776score
skeptical-triage
avelikiy
Reusable 3-round self-challenge + arbiter pattern for filtering false positives from findings/verdicts.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
deploy-landed
avelikiy
Prove a deploy landed — the served revision is the commit you meant, its env is present, and the product does its job — instead of trusting the deploy…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
observability-baseline
avelikiy
Scaffold-time observability so a shipped product is not blind in prod from day one — error capture (Sentry), request-id structured logging, and /healthz +…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
signing-preflight
avelikiy
Before the first commit of a session, check that commit signing will work — the key is loaded and unlocked — and ask the operator to unlock it once, up front…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
brainstorming
avelikiy
Structured idea generation + multi-LLM debate for the product-owner stage.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code - 0.776score
aesthetic-instrument
avelikiy
great_cto's own committed aesthetic — the instrument panel.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
committed-aesthetic
avelikiy
How to write — and how to use — a skill that IS one aesthetic rather than a catalogue of them.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
lifecycle-messaging
avelikiy
Email/SMS lifecycle and deliverability framework for SMB Product-Builder products that send transactional or lifecycle messages (booking reminders, CRM…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code - 0.776score
migration-ready-schema
avelikiy
Data-model rules that make a schema importable from day one, so the migration-import-engineer is never blocked on missing columns.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
quant-validation
avelikiy
The methods a financial-ML result has to survive before it is evidence — purged cross-validation with an embargo, triple-barrier labelling, sample uniqueness…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
vertical-onboarding
avelikiy
Onboarding-and-switching playbook for SMB Product-Builder products.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9
Compare and alternatives
Featured in
Signals
- Stars
- 105
- Forks
- 13
- Open issues
- 5
- Last commit (this folder)
- Sep 27, 2026 (1 month ago)
- Last release
- Oct 23, 2026 (4 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/avelikiy/great_cto
- Website
- greatcto.systems
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from avelikiy
- 0.776score
deploy-landed
avelikiy
Prove a deploy landed — the served revision is the commit you meant, its env is present, and the product does its job — instead of trusting the deploy…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
lifecycle-messaging
avelikiy
Email/SMS lifecycle and deliverability framework for SMB Product-Builder products that send transactional or lifecycle messages (booking reminders, CRM…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code - 0.776score
aesthetic-instrument
avelikiy
great_cto's own committed aesthetic — the instrument panel.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
brainstorming
avelikiy
Structured idea generation + multi-LLM debate for the product-owner stage.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code - 0.776score
committed-aesthetic
avelikiy
How to write — and how to use — a skill that IS one aesthetic rather than a catalogue of them.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9 - 0.776score
migration-ready-schema
avelikiy
Data-model rules that make a schema importable from day one, so the migration-import-engineer is never blocked on missing columns.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 105Claude Code +9
Cite this page
outcome-roadmap skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/avelikiy-outcome-roadmap (last updated 2026-10-24)