Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

code-review-and-quality

Review changes for correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance.

Skill by teknologist

IndexedMIT
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/teknologist-code-review-and-quality

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Review changes for correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use for /addy-review.

Use cases: security

Reviews

Write a review

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/code-review-and-quality

What's inside

Skill name
code-review-and-quality
Description
Review changes for correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use for /addy-review.
License
MIT
Instructions
13 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Code Review and Quality

Review in severity order:

1. Correctness and spec fit.
2. Test coverage and regressions.
3. Readability and maintainability.
4. Architecture, project conventions, and ADR constraints from the active plan/spec. Treat violations of linked ADRs, missing superseding ADRs, or skipped plan `must not` guardrails as review findings.
5. Security and performance risks.

Use concrete file paths and line numbers. If clean, say `No issues found` and state checked scope.

From teknologist/pi-addy-workflow, MIT.

More from teknologist/pi-addy-workflow

Signals

Stars
0
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
May 27, 2026 (5 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
Repository
github.com/teknologist/pi-addy-workflow
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026
Source
GitHubgithub-graphql

More from teknologist

Cite this page

code-review-and-quality skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/teknologist-code-review-and-quality (last updated 2026-10-24)