status
Report where a work item sits in the lifecycle, what comes next, and what has drifted.
Skill by juangcarmona
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying status?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/juangcarmona-status
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: documents
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/status
What's inside
- Skill name
status- Description
- Report where a work item sits in the lifecycle, what comes next, and what has drifted. Read-only. Use when asking where an item stands or whether its gates have passed.
- License
- MIT
- Metadata
- author: juangcarmona · plugin: agentic-sdlc
- Instructions
- 65 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
## Purpose Diagnose a work item's position in the lifecycle and name the next capability. Read-only: mutates no state, no comment, no label, no branch. Input is a work item identifier. If omitted, infer it from the current branch; if that fails, ask. Available two ways. In the main session it is this skill. Where the raw tracker, branch, pull request and CI output would rather not enter the working context, the `flow-reporter` agent runs the same procedure in its own context and returns the report. ## When to use - Asking where an item stands and what to do next with it. - Checking whether an item's Ready or Done gate has passed. - Looking for lifecycle drift across the board. - Finding out what review debt exists. ## When not to use - Changing anything at all. Every mutation belongs to the stage that owns it. - Auditing the Done gate to decide whether a change may merge. That is `done-gate-auditor`, invoked by `implement` and `integrate`. ## Workflow 1. **Load the configuration.** Read `docs/engineering-lifecycle.md`. Absent means report that this repository has no lifecycle configuration and that `adopt` should run first, then stop. 2. **Read the item** via `read-work-item`, and its branch and pull request where they exist. 3. **Place it** against the configuration's stage-to-state mapping, and name what comes next: | Where it is | What comes next | |---|---| | Not yet refined | `refine` | | Refined, Ready gate unmet | `refine` again: the named dimensions are still open | | Ready | `propose` | | Planned, awaiting review | a human reviews the plan in the draft pull request | | Plan approved | `implement` | | In progress | `implement` finishes it out to the Done gate | | Done gate unmet | the unmet items, each with its lane and owning role | | Done, awaiting review | a human reviews the change | | Approved | `integrate` | | Merged | `review` | 4. **Report the Done gate's detail** where the item has reached implementation: read the existing evidence and the Done gate configuration, and list the unmet items with their lanes and roles. This is a read-only pass: read the evidence files the Definition of Done records, read the configuration, and report what is satisfied, what is unmet, and what was never verified. Do **not** run `verify-done`'s full workflow, which runs checks and captures runtime artifacts — that writes files and contradicts this skill's read-only guarantee. Where no evidence has been recorded yet, report that rather than running the checks to produce it. "Not done" is only useful with the list attached. 5. **Report review debt**: items merged on or after the retrospective baseline date in `## Label conventions` with no per-item retrospective at the configured path (default `docs/reviews/issue-<number>.md`). Earlier merges are historical, not debt. Naming the missing records is the whole job here; this capability never chases anyone. 6. **Flag drift** where the item's recorded state and reality disagree: an open pull request against an item still marked ready, a merged pull request against an item still in progress, a branch with no item, an item in progress with no branch. 7. **Report Fast Forward history** when `## Fast Forward` is enabled or a run record exists for the item. Read the configured evidence location and the work item's final integration comment where available. Report each matching run's ID and effective status, executor and reviewer models, commit reviewed, gate decisions, correction rounds, stop reason, and PR link. Treat an `awaiting-integration` record as complete only when the linked pull request is confirmed merged and the final completion comment matches its run ID. A review decision is valid only for the commit SHA recorded with that decision. Do not resume, edit, or repair a run record. ## Validation - Nothing was written: no transition, no comment, no label, no branch, no push. - The next capability is named explicitly, not left for the reader to infer. - A "not done" verdict carries the list of unmet items with lanes and roles. - Drift is reported as a finding, not corrected. - Review debt is reported even when it is empty. - Matching Fast Forward executions and independent review decisions are reported from durable evidence, or their absence is stated. ## Common pitfalls | Pitfall | Fix | |---|---| | Quietly correcting drift because it is obvious | Drift is a finding. A read-only capability that writes once is one nobody trusts again | | Running `verify-done` to produce Done gate detail | Read existing evidence instead. `verify-done` runs checks and captures artifacts, which writes files and breaks the read-only guarantee | | Reporting "not done" with no detail | Attach the unmet items, their lanes and their owning roles | | Leaving the reader to guess the next step | Name the capability. This is the discoverability surface for a seven-capability loop | | Invoking the capability it names | Reporting the next step is the job; taking it is the operator's | | Reporting what should be true rather than what is | Read the tracker, the branch and the pull request, and report those |
From juangcarmona/agent-toolkit, MIT.
More from juangcarmona/agent-toolkit
- 0.570score
adopt
juangcarmona
Bootstrap, reconcile, or explicitly reset a project's lifecycle configuration to the shared defaults.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
adr
juangcarmona
Draft and maintain Architecture Decision Records from maintainer-supplied decisions and repository evidence.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
architecture-docs
juangcarmona
Create, review, and maintain evidence-grounded arc42 architecture documentation from implementation evidence, ADRs, and product intent.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
propose
juangcarmona
Turn a ready work item into a reviewable solution design with tasks and test impact, raised as a draft pull request.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
review
juangcarmona
Learn from a merged cycle: record what happened with measured effort and route the lessons into the process itself.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
review-entry
juangcarmona
Create one dated, per-work-item retrospective after a change has merged: what worked, what did not, what to change next time, and sourced effort figures.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
harden-process
juangcarmona
Turn one concrete failure into the smallest durable guard in the process itself.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
implement
juangcarmona
Apply the approved plan on its branch, verify the change against the Definition of Done in both lanes, and mark the pull request ready for review.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
integrate
juangcarmona
Land an approved change: enforce the Done gate, fold in the specifications, archive the plan, merge, and close the loop in the tracker.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
ff
juangcarmona
Run the configured development lifecycle end to end with bounded, independent agent reviews and durable evidence.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.553score
plan
juangcarmona
Plan a refined work item using the lifecycle's existing proposal workflow.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.529score
document-to-markdown
juangcarmona
Convert Word (.doc, .docx), PowerPoint (.ppt, .pptx), Excel (.xls, .xlsx), OpenDocument (.odt, .ods, .odp), RTF, EPUB, CSV, and PDF files to GitHub-Flavored…
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 19, 2026 (11 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/juangcarmona/agent-toolkit
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from juangcarmona
- 0.570score
adr
juangcarmona
Draft and maintain Architecture Decision Records from maintainer-supplied decisions and repository evidence.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
adopt
juangcarmona
Bootstrap, reconcile, or explicitly reset a project's lifecycle configuration to the shared defaults.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
architecture-docs
juangcarmona
Create, review, and maintain evidence-grounded arc42 architecture documentation from implementation evidence, ADRs, and product intent.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
harden-process
juangcarmona
Turn one concrete failure into the smallest durable guard in the process itself.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
implement
juangcarmona
Apply the approved plan on its branch, verify the change against the Definition of Done in both lanes, and mark the pull request ready for review.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
integrate
juangcarmona
Land an approved change: enforce the Done gate, fold in the specifications, archive the plan, merge, and close the loop in the tracker.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get status running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
status skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/juangcarmona-status (last updated 2026-10-24)