codebase-inventory
Produce the deterministic Tier-1 inventory of an existing codebase — routes/RPC/jobs, broker channels, persistent schema, external egress, deployables…
Skill by evolplus
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying codebase-inventory?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/evolplus-codebase-inventory
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: testing
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/codebase-inventory
What's inside
- Skill name
codebase-inventory- Description
- Produce the deterministic Tier-1 inventory of an existing codebase — routes/RPC/jobs, broker channels, persistent schema, external egress, deployables, production libraries, test specs — as a reproducible ID-stamped manifest at docs/archaeology-reports/<slug>.inventory.md. Use first on every Codebase Archaeologist dispatch (brownfield Stage 1a), on SA brownfield extract, and on any re-extraction. It is the ground truth the extraction-validator reconciles kit artifacts against at Stage 3.5.
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Instructions
- 62 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Codebase Inventory (brownfield Tier 1) ## Use Use at brownfield Stage 1a, before any interpretive reading of the codebase; at Stage 3.5 when the validator re-derives ground truth; and on every re-extraction. The kit splits brownfield evidence into two tiers: - **Tier 1 (this skill) — mechanical.** What is demonstrably there, produced by recorded commands rather than judgement. Same commit in, same manifest out. - **Tier 2 — interpretive.** What it means and why it exists. Expensive, non-reproducible, and the only tier that can be wrong in an interesting way. Tier 1 exists so Tier 2 can be checked. Interpretive sweeps fail silently by omission: nothing in the output points at the surface that was never found. Every omission the archaeologist's procedure has since patched with prose — nested sub-namespaces invisible to flat globs, routes reachable only through a service registry, one-sided broker observations — is this failure mode. ## Inputs - Codebase root at a named commit SHA, working tree clean - Config files, build system, lockfiles - The dispatch `scope:` (`unscoped` or a service/module name) ## Outputs - `docs/archaeology-reports/<slug>.inventory.md` — ID-stamped manifest with a `## Reproduction` block carrying every command that produced it, and a `## Surface totals` block - On a re-run for an existing slug: `docs/archaeology-reports/<slug>.inventory-diff.md` ## Inventory ID scheme (load-bearing — do not improvise) Kit artifacts cite these IDs in `Covers-Inventory:`, and Stage 3.5 computes coverage as a set difference over them. | Prefix | Section | One row is | |---|---|---| | `INV-R-NNN` | Routes & sync surfaces | one HTTP route / RPC method / GraphQL field / WebSocket channel / UI route | | `INV-E-NNN` | Async surfaces | one topic, queue, subscription, consumer group, cron entry, or scheduled job | | `INV-T-NNN` | Persistent schema | one table / collection / key-pattern | | `INV-X-NNN` | External egress | one distinct external host or service endpoint | | `INV-D-NNN` | Deployables | one deployable unit (image, service, lambda, static bundle) | | `INV-L-NNN` | Production libraries | one production-tagged dependency | | `INV-S-NNN` | Test specs | one test file | IDs are assigned in sorted order within each section so they stay stable across re-runs of the same commit. ## Procedure 1. **Pin the snapshot.** `git rev-parse HEAD`. Halt if the working tree is dirty — an inventory over uncommitted changes is not reproducible. Record `Snapshot-Commit`, `Generated`, `Scope`, `Toolchain` in the header. 2. **Deployables and file census (`INV-D`).** Enumerate from build/deploy artifacts, never from directory intuition: `Dockerfile*`, compose files, k8s manifests, serverless configs, Procfiles, `go.mod` / `package.json` / `*.csproj` / `pom.xml` / `Cargo.toml`. Record per-language LOC so later sections can be scale-checked — 40K LOC and three routes means route extraction under-ran. 3. **Routes and sync surfaces (`INV-R`).** Prefer, in order: a spec the project already generates (`openapi.json`, `.proto`, GraphQL SDL, `rails routes`, `php artisan route:list`, `django show_urls`); a registry / factory / container / router class, read in full with every registered identifier enumerated; a recursive-glob fallback over route-declaration syntax (`**/*.go`, `**/*.php`, `**/*.cs`, `**/*.ts`) so nested sub-namespaces are reached. Record identifier, method+path, declaring file:line, and the extractor that found it. 4. **Async surfaces (`INV-E`).** Topics, queues, consumer groups, and schedules from producer/consumer registration, broker config, infra-as-code, crontabs, k8s `CronJob`, and framework schedulers. A brokered flow needs both sides: record the producer row and the consumer row separately, and mark a one-sided observation `Parse: unresolved` rather than assuming the counterpart. 5. **Persistent schema (`INV-T`).** Migrations, DDL, ORM models, or live `information_schema` introspection when a read-only connection exists. Include column types — SA's extract needs type-level detail and re-introspecting later is wasted work. For KV/document stores, one row per key pattern with TTL and value shape. 6. **External egress (`INV-X`).