Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

scientific-writing

Drafts, revises, and audits scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability…

Skill by K-Dense-AI

IndexedMIT★ 54,411
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/k-dense-ai-scientific-writing

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Drafts, revises, and audits scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter.

Use cases: testing, writing, research

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found
Runs as
Python package

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/scientific-writing

What's inside

Skill name
scientific-writing
Description
Drafts, revises, and audits scientific manuscripts or reports with explicit evidence provenance, reporting-guideline coverage, authorship accountability, confidentiality controls, and local consistency checks. Use for manuscript sections, references, declarations, tables, figures, or submission preparation when scientific accuracy and traceability matter.
License
MIT
Compatibility
Requires Python 3.11+ only for optional dependency-free local CLIs; core guidance is platform-neutral. Bundled tools are offline and require no API keys.
Metadata
version: 2.3 · skill-author: K-Dense Inc. · last-reviewed: 2026-10-01
Instructions
372 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Before installing

  • Ships executable scripts

Files (31)

  • SKILL.md
  • REPORT_FORMATTING_GUIDE.md · assets/
  • authorship_template.json · assets/
  • claim_evidence_template.csv · assets/
  • consistency_manifest_template.json · assets/
  • manuscript_manifest_template.json · assets/
  • manuscript_scaffold.md · assets/
  • reporting_coverage_template.json · assets/
  • reporting_guidelines.json · assets/
  • source_manifest_template.json · assets/
  • authorship_ai_confidentiality.md · references/
  • citation_styles.md · references/
  • cli_reference.md · references/
  • evidence_workflow.md · references/
  • figures_tables.md · references/
  • imrad_structure.md · references/
  • journal_policies.md · references/
  • professional_report_formatting.md · references/
  • reporting_guidelines.md · references/
  • research_integrity_open_science.md · references/
  • source_ledger.md · references/
  • writing_principles.md · references/
  • _common.py · scripts/
  • audit_claims.py · scripts/
  • check_consistency.py · scripts/
  • check_references.py · scripts/
  • lint_manuscript.py · scripts/
  • scaffold_manuscript.py · scripts/
  • select_reporting_guidelines.py · scripts/
  • validate_authorship.py · scripts/
  • validate_manifest.py · scripts/

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Scientific Writing

## Purpose

Produce clear scientific prose without inventing evidence or concealing uncertainty.
Keep drafting, evidence verification, and submission approval as separate stages.

The accountable human authors control scientific decisions and final approval. AI is
not an author, and generated fluency is never evidence [SW-S01, SW-S03].

## Non-negotiable safety rules

### Confidentiality

Do not send unpublished manuscripts, peer-review or editorial material, sensitive or
restricted data, PHI or other personal data, proprietary content, or source documents
to an external service without:

1. explicit authorization from a person or body empowered to grant it; and
2. a documented review of journal, institutional, funder, consent, ethics, contractual,
   legal, and data-use policy.

When authorization or policy is unclear, keep processing local and use only the minimum
metadata needed. De-identification requires expert review; removing obvious names is
not sufficient. See `references/authorship_ai_confidentiality.md`.

### No fabrication

Never invent or complete:

- citations, references, DOI, PMID, PMCID, ISBN, URLs, or quotations;
- results, data values, denominators, sample sizes, units, effect estimates,
  uncertainty, statistical tests, or significance claims;
- methods, materials, protocol details, software versions, analysis choices, or
  deviations;
- registrations, approvals, consent, ethics statements, participant details, or dates;
- authors, author order, CRediT roles, acknowledgments, or permissions;
- funding, sponsor roles, conflicts, data or code availability, or AI disclosures.

Use an explicit missing, unverified, or not-applicable state. Do not substitute plausible
boilerplate.

### Evidence binding

Every factual or numeric manuscript claim must map to verified evidence IDs. A human
verifier must open the source, confirm the proposition and locator, verify bibliographic
metadata, and record who verified it and when.

Search snippets, generated summaries, memory, and another work's bibliography may aid
discovery but do not verify a claim. See `references/evidence_workflow.md`.

### Scientific fidelity

- Preserve uncertainty and alternative explanations.
- Distinguish confirmatory, exploratory, descriptive, and post hoc work.
- Keep methods and results consistent.
- Reconcile units, denominators, sample sizes, populations, time points, and labels.
- For binary trial outcomes, report group event counts/denominators plus both absolute and relative effects with uncertainty when the reporting guideline requires them. Distinguish risk difference (percentage points), relative risk, and odds ratio; do not rewrite one as another or infer an absolute effect without the baseline risk. See [CONSORT 2025 explanation](https://www.bmj.com/content/389/bmj-2024-081124).
- Report negative, null, adverse, unexpected, failed, and inconclusive findings when
  they belong to the study record.
- State concrete limitations and bound generalizability.
- Do not convert association into causation or non-significance into equivalence.

## Intake

Before drafting, obtain or mark unresolved:

- document type, study design, stage, audience, and target venue;
- current author instructions and policy access date;
- protocol, registration, analysis plan, amendments, and reporting guideline;
- manuscript or section scope;
- verified source manifest and claim registry;
- methods, results, tables, figures, and supplements;
- authorship, CRediT, declarations, and approval records;
- confidentiality classification and authorized processing boundary;
- data, code, materials, and repository constraints.

Do not ask for restricted source material if metadata or a local user-run audit is
sufficient.

## Workflow

### 1. Establish the local workspace

For a new draft, optionally generate fail-closed Markdown, JSON, and CSV scaffolds:

```bash
python3 scripts/scaffold_manuscript.py \
  --output-dir ./draft-workspace \
  --document-id local-draft \
  --study-design randomized_trial \
  --guideline consort-2025
```

The generator never overwrites files. Its output is explicitly not submission-ready and
contains placeholders that the linter rejects.

### 2. Select reporting guidance

Choose by actual design and article type, then open the current official statement,
checklist, explanation document, extensions, and target-journal instructions.

```bash
python3 scripts/select_reporting_guidelines.py select \
  --study-design randomized_trial
```

Current major routes rechecked on 2026-10-01 include CONSORT 2025, SPIRIT 2025,
PRISMA 2020, STROBE, STARD and STARD-AI, TRIPOD+AI, CARE, ARRIVE 2.0, SQUIRE 2.0,
and CHEERS 2022 [SW-S06–SW-S18].

The selector is non-scoring. It does not certify quality, compliance, completeness, or
acceptance. See `references/reporting_guidelines.md`.

### 3. Build the evidence record

Assign:

- `E` IDs to sources in `source_manifest.json`;

From K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills, MIT.

More from K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

Signals

Stars
54,411
Forks
4,797
Open issues
8
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 1, 2026 (28 days ago)
Last release
Oct 1, 2026 (28 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

Version
2.3
License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from K-Dense-AI

Cite this page

scientific-writing skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/k-dense-ai-scientific-writing (last updated 2026-10-24)