Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

code-review-checklist

Use this skill to review code with a focus on clarity, maintainability, simplicity, consistency, readability, project conventions and technical impact.

Skill by whosbea

IndexedMIT
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/whosbea-code-review-checklist

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Use this skill to review code with a focus on clarity, maintainability, simplicity, consistency, readability, project conventions and technical impact.

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/code-review-checklist

What's inside

Skill name
code-review-checklist
Description
Use this skill to review code with a focus on clarity, maintainability, simplicity, consistency, readability, project conventions and technical impact.
License
MIT
Instructions
44 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Code Review Checklist

Use this checklist when reviewing code.

## 1. Clarity
- Is the code easy to understand?
- Do names explain intent?
- Is there hidden or overly "clever" logic?
- Are there comments trying to make up for confusing code?

## 2. Responsibility
- Does each function, class, module or component have a clear responsibility?
- Is business logic mixed with infrastructure and presentation?
- Is there unnecessary coupling?

## 3. Simplicity
- Is there overengineering?
- Are there abstractions created before they are needed?
- Does the code solve the real problem, or does it try to predict an uncertain future?

## 4. Consistency
- Does the code follow the project's conventions?
- Does the structure match the rest of the codebase?
- Are there different styles for solving the same problem?

## 5. Errors and edge cases
- Are errors handled?
- Were null, empty and invalid cases considered?
- Do error messages help?

## 6. Maintainability
- Will the change be easy to modify later?
- Is there duplication?
- Is there a risk of regression?

## Expected output
Respond with:
1. Overall summary.
2. Critical problems.
3. Important improvements.
4. Optional adjustments.
5. Practical recommendations.

From whosbea/workflow-claude-codex-etc, MIT.

More from whosbea/workflow-claude-codex-etc

Signals

Stars
0
Forks
1
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Sep 24, 2026 (1 month ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from whosbea

Cite this page

code-review-checklist skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/whosbea-code-review-checklist (last updated 2026-10-24)