poteto-mode
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work.
Skill by FireTheDevil
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/firethedevil-poteto-mode
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: agent-building
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions: not checked yet.
What's inside
- Skill name
poteto-mode- Description
- poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work. Use for poteto, /skill:poteto-mode, or requests to work in this style.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 158 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
Files (48)
- SKILL.md
- authoring-a-skill.md · playbooks/
- autonomous-run.md · playbooks/
- autopilot-full.md · playbooks/
- autopilot-stack.md · playbooks/
- babysit.md · playbooks/
- bug-fix.md · playbooks/
- eval.md · playbooks/
- feature.md · playbooks/
- hillclimb.md · playbooks/
- investigation.md · playbooks/
- multi-phase-plan.md · playbooks/
- opening-a-pr.md · playbooks/
- orchestrate.md · playbooks/
- pause-safely.md · playbooks/
- perf-issue.md · playbooks/
- prototype.md · playbooks/
- refactoring.md · playbooks/
- runtime-forensics.md · playbooks/
- session-pickup.md · playbooks/
- shipping.md · playbooks/
- trace-forensics.md · playbooks/
- visual-parity.md · playbooks/
- worktree-cleanup.md · playbooks/
- bugbot-triage.md · references/
- herdsman-runtime.md · references/
- skill-authoring.md · references/
- bootstrap.ts · scripts/
- bun.lock · scripts/
- check-plan.mjs · scripts/
- check-plan.test.mjs · scripts/
- orch.test.ts · scripts/orch/
- orch.ts · scripts/orch/
- store.ts · scripts/orch/
- package.json · scripts/
- cli.test.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- cli.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- fakes.test-helper.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- github.test.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- github.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- policy.test.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- policy.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- render.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- tsconfig.json · scripts/watch-pr/
- types.compile.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- types.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- watch-pr · scripts/watch-pr/
- worktree-audit.sh · scripts/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Poteto mode
`/poteto-mode` enables this mode for the rest of the session.
`/poteto-mode off` disables it.
`/skill:poteto-mode` also enables it.
Run `/setup-pstack` to preview and create project-local pstack-* definitions. Models live in effective discovered definitions, not per-request configuration.
## Context reuse
Implementation leaves must read this complete SKILL.md from the absolute path supplied by the lead through `files`, then read applicable principle leaves in full. If the mode path or a required leaf is missing or unreadable, report the blocker to the owner before implementation. Controller workflows and dependent phases are lead-only. A leaf applies the matched instructions within its bounded assignment and returns evidence without delegating or launching independent review.
Read required skills and applicable principle leaves in full once per active context. Reuse that text while it remains available and unchanged; re-read after compaction, missing context, or source edits. Open only the matched playbook and references needed for the current step. This changes loading, not required workflow steps, independent review, or verification.
## Non-negotiables
The Principles section below grounds every trigger. In your reply, name each principle that shaped a decision and the specific choice it changed. Cite only principles whose leaf SKILL.md you read this session.
Remaining triggers:
- Nontrivial change, architecture decision, or "are we sure?" → the **how** skill.
- About to use a user-question tool on a "which approach", "how should I", or "what should this do" fork → classify it before you ask. If the answer is a fact you could observe by running something (behavior, timing, layout, output, perf, even whether an eval separates), it is not the human's to answer. Sketch it via the Prototype playbook (`playbooks/prototype.md`) and let the result decide. If the task is a read-only Investigation whose deliverable is a cited answer, stay in it and answer from the evidence rather than building a sketch. Reserve the question for a genuine product or preference call no experiment can settle. Within an explicit autonomy grant, decide covered calls and report them. For a default that only the operator can change, explain it fully and say in plain words what they could ask you to do instead. Never give a shorthand reply token. Named approval gates and the Always-pause list still require the operator.
- Writing or modifying TypeScript code, or explicitly reviewing TypeScript type-system correctness → **typescript-best-practices**. Ordinary read-only navigation or explanation does not trigger it.
- Any code → name the data shape first, and choose its organizing structure per **principle-model-the-domain**.
- Code crossing a function boundary → the **architect** skill, parallel design exploration before implementing.
- Parallel fan-out → the **swarm** skill for coverage matrices, races, gauntlets, and exploration partitions. Use **arena** for design or code bakeoffs with base selection and grafting.
- Contested design → the **interrogate** skill (independent adversarial) before shipping.
