Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

Visual Audit

Structured visual design critique with specific actionable feedback

Skill by dtsong

IndexedMIT★ 2
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/dtsong-visual-audit-3d99c0

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Structured visual design critique with specific actionable feedback

Use cases: design, security

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/visual-audit

What's inside

Skill name
Visual Audit
Description
Structured visual design critique with specific actionable feedback
License
MIT
Instructions
115 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Agent Skills spec issues

  • name: only lowercase letters, digits and single hyphens allowed
  • name: "Visual Audit" does not match folder "visual-audit"

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Visual Audit

## Purpose

Perform a structured visual design critique of an interface, producing specific actionable feedback on hierarchy, contrast, spacing, typography, color, and overall coherence.

## Inputs

- Screenshots, mockups, or live implementation of the interface
- Design system or style guide (if it exists)
- Target context (marketing page, app dashboard, settings screen, etc.)
- Accessibility requirements (WCAG AA, AAA, or custom)

## Process

### Step 1: Squint Test

View the interface at arm's length (or blur it mentally). Identify:
- What's the loudest element? Is it the right one?
- Can you identify the primary action within 3 seconds?
- Is there a clear visual reading order?
- Are there any areas of visual "soup" (too much competing for attention)?

### Step 2: Hierarchy Audit

Check the information hierarchy:
- **Heading levels:** Are there clear H1 → H2 → H3 distinctions via size and weight?
- **Primary vs secondary actions:** Is the primary action visually dominant (filled button) vs secondary (ghost/outline)?
- **Content grouping:** Are related items visually grouped (proximity) and distinct groups separated (spacing)?
- **Emphasis distribution:** Is anything fighting for attention that shouldn't be?

### Step 3: Typography Audit

Check the type system:
- **Scale consistency:** Are font sizes from a defined scale (not arbitrary)?
- **Line height:** Is body text at 1.4-1.6x line height for readability?
- **Measure:** Are line lengths between 45-75 characters for body text?
- **Weight usage:** Is font weight used semantically (bold for emphasis, not decoration)?
- **Font pairing:** Are typefaces intentionally paired (one serif + one sans, or a single family)?

### Step 4: Color and Contrast Audit

Check color usage:
- **Contrast ratios:** All text meets WCAG AA (4.5:1 normal text, 3:1 large text)
- **Color meaning:** Color is not the sole indicator of status (add icons, text, patterns)
- **Palette coherence:** Colors come from a defined palette, not ad-hoc hex values
- **Dark mode:** If supported, contrast ratios are verified in dark mode too
- **Saturation balance:** No oversaturated elements that vibrate or strain eyes

### Step 5: Spacing and Alignment Audit

Check spatial consistency:
- **Grid adherence:** Elements align to a defined grid (4px, 8px base)
- **Consistent spacing:** Same-level items use the same spacing value
- **Breathing room:** Content doesn't feel cramped; whitespace is used intentionally
- **Alignment lines:** Elements that should align actually align (check left edges, baselines)

### Step 6: Component Consistency Audit

Check for visual consistency:
- **Button styles:** All buttons of the same type look the same
- **Card patterns:** Cards share border radius, shadow, padding
- **Icon style:** Icons are from one set (outlined, filled, or mixed intentionally)
- **Form elements:** Inputs, selects, and textareas share a visual language

## Output Format

```markdown
# Visual Audit Report

## Overall Assessment
**Score:** [1-10]
**Summary:** [2-3 sentences on the interface's visual effectiveness]

## Squint Test Results
- **Primary focus:** [What draws the eye first — is this correct?]
- **Reading order:** [Clear / Unclear / Competing elements]
- **Visual noise:** [Low / Medium / High]

## Findings

### [CRITICAL] [Category] — [Finding]
**Current:** [What's happening now]
**Issue:** [Why it's a problem — cite specific principle]
**Fix:** [Specific change — exact values where possible]

### [IMPROVEMENT] [Category] — [Finding]
**Current:** [What's happening now]
**Suggestion:** [Specific improvement with rationale]

## Contrast Report
| Element | Foreground | Background | Ratio | Pass AA |
|---------|-----------|------------|-------|---------|
| Body text | #333 | #fff | 12.6:1 | Yes |
| Muted text | #999 | #fff | 2.8:1 | NO |

## Quick Wins
1. [Change that would have the biggest visual impact for the least effort]
2. [Second quick win]
3. [Third quick win]
```

## Quality Checks

- [ ] Every finding includes a specific fix, not just a problem description
- [ ] Contrast ratios are calculated with actual color values
- [ ] Typography findings reference a type scale or specific sizes
- [ ] Spacing findings reference a grid system or specific values
- [ ] At least 3 quick wins are identified with effort-to-impact prioritization
- [ ] Dark mode contrast is checked if dark mode is supported

## Evolution Notes
<!-- Observations appended after each use -->

From dtsong/claude-code-windows-setup, MIT.

More from dtsong/claude-code-windows-setup

Signals

Stars
2
Forks
1
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Feb 21, 2026 (8 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

Same skill elsewhere

Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.

More from dtsong

Cite this page

Visual Audit skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/dtsong-visual-audit-3d99c0 (last updated 2026-10-24)