research-6-review
Attack the current research design or draft as a skeptical journal panel and record every finding.
Skill by yhlai0911
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying research-6-review?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/yhlai0911-research-6-review
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: design, research
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/research-6-review
What's inside
- Skill name
research-6-review- Description
- Attack the current research design or draft as a skeptical journal panel and record every finding.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 23 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- openai.yaml · agents/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Step 6 - Review > **Mainline step 6 of 6.** Open the first response by telling the user where they are. After review, the next step is a named repair gate or, only when readiness passes, a deliverable (`to-plan`, `to-proposal`, or `to-paper`). Lead with **reject**. The purpose is to surface the reasons a referee would decline, while repair is still cheap. Resolve `.research/config.yaml` and register every outcome per [writeback-protocol.md](../../primitives/research-workspace-contract/references/writeback-protocol.md). Run `$research-review` over the current canonical artifact. Keep contribution, theory, identification, measurement and data, evidence, and execution axes independent, and let the worst load-bearing axis control the verdict. ## Prerequisite This wrapper requires a current canonical artifact to review — a brief, plan, workpackage receipt, or draft. When none exists, stop with the exact prerequisite and recommend `research-2-brief`. It never repairs the design itself and never invokes another user-invoked skill. ## Report to the user For every major or fatal finding, give the axis, the reason a referee would raise it, and the smallest repair that would change the failed inference. Separate findings the user must decide on (scope, contribution, commitment) from findings the agent can repair without a decision. Return finding IDs, target locations, repair owner, evidence needed, acceptance test, and one concrete return route. Recommend `research-auto` for authorized integrated repair, `research-4-tasks` for bounded repair packages when a ready brief exists, or the named primitive for a narrow defect. Do not recommend paper production while an open load-bearing finding invalidates it. A completed review is not an accepted research design. Stop after the review report and its readback receipt. Do not rewrite the artifact to make findings disappear, and never let writing quality conceal a rejection reason.
From yhlai0911/research-os, MIT.
More from yhlai0911/research-os
- 0.570score
research-finance-social-science
yhlai0911
Review an empirical finance or social-science research design using domain-specific validity checks, when the user chooses this optional profile.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
artifact-reconciliation
yhlai0911
Resolve conflicting canonical research artifacts into one verified current state without erasing either intent or provenance.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
research-auto
yhlai0911
Develop a topic, direction, problem, source, or partial idea through adaptive interviewing, evidence research, reviewer attack, and repair until it becomes a…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
research-5-run
yhlai0911
Claim and execute one eligible research workpackage with bounded authority, falsification gates, receipts, and readback.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
citation-audit
yhlai0911
Verify that citations exist, are primary where appropriate, and entail the claims they support.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.564score
writing-research-skills
yhlai0911
Design, review, and maintain predictable Research OS skills.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-status
yhlai0911
Show where the project stands on the mainline, what exists so far, and what the next action is.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-1-grill
yhlai0911
Interrogate a research idea one decision at a time until it is researchable.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-3-falsify
yhlai0911
Predeclare what evidence would kill the current research design before any expensive work begins.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-4-tasks
yhlai0911
Split a research brief into dependency-aware tracer workpackages.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-save
yhlai0911
Create a verifiable handoff that preserves research continuity across sessions.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
research-map
yhlai0911
Map a multi-session research effort as decisions that progressively clear the fog.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 17, 2026 (17 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 19, 2026 (15 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/yhlai0911/research-os
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from yhlai0911
- 0.570score
research-finance-social-science
yhlai0911
Review an empirical finance or social-science research design using domain-specific validity checks, when the user chooses this optional profile.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
artifact-reconciliation
yhlai0911
Resolve conflicting canonical research artifacts into one verified current state without erasing either intent or provenance.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
research-5-run
yhlai0911
Claim and execute one eligible research workpackage with bounded authority, falsification gates, receipts, and readback.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
research-auto
yhlai0911
Develop a topic, direction, problem, source, or partial idea through adaptive interviewing, evidence research, reviewer attack, and repair until it becomes a…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
citation-audit
yhlai0911
Verify that citations exist, are primary where appropriate, and entail the claims they support.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.564score
writing-research-skills
yhlai0911
Design, review, and maintain predictable Research OS skills.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get research-6-review running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
research-6-review skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/yhlai0911-research-6-review (last updated 2026-10-24)