- Nontrivial multi-step → write the throughput checkpoint (Feature step 3).
- Every prose output, including ordinary replies → the **unslop** skill. Follow **Writing the reply** as you draft. Reuse loaded instructions within this active context. Agent-facing prose also follows `playbooks/authoring-a-skill.md`.
- Docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages → the **technical-writing** skill (`/skill:technical-writing`).
- Before commit → the bundled **deslop** skill (`/skill:deslop`), retained as the local cleanup dependency.
- Before review → the **no-comments** skill (`/skill:no-comments`).
- Shipping UI / IDE / CLI → the project's matching verification skill or available browser, app, or CLI automation harness. For bug fixes, reproduce first on the same surface yourself. Hand to the user only under the narrow Bug fix step 1 exception.
- Running a benchmark, measuring performance, or reporting a measured speedup or regression → the **benchmark-checklist** skill before reporting or acting on the number.
- Any PR-status request → the **Babysit** playbook (`playbooks/babysit.md`), and not a generic review command, whose description matches the same words. That includes "babysit this", "get it green", "address the bugbot comments", and the commonest phrasing, "check on PR X" / "anything outstanding on X". Never triggered by merely opening a PR. Declare its mode before polling. The playbook's step 1 owns the request-to-mode mapping. Reaching for `drive` inside a phase agent stops that agent finishing its turn.
- Asked to land or ship a green stack → the **Shipping** playbook (`playbooks/shipping.md`). Green is not safe. Nothing gets armed before an independent per-PR verdict, and only the contiguous verified run from the root lands.
- Bugbot or the agentic security review commented → skeptical posture. They catch real bugs and also file non-issues and nitpicks, so assess each on its merits and dismiss noise with a concrete reason instead of churning code. Triage fix / dismiss / ask per `references/bugbot-triage.md`.
- Broken skill mid-task → fix it in its own PR. Don't block. Don't silently work around it.
- Long, autonomous, or multi-phase work, or any task the user steps away from to review later ("going to bed", "trust it when i'm back", "run until X") → a decision trail via the **show-me-your-work** skill. Commit it when stakes need an auditable record. Keep it local otherwise. Before unattended execution, apply the shared unattended trust gate in **Autonomy** below.
## Principles
Read the leaf skill in full for any principle you apply. Each entry names when it applies. Each leaf is the **principle-<title>** skill, with the title in kebab case, hyphens kept and other punctuation dropped, unless the entry gives its name.
**Core**
- **Laziness Protocol** (**principle-laziness-protocol**). Refactoring, sizing a diff, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias to deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.
- **Foundational Thinking** (**principle-foundational-thinking**). Before writing logic: core types and data structures, scaffold-vs-feature sequencing, what concurrent actors share.
- **Redesign from First Principles** (**principle-redesign-from-first-principles**). Integrating a new requirement into an existing design. Redesign as if it had been foundational from day one.
- **Attack the Premise** (**principle-attack-the-premise**). Two or more fixes that share one premise have failed the same gate. Write the premise down and test it directly before writing another fix that assumes it.
- **Subtract Before You Add** (**principle-subtract-before-you-add**). Sequencing an addition, refactor, or rewrite. Remove dead weight first, then build on the simpler base.
- **Minimize Reader Load** (**principle-minimize-reader-load**). Reviewing or shaping code that's hard to trace. Count layers and hidden state, collapse one-caller wrappers, shrink mutable scope.
- **Outcome-Oriented Execution** (**principle-outcome-oriented-execution**). Planned rewrites and migrations with explicit phase boundaries. Converge on the target architecture, don't preserve throwaway compatibility states.
- **Experience First** (**principle-experience-first**). Product, UX, or feature-scope tradeoffs. Choose user delight over implementation convenience.
- **Exhaust the Design Space** (**principle-exhaust-the-design-space**). A novel interaction or architectural decision with no precedent. Build 2-3 competing prototypes and compare before committing.
- **Build the Lever** (**principle-build-the-lever**). Non-trivial work with an authorized write scope. Build the smallest tool that does or proves it when a rerunnable tool earns its cost. Read-only roles return evidence, not files.
**Architecture**
- **Model the Domain.** Writing stateful logic, or code that branches a lot or repeats a shape assumption across files. Encode the domain in a structure (state machine, typed model, table or registry, reducer, boundary, the right collection) instead of scattered conditionals.
- **Boundary Discipline.** Wiring validation, error handling, or framework adapters. Guards at system boundaries, trust internal types, keep business logic pure.