** Hostnames and base URLs from config, env templates, Helm values, ConfigMaps, service-registry classes, and hard-coded literals. Enumerate first; categorize never — categorization is Tier 2. A host serving an internal concern (SSO, alerting, chat) still gets a row. 7. **Production libraries (`INV-L`).** From the lockfile where one exists (the lockfile is truth; the manifest is intent). Name, resolved version, pinned or floating. 8. **Test specs (`INV-S`).** One row per test file with layer and framework. Do not estimate coverage percentages — a coverage number without a run is a guess, and guesses are Tier 2. 9. **Emit the totals block.** Per section: total, and count of `Parse: unresolved`. This is what Stage 3.5 reconciles against. 10. **Re-run mode.** When a manifest exists for this slug, emit the diff — rows added, removed, changed, by ID. Re-extraction is then a diff, not a redo: only artifacts citing a changed ID need revisiting. ## Hard Rules - No judgement in Tier 1. If a row required deciding what something means, it is Tier 2. Purpose, bounded context, "core vs bolted on" — all Tier 2. - Every row carries a command and a file:line. A row you cannot attribute is not evidence. - Never drop an unparseable row. Record `Parse: unresolved` with the raw text. A dropped row is an unknown unknown; that is the failure this skill exists to prevent. - Two extractors beat one where the second is cheap (generated spec vs source glob, lockfile vs manifest, migrations vs live introspection). Record both counts and the delta — disagreement localizes the gap and is the highest-value signal here. - The manifest is an audit-trail artifact, never a deliverable. Kit artifacts stay self-contained and cite inventory IDs in provenance headers only, never in body content.
From evolplus/talos, Apache-2.0.
More from evolplus/talos
- 0.631score
design-system-author
evolplus
How to build a Figma Foundation page (design tokens + reusable components) BEFORE drawing screens, so spacing / text sizes / button styles / element alignment…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.631score
be-framework-coding-standard
evolplus
Standardized backend implementation guidance for BE Dev using the SRS-declared Backend-Track and Backend-Framework.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.628score
adr-author
evolplus
How to write an Architecture Decision Record under docs/decisions/.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.628score
api-contract-author
evolplus
How to publish, freeze, and version an API contract under docs/api-contracts/.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.626score
ba-post-implementation
evolplus
BA Phase 5 — post-implementation completeness verification (UI tasks).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.626score
ba-design-completeness
evolplus
BA Phase 3 — post-sign-off design completeness verification.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.626score
ba-iteration-planning
evolplus
BA Phase 4 — iteration dispatch planning.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.626score
ba-mode-external-source
evolplus
BA Phase 1.C ingestion mode (ingest-from-external-source).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.626score
ba-mode-reverse-engineer
evolplus
BA Phase 1.E ingestion mode (reverse-engineer-from-code) — brownfield onboarding Stage 3.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.626score
backend-logging-traceability
evolplus
Backend logging and traceability standard for BE Dev.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.626score
data-lifecycle-contracts
evolplus
How SA identifies gate fields and cross-component column-write contracts in the data model, and documents them in docs/architecture.md §6 so BE/FE Dev know…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.626score
ba-mode-requirements-folder
evolplus
BA Phase 1.F ingestion mode (ingest-from-requirements-folder) — greenfield with fragmented upstream.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 1
- Last commit (this folder)
- Sep 15, 2026 (1 month ago)
- Last release
- Oct 12, 2026 (19 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Repository
- github.com/evolplus/talos
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from evolplus
- 0.631score
be-framework-coding-standard
evolplus
Standardized backend implementation guidance for BE Dev using the SRS-declared Backend-Track and Backend-Framework.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.631score
design-system-author
evolplus
How to build a Figma Foundation page (design tokens + reusable components) BEFORE drawing screens, so spacing / text sizes / button styles / element alignment…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.628score
adr-author
evolplus
How to write an Architecture Decision Record under docs/decisions/.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.628score
api-contract-author
evolplus
How to publish, freeze, and version an API contract under docs/api-contracts/.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.626score
ba-iteration-planning
evolplus
BA Phase 4 — iteration dispatch planning.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.626score
ba-design-completeness
evolplus
BA Phase 3 — post-sign-off design completeness verification.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get codebase-inventory running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
codebase-inventory skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/evolplus-codebase-inventory (last updated 2026-10-24)