Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

go-test-table-driven

Deep dive on table-driven tests in Go: when to use them, when to avoid them, struct design, subtest naming, advanced patterns like test matrices and shared…

Skill by eduardo-sl

IndexedMIT★ 82
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/eduardo-sl-go-test-table-driven

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Deep dive on table-driven tests in Go: when to use them, when to avoid them, struct design, subtest naming, advanced patterns like test matrices and shared setup, and refactoring bloated tables into clean ones. Use when writing table-driven tests, refactoring test tables, reviewing table test structure, or deciding whether table-driven is the right approach. Trigger examples: "table-driven test", "table test", "test cases struct", "test matrix", "parametrize tests", "data-driven test", "refactor test table". Not for: general test strategy, mocks, golden files, fuzzing (go-test-quality), benchmarks (go-performance-review).

Use cases: design, testing, data, writing

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/go-test-table-driven

Tools it pre-approves 7

From allowed-tools in SKILL.md: the agent may use these without asking you each time.

  • Read
  • Edit
  • Write
  • Glob
  • Grep
  • Bash(go:*)
  • Bash(gofmt:*)

What's inside

Skill name
go-test-table-driven
Description
Deep dive on table-driven tests in Go: when to use them, when to avoid them, struct design, subtest naming, advanced patterns like test matrices and shared setup, and refactoring bloated tables into clean ones. Use when writing table-driven tests, refactoring test tables, reviewing table test structure, or deciding whether table-driven is the right approach. Trigger examples: "table-driven test", "table test", "test cases struct", "test matrix", "parametrize tests", "data-driven test", "refactor test table". Not for: general test strategy, mocks, golden files, fuzzing (go-test-quality), benchmarks (go-performance-review).
License
MIT
Compatibility
Designed for Claude Code or similar AI coding agents working on Go projects. Requires the Go toolchain.
Allowed tools
Read, Edit, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash(go:*), Bash(gofmt:*)
Metadata
author: eduardo-sl · version: 1.2.2
Instructions
154 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Before installing

  • Pre-approves some shell commands

Files (3)

  • SKILL.md
  • patterns.md · references/
  • refactoring.md · references/

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Go Table-Driven Tests

Table-driven tests are a powerful Go idiom — when used correctly. Most
codebases either underuse them (10 copy-paste tests) or overuse them
(complex branching logic in a 200-line struct). This skill covers the
sweet spot.

> Community default. A project skill or agent-config rule that explicitly
> supersedes `go-test-table-driven` takes precedence over this one.

Detailed reference material, loaded on demand:

- `references/patterns.md` — full worked examples: canonical tables,
  `wantErr`/`wantErrIs`, parallel tables, map-based tables, error-only
  tables, struct alignment for readability.
- `references/refactoring.md` — recognizing bloated tables and rewriting
  them as explicit subtests, with before/after examples.

Read a reference file only when the summary below is not enough for the
task at hand.

## 1. When Table-Driven Tests Shine

Use a table only when ALL of these are true:

- **Same function** under test across all cases
- **Same assertion pattern** — input in, output out, compare
- **Cases differ only in data**, not in setup or verification logic
- **3+ cases** — fewer than 3, explicit tests are clearer

Canonical use case: pure functions, parsers, validators, formatters.

```go
func TestParseSize(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name    string
        input   string
        want    int64
        wantErr bool
    }{
        {name: "plain bytes", input: "1024", want: 1024},
        {name: "kilobytes suffix", input: "4KB", want: 4096},
        {name: "empty string", input: "", wantErr: true},
        {name: "negative size", input: "-1", wantErr: true},
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got, err := ParseSize(tt.input)
            if tt.wantErr {
                require.Error(t, err)
                return
            }
            require.NoError(t, err)
            assert.Equal(t, tt.want, got)
        })
    }
}
```

Every case has the same shape, the loop body is a few lines, and adding
a case is one struct literal. No branching, no conditionals.

## 2. When NOT to Use Table-Driven Tests

- **Complex per-case setup** — `setupMock`/`setupFunc` function fields in
  the struct mean the table is hiding complexity. Write explicit subtests.
- **Fewer than 3 cases** — the struct definition is more code than two
  plain test functions.
- **Multiple branching paths** — `if tt.shouldError` / `if tt.wantRedirect`
  in the loop body means each branch is a different test pretending to
  share a structure. Split it.

See `references/refactoring.md` for before/after rewrites of each smell.

## 3. Struct Design Rules

1. **Every field must vary between at least 2 cases.** A field with the
   same value everywhere is setup — move it outside the table.
2. **Name the `name` field as a short sentence** describing the scenario:
   `"returns error for negative amount"`, not `"case1"` or `"success"`.
3. **`wantErr bool` for "should it error?"** — check it first and `return`
   early in the loop body.
4. **`wantErrIs error` with a sentinel** when the caller must detect a
   specific error; assert with `require.ErrorIs`.
5. **≤5 fields.** More means the scenario is too complex for a table —
   split into separate test functions.

Full field-pattern examples are in `references/patterns.md`.

## 4. The Loop Body Must Be Trivial

The point of a table test is identical execution logic for every case.
Keep the loop body under ~10 lines: call, error check, comparison.
If it accumulates conditionals or per-case setup, the table has outgrown
its usefulness — refactor into explicit subtests.

## 5. Parallel Table Tests

```go
for _, tt := range tests {
    t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
        t.Parallel()
        got := Transform(tt.input)
        assert.Equal(t, tt.want, got)
    })
}
```

- Go 1.22+ scopes the loop variable per iteration — `tt := tt` capture is
  unnecessary. For Go <1.22 the capture is still required.
- Only use `t.Parallel()` when the function under test has no side
  effects and no shared mutable state.

## 6. Refactoring Bloated Tables

| Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|
| Struct has 8+ fields | Split into multiple test functions by scenario |

From eduardo-sl/go-agent-skills, MIT.

More from eduardo-sl/go-agent-skills

Signals

Stars
82
Forks
10
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 14, 2026 (15 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

Version
1.2.2
License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from eduardo-sl

Cite this page

go-test-table-driven skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/eduardo-sl-go-test-table-driven (last updated 2026-10-24)