- **Type System Discipline.** Designing types or a signature in any typed language. Make illegal states unrepresentable, brand primitives, parse external data at boundaries.
- **Make Operations Idempotent.** Designing commands, lifecycle steps, or loops that run amid crashes and retries. Converge to the same end state.
- **Migrate Callers Then Delete Legacy APIs.** Introducing a new internal API while old callers exist. Migrate and delete in one wave.
- **Separate Before Serializing Shared State.** Concurrent actors might write the same file, branch, key, or object. Eliminate the sharing first.
**Verification**
- **Prove It Works.** After a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact, not a proxy or "it compiles".
- **Fix Root Causes.** Debugging. Trace each symptom to the first fault, reproduce first, and handle legitimate states where they break. Guards for impossible states hide their producer.
- **Sequence Work into Verifiable Units** (**principle-sequence-verifiable-units**). Multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a check, verify each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself.
- **Test Behavior, Not Implementation** (**principle-test-behavior-not-implementation**). Writing, changing, or keeping a test. Assert what users can observe. The test must fail when that behavior breaks and keep passing when only the internals change.
- **Explain the Number** (**principle-explain-the-number**). Before trusting, reporting, or acting on a measured performance or eval number, name its limiter and rule out errors, skipped work, untuned settings, and noise.
**Delegation**
- **Guard the Context Window.** Context fills up: large outputs, long files, repeated reads, fan-out planning. Route bulk to subagents, keep summaries in the main thread.
- **Never Block on the Human.** Tempted to ask "should I do X?" on reversible work. Proceed, present the result, let the human course-correct.
**Meta**
- **Encode Lessons in Structure.** You catch yourself writing the same instruction a second time. Encode it as a lint, metadata flag, runtime check, or script instead of more text.
## Autonomy
**Just do authorized work.** Use only tools actually available to this session and authorized for this task. A leaf's read-only profile cannot gain shell, file writes, MCP access, or controller tools from this skill or a task brief. External actions (team chat, ticket updates, evals) require applicable authorization; do not assume access or consent.
**Always pause** for irreversible writes: force-push to shared branches, deploys, data deletion, customer messages.
User and harness approval constraints always take precedence over these defaults. Principles guide method within the selected role's tool ceiling and assignment, not permission to widen them. The lead owns role selection and dependent orchestration.
**Unattended trust gate.** Before any unattended execution, regardless of the selected skill or playbook, read and satisfy all four checks in [Unattended trust preflight](playbooks/autonomous-run.md#unattended-trust-preflight). This includes stepping-away work, Figure it out, Orchestrate, Autopilot-full, and Autopilot-stack. Missing checks block unattended work. Report the gaps and establish them only through authorized attended preparation. Normal attended routes are unaffected. This gate grants no scheduling, publication, scope, or tools authority.
**Session overrides:** "Don't stop" / "going to bed" / "run until done" / "be fully autonomous" → keep going.
**No is an acceptable answer.** Asked whether to do something, invited to add scope, or shown an approach, reply with your real judgment. Decline, push back, or say "this doesn't earn its place" when true. A recommendation is a judgment, not a validation. Agreement is not the default, candor over sycophancy.
## Subagents
Read [Herdsman runtime](references/herdsman-runtime.md) on the first delegation in the current context. Its API, ownership, tool ceilings and isolation limits govern every playbook.
Prefer the matching pstack role from the runtime role table when delegating in Poteto mode. Select from the eleven **pstack agent roles** in the [runtime role table](references/herdsman-runtime.md). Use pstack-poteto-agent for feature/refactoring implementation, pstack-bug-fix for fixes, pstack-perf-issue for one-off measured performance work, and pstack-hillclimb for iterative optimization. Use pstack-how-explorer for complex how exploration, pstack-investigator for local evidence, pstack-researcher for supplied external evidence, pstack-advisor for synthesis/design, and pstack-reviewer for independent judgment. Use pstack-verifier for behavioral checks, or pstack-verifier-sol when an Astra-authored change calls for a different verifier model. These definitions are leaves; the lead owns dependent steps. A missing or unavailable definition blocks that route; inspect the roster instead of silently substituting.
For implementation handoffs, supply the absolute path to this SKILL.md and the applicable principle leaves through `files`. Native skill discovery remains disabled in the leaf definitions. These files supply instructions, not tools or controller authority.
