research-save
Create a verifiable handoff that preserves research continuity across sessions.
Skill by yhlai0911
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying research-save?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/yhlai0911-research-save
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: research
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/research-save
What's inside
- Skill name
research-save- Description
- Create a verifiable handoff that preserves research continuity across sessions.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 86 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- openai.yaml · agents/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Save Progress Use **continuity** as the leading concept. Hand over the live research state through verified pointers to canonical artifacts, not through a rewritten version of the project. ## Workspace resolution - Resolve `.research/config.yaml` per [writeback-protocol.md](../../primitives/research-workspace-contract/references/writeback-protocol.md). If it is absent, stop and recommend that the user invoke `research-setup`; do not invoke it yourself. - Before reading any other workspace artifact, resolve `canonical.context`, `canonical.decisions`, `canonical.claims`, `canonical.maps`, `canonical.briefs`, `canonical.workpackages`, `canonical.pilots`, `canonical.papers`, `canonical.proposals`, `canonical.reviews`, and `canonical.handoffs` from the config. Resolve relative values against the repository root and preserve absolute values. - Bind the resolved paths as `CONTEXT`, `DECISIONS`, `CLAIMS`, `MAPS`, `BRIEFS`, `WORKPACKAGES`, `PILOTS`, `PAPERS`, `PROPOSALS`, `REVIEWS`, and `HANDOFFS`. Read and write only through these bindings, except when updating an existing pointer field in the config itself. - Treat the setup baseline paths as defaults only, never as fallback targets. If a required key is missing, invalid, or has a file/directory type collision, stop as `blocked`; do not probe or write a default path. ## Guardrails - After path resolution, read `CONTEXT`, `CLAIMS`, and the active records in `DECISIONS`, `MAPS`, `BRIEFS`, `WORKPACKAGES`, `PILOTS`, `PAPERS`, `PROPOSALS`, and `REVIEWS`. - Verify artifact existence, status, and readback yourself. Ask the user only to decide the intended recipient, next objective, priority, and acceptable unresolved risk. - Never invoke another user-invoked skill. - Write the handoff only in `HANDOFFS`. Reference canonical artifacts; do not copy their full content. - Redact credentials, personal data, confidential reviewer material, and unnecessary sensitive content. ## Stage 1 — Pin the handoff target Establish who or what will resume the work, the next session's objective, and the point at which the handoff should be considered consumed. **Complete when:** the user confirms one recipient context and one next objective. ## Stage 2 — Verify the live state Inspect and classify: - last verified objective and current status; - settled decisions and their owners; - evidence claims and unresolved entailment gaps; - active map frontier or workpackage frontier; - completed outputs and their acceptance evidence; - blockers, failed attempts, and external dependencies; - pending user decisions; - exact checks, commands, or readbacks needed to continue. Distinguish verified fact, user decision, assumption, and inference. Use `partial` or `blocked` when evidence is incomplete. **Complete when:** every status statement points to a readable canonical artifact or is labeled as an unresolved assertion. ## Stage 3 — Compress by reference Create a concise handoff containing: - objective and why it matters now; - current verified state; - decisions already closed; - unresolved facts and decisions; - canonical artifact links; - frontier and recommended next action; - blockers and stop conditions; - verification commands or acceptance checks; - provenance timestamp and repository revision when available. - a context envelope: objective, immutable or canonical input pointers, allowed reads and writes, completion criterion, stop branches, and expected output receipt; - recipient or child task identifier when known, acknowledgement state, and the source versions it accepted. Do not duplicate briefs, maps, results, or draft prose. Link to them. **Complete when:** the handoff contains only the live thread that is not already represented by its references. ## Stage 4 — Read back and seal Write the handoff in `HANDOFFS`, read it back, and verify every local reference. Update an existing handoff only when it represents the same transfer; otherwise create a timestamped record. If the config already defines an active-handoff pointer, update that field in the config and read it back. Do not invent a parallel pointer schema. **Complete when:** a fresh agent can identify the next safe action, its inputs, allowed mutation boundary, completion criterion, expected receipt, and stop branches without the prior conversation. ## Register and verify For every terminal outcome reached with a readable workspace, write or update its canonical record through `HANDOFFS`, then register every created or updated current artifact or outcome in `CONTEXT` per the writeback protocol. Read back the handoff, every referenced local artifact needed to support its status, any updated config pointer, and `CONTEXT`. Resolve the index status against the handoff: `complete` when the handoff, its supporting references, and its row read back; `partial` when a usable handoff exists but external state or non-load-bearing verification remains; `blocked` when a load-bearing input, permission, path, or write fails. Domain-specific states stay in the handoff. ## Stop branches - Stop as `blocked` when canonical artifacts contradict each other or cannot be read. Recommend `$artifact-reconciliation` with both pinned artifact IDs; a handoff never chooses a winner or presents unresolved conflict as continuity. - Stop as `partial` when external state, results, or receipts cannot be verified. - Stop as `needs-decision` when no next objective or recipient context is agreed. - Never describe unverified work as complete, and never use the handoff itself as evidence that upstream work succeeded.
From yhlai0911/research-os, MIT.
More from yhlai0911/research-os
- 0.570score
artifact-reconciliation
yhlai0911
Resolve conflicting canonical research artifacts into one verified current state without erasing either intent or provenance.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
research-finance-social-science
yhlai0911
Review an empirical finance or social-science research design using domain-specific validity checks, when the user chooses this optional profile.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
research-auto
yhlai0911
Develop a topic, direction, problem, source, or partial idea through adaptive interviewing, evidence research, reviewer attack, and repair until it becomes a…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
research-5-run
yhlai0911
Claim and execute one eligible research workpackage with bounded authority, falsification gates, receipts, and readback.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
citation-audit
yhlai0911
Verify that citations exist, are primary where appropriate, and entail the claims they support.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.564score
writing-research-skills
yhlai0911
Design, review, and maintain predictable Research OS skills.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-status
yhlai0911
Show where the project stands on the mainline, what exists so far, and what the next action is.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-1-grill
yhlai0911
Interrogate a research idea one decision at a time until it is researchable.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-3-falsify
yhlai0911
Predeclare what evidence would kill the current research design before any expensive work begins.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-4-tasks
yhlai0911
Split a research brief into dependency-aware tracer workpackages.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-6-review
yhlai0911
Attack the current research design or draft as a skeptical journal panel and record every finding.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-map
yhlai0911
Map a multi-session research effort as decisions that progressively clear the fog.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Jul 27, 2026 (3 months ago)
- Last release
- Oct 19, 2026 (11 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/yhlai0911/research-os
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from yhlai0911
- 0.570score
artifact-reconciliation
yhlai0911
Resolve conflicting canonical research artifacts into one verified current state without erasing either intent or provenance.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
research-finance-social-science
yhlai0911
Review an empirical finance or social-science research design using domain-specific validity checks, when the user chooses this optional profile.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
research-5-run
yhlai0911
Claim and execute one eligible research workpackage with bounded authority, falsification gates, receipts, and readback.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
research-auto
yhlai0911
Develop a topic, direction, problem, source, or partial idea through adaptive interviewing, evidence research, reviewer attack, and repair until it becomes a…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
citation-audit
yhlai0911
Verify that citations exist, are primary where appropriate, and entail the claims they support.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.564score
writing-research-skills
yhlai0911
Design, review, and maintain predictable Research OS skills.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get research-save running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
research-save skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/yhlai0911-research-save (last updated 2026-10-24)