review-entry
Create one dated, per-work-item retrospective after a change has merged: what worked, what did not, what to change next time, and sourced effort figures.
Skill by juangcarmona
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying review-entry?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/juangcarmona-review-entry
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/review-entry
What's inside
- Skill name
review-entry- Description
- Create one dated, per-work-item retrospective after a change has merged: what worked, what did not, what to change next time, and sourced effort figures. Use when `review` closes out a work item.
- License
- MIT
- Metadata
- author: juangcarmona · plugin: agentic-sdlc
- Instructions
- 48 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
## Purpose Create exactly one retrospective record for one merged work item. The default path is `docs/reviews/issue-<number>.md`, configured by the project's `## Label conventions` section. One file per issue prevents parallel reviews from contending on a shared append-only file. This skill does not measure effort. The caller supplies the effort figures and their source. Missing telemetry is recorded as `not captured`. ## When to use - At post-merge close-out when `review` has drafted the reflections. - When recording a retrospective for a completed work item. - When a post-merge finding needs to be attached to the work item. ## When not to use - Measuring effort; that is `collect-usage`. - Amending the Definition of Ready or Definition of Done; `review` proposes that change for human approval. - Recording a cross-item process rule; use the configured process ledger for that durable lesson. - Authoring a decision record; use `adr` and link its identifier in the record. ## Workflow The caller supplies the work item identifier and title, date (`YYYY-MM-DD`, default today), what worked, what did not, what to change next time, effort figures and their source, and the configured path. 1. **Resolve the target.** Read `docs/engineering-lifecycle.md` and use its configured per-item review path. If none is configured, use `docs/reviews/issue-<number>.md`. *Done when:* the exact target path is known. 2. **Check for an existing record.** If the target exists, stop and report it. Never overwrite it or append a second entry. *Done when:* the target is confirmed absent. 3. **Compose the record.** Include the work item and title, date, three reflections, sourced effort or `not captured`, and an amendments section. Route structural lessons to an ADR, process ledger, hardening change, or proposed Ready/Done amendment; use `none` when no amendment is warranted. *Done when:* every field is filled or explicitly marked absent. 4. **Create the file exclusively.** Use a create-if-absent write. If another run creates the same path first, stop and read the existing record; do not overwrite it. *Done when:* exactly one record exists at the target. 5. **Report the record.** Give the caller the work item, path, and any lesson routed to another destination. *Done when:* the record and its follow-up are clear. ## Validation - Exactly one per-item record was created and any existing record remained unchanged. - The record follows the configured format and includes all required reflections. - Every effort figure names its source or is marked `not captured`. - Structural lessons have a destination or the amendments section says `none`. - No telemetry was read and no collector was started here. ## Common pitfalls | Pitfall | Fix | |---|---| | Appending different issues to one shared file | Create one file per issue | | Replacing an existing issue record | Stop; a correction is a later, explicit amendment, never an overwrite | | Guessing an effort figure | Record `not captured` | | Leaving a structural lesson buried in a retrospective | Route it to the process ledger, hardening work, Ready/Done amendment, or ADR | | Running another capability from here | The calling `review` stage owns composition |
From juangcarmona/agent-toolkit, MIT.
More from juangcarmona/agent-toolkit
- 0.570score
adopt
juangcarmona
Bootstrap, reconcile, or explicitly reset a project's lifecycle configuration to the shared defaults.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
adr
juangcarmona
Draft and maintain Architecture Decision Records from maintainer-supplied decisions and repository evidence.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
architecture-docs
juangcarmona
Create, review, and maintain evidence-grounded arc42 architecture documentation from implementation evidence, ADRs, and product intent.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
propose
juangcarmona
Turn a ready work item into a reviewable solution design with tasks and test impact, raised as a draft pull request.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
review
juangcarmona
Learn from a merged cycle: record what happened with measured effort and route the lessons into the process itself.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
status
juangcarmona
Report where a work item sits in the lifecycle, what comes next, and what has drifted.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
harden-process
juangcarmona
Turn one concrete failure into the smallest durable guard in the process itself.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
implement
juangcarmona
Apply the approved plan on its branch, verify the change against the Definition of Done in both lanes, and mark the pull request ready for review.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
integrate
juangcarmona
Land an approved change: enforce the Done gate, fold in the specifications, archive the plan, merge, and close the loop in the tracker.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
ff
juangcarmona
Run the configured development lifecycle end to end with bounded, independent agent reviews and durable evidence.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.553score
plan
juangcarmona
Plan a refined work item using the lifecycle's existing proposal workflow.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.529score
document-to-markdown
juangcarmona
Convert Word (.doc, .docx), PowerPoint (.ppt, .pptx), Excel (.xls, .xlsx), OpenDocument (.odt, .ods, .odp), RTF, EPUB, CSV, and PDF files to GitHub-Flavored…
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 19, 2026 (11 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/juangcarmona/agent-toolkit
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from juangcarmona
- 0.570score
adr
juangcarmona
Draft and maintain Architecture Decision Records from maintainer-supplied decisions and repository evidence.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
adopt
juangcarmona
Bootstrap, reconcile, or explicitly reset a project's lifecycle configuration to the shared defaults.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
architecture-docs
juangcarmona
Create, review, and maintain evidence-grounded arc42 architecture documentation from implementation evidence, ADRs, and product intent.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
review
juangcarmona
Learn from a merged cycle: record what happened with measured effort and route the lessons into the process itself.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
integrate
juangcarmona
Land an approved change: enforce the Done gate, fold in the specifications, archive the plan, merge, and close the loop in the tracker.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
implement
juangcarmona
Apply the approved plan on its branch, verify the change against the Definition of Done in both lanes, and mark the pull request ready for review.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get review-entry running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
review-entry skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/juangcarmona-review-entry (last updated 2026-10-24)