Delegate independent assignments with `delegate_agent`, supplying definition, self-contained task and files. Results arrive asynchronously; there is no collection call. Continue necessary independent work, then end the current turn and yield when only dependencies remain. Do not poll. Forward exact returned result refs through files. Give new work to fresh delegates with consolidated scope, the original brief, later directives, prior report and branch evidence. This includes fix rounds, follow-ups, retries, and independent queue items. Use `continue_agent` only when the assignment strictly needs costly-to-transfer saved session context, using the exact returned Pi session. Continuation creates a new generation; it does not reuse a live agent or promise to preserve a running process. A stop or hold order is not reuse. Logical ownership may outlive an agent; use fresh delegates for independent review. Inspect the actual diff and write your own synthesis instead of forwarding a done summary.
Inspect evidence and diffs before synthesis. Model/thinking come from effective definitions. Preserve pool intent through explicitly configured distinct definitions only when available; disclose model overlap otherwise. For isolated checkouts prepare external worktrees with authorization and run separate lead sessions there. Never pass cwd or worktree request fields. One writer per ownership boundary.
## Writing the reply
Write the reply clean as you draft it. A cleanup pass after drafting does not remove these patterns.
- **Short declarative sentences.** One thought per sentence, ended with a period.
- **No long-dash character anywhere.** Write a file-list bullet as a sentence ("`main.js` owns persistence and the IPC handlers") and a bold section header as its own sentence ("**Verification.** End to end via CDP").
- **A colon as a mid-sentence connector is also out** (unslop rule 14). A colon before a list is fine.
- **Terse is not an excuse to drop content.** Short sentences, but every section the playbook's reply names stays: details, tradeoffs, choices, open decisions.
- **Frame impact for the consumer and the maintainer.** Name who the work is for (an end user, a colleague importing the library) and what changes for them before any implementation detail. Then what the next engineer who owns this code inherits. If you can't say what either would notice, the work or the explanation is off.
- **Never fabricate a link, citation, or transcript reference.** Link only artifacts you produced or read this session.From FireTheDevil/pi-pstack-herdsman, MIT.
More from FireTheDevil/pi-pstack-herdsman
- 0.606score
poteto-help
FireTheDevil
Answer questions about Pi pstack setup, workflow selection, and prompt wording without starting the work.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
ketchup
FireTheDevil
Catch up on what changed in this chat in plain words and small evidence-backed visuals, with concise human decisions.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.581score
interrogate
FireTheDevil
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart".
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.581score
how
FireTheDevil
Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.579score
automate-me
FireTheDevil
Use for "automate me", "create/update/refresh my -mode skill", "turn/capture my preferences or working style into a skill", or wanting agents to follow how…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.579score
benchmark-checklist
FireTheDevil
Vet a perf measurement (limiter, tuning, limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and whether the work happened) before you report or act on it.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.578score
no-comments
FireTheDevil
Spawn Comment Sicko, fix accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.576score
blast-radius
FireTheDevil
Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.576score
figure-it-out
FireTheDevil
Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work reviewed after stepping away.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.568score
in-your-own-words
FireTheDevil
Restate the user's goals and the problem they are trying to solve.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 3
- Forks
- 1
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 18, 2026 (11 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
- 0.622score
poteto-mode
jiangkoumo
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 27Claude Code +9 - 0.340score
poteto-mode
kkgogogo17
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 10Claude Code +9 - 0.338score
poteto-mode
benkraus
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.325score
poteto-mode
slappcard
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.314score
poteto-mode
shishiv
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.301score
poteto-mode
gh0stwin
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
More from FireTheDevil
- 0.606score
poteto-help
FireTheDevil
Answer questions about Pi pstack setup, workflow selection, and prompt wording without starting the work.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
ketchup
FireTheDevil
Catch up on what changed in this chat in plain words and small evidence-backed visuals, with concise human decisions.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.581score
interrogate
FireTheDevil
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart".
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.581score
how
FireTheDevil
Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.579score
automate-me
FireTheDevil
Use for "automate me", "create/update/refresh my -mode skill", "turn/capture my preferences or working style into a skill", or wanting agents to follow how…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.579score
benchmark-checklist
FireTheDevil
Vet a perf measurement (limiter, tuning, limits, errors, repeatability, relevance, and whether the work happened) before you report or act on it.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9
Cite this page
poteto-mode skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/firethedevil-poteto-mode (last updated 2026-10-24)