Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

DesignSpec

Write a formal design spec from brainstorming output or requirements.

Skill by N4M3Z

IndexedEUPL-1.2★ 4
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/n4m3z-designspec

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Write a formal design spec from brainstorming output or requirements. USE WHEN design approved, write spec, formalize design, spec document.

Use cases: documents, design, writing

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/designspec

What's inside

Skill name
DesignSpec
Description
Write a formal design spec from brainstorming output or requirements. USE WHEN design approved, write spec, formalize design, spec document.
License
EUPL-1.2
Instructions
56 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Agent Skills spec issues

  • name: only lowercase letters, digits and single hyphens allowed

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# DesignSpec

Produce a formal design specification from approved brainstorming output or direct requirements. The spec is the contract between design and implementation — Plan and DeveloperSprint consume it.

1. **Gather input** — read the approved design (from Brainstorming output or user description)
2. **Write the spec** — structured markdown covering all sections below
3. **Self-review** — run the checklist before presenting
4. **Save** — write to `docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md`
5. **User review** — present for approval. No implementation until approved.

## Spec Structure

Scale sections to complexity. Simple specs skip sections that don't apply.

- **Problem Statement** — what exists today, why it's insufficient
- **Proposed Approach** — what we're building, key design decisions
- **API / Interface Design** — public surface, data shapes, commands
- **Data Flow** — how data moves through the system
- **Edge Cases** — known boundary conditions and how they're handled
- **Test Strategy** — what to test, how to verify correctness
- **Out of Scope** — what this spec explicitly does NOT cover

## Self-Review Checklist

Before presenting the spec, verify:

| Check        | Question                                                   |
| ------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| Completeness | Could someone implement this without asking questions?      |
| Consistency  | Do all sections agree with each other?                     |
| Clarity      | Is every term unambiguous? No "should", "might", "maybe"? |
| Scope        | Does this solve the stated problem without gold-plating?   |
| YAGNI        | Is every feature justified by a stated requirement?        |

## Red Flags

| Thought                                      | Reality                                                        |
| -------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- |
| "The design is clear enough, skip the spec"  | If it's clear, the spec writes fast. If not, you need it more. |
| "I'll fill in the details during coding"     | That's not a spec, it's a wish list.                           |
| "Edge cases can wait"                        | Edge cases found during coding cost 10x more to handle.        |
| "The user already approved the design"       | Design approval is not spec approval. Write it down.           |
| "This spec is too short"                     | Short specs for simple problems are correct. Don't pad.        |

## Constraints

- Every section must be concrete — no placeholders, TBD, or TODO
- Spec must be saved as a file, not just presented in conversation
- User must approve the spec before implementation begins
- Hand off to Plan or DeveloperSprint after approval

## Sources

- <https://github.com/obra/superpowers>

From N4M3Z/forge-core, EUPL-1.2.

More from N4M3Z/forge-core

Signals

Stars
4
Forks
3
Open issues
8
Last commit (this folder)
Jul 13, 2026 (3 months ago)
Last release
Apr 16, 2026 (6 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
EUPL-1.2
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from N4M3Z

Cite this page

DesignSpec skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/n4m3z-designspec (last updated 2026-10-24)