bc-tenancy-substantive
Deep BC Residential Tenancy Act knowledge: critical sections, bad-faith detection (renoviction, demoviction, caretaker loophole), eviction defence timelines…
Skill by dmang69
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying bc-tenancy-substantive?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/dmang69-bc-tenancy-substantive
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: legal
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/bc-tenancy-substantive
What's inside
- Skill name
bc-tenancy-substantive- Description
- Deep BC Residential Tenancy Act knowledge: critical sections, bad-faith detection (renoviction, demoviction, caretaker loophole), eviction defence timelines, repairs, disputed fees/charges, rent increases, deposits. Tenant-side and landlord-side. Plain language for self-reps; technical depth for lawyers. Legal information only. Pair with bc-tenancy-procedure for RTB process and bc-tenancy-advanced for JR/HR/strata/MHPTA.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 303 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (9)
- SKILL.md
- OFFICIAL-SECTION-MAP-CORRECTION.md · references/
- deposit-rules.md · references/
- policy-guidelines-summary.md · references/
- renoviction-defense.md · references/
- rent-increase-guideline.md · references/
- repair-evidence-guide.md · references/
- retaliation-doctrine.md · references/
- rta-s8-illegal-charges.md · references/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# BC Tenancy Substantive — Deep RTA Knowledge > **Disclaimer:** Legal information only. Verify every section at [bclaws.gov.bc.ca](https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca) and RTB materials at [gov.bc.ca/rtb](https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/housing-tenancy/residential-tenancies). > Section numbers and forms below are **working maps** — always **`[VERIFY ON BCLAWS / RTB]`** before filing or reliance. > Not legal advice. Self-represented litigants: deadlines are brutal — calendar first. ## Dual mode | Audience | Style | |----------|--------| | **Self-rep** | Plain language first; short steps; “what to do today” | | **Lawyer / advocate** | Section pins, doctrine, bad-faith patterns, remedy stacking | ## Skill routing | Need | Skill | |------|--------| | RTB procedure, hearings, evidence packaging, enforcement | `bc-tenancy-procedure` | | JR, human rights, strata, MHPTA, trauma-informed, ethics | `bc-tenancy-advanced` (= `bc-tenancy-advocacy`) | | Court drafting standard | `supreme-court-civil-counsel` | ## Analytical tags `[FACT]` · `[ALLEGATION]` · `[LAW]` · `[ARGUMENT]` · `[INFERENCE]` · `[ASSUMPTION]` · `[PROCEDURAL HISTORY]` · `[RECOMMENDATION]` · `[REMEDY]` --- ## Module 1: RTA Deep Mastery Quotes sections carefully; spots end-runs dressed as legitimate. ### Critical sections — **OFFICIAL BC Laws map** (current to 14 July 2026; re-verify before filing) > Retrieved from https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/02078_01 > See `references/OFFICIAL-SECTION-MAP-CORRECTION.md` and `legislation/court-ready/`. > **Earlier maps that used s. 6 for “cannot contract out”, s. 22 for quiet enjoyment, or ss. 25–26 for entry were incorrect.** | Section | Rule (plain) | Technical note (official) | |---------|--------------|---------------------------| | **s. 5** | Cannot avoid/contract out of Act or regulations | Attempts of no effect | | **s. 6** | Rights/obligations enforceable between L&T | Dispute resolution if unresolved | | **s. 15** | No application/processing/investigation/accept fees | Intake fee ban | | **s. 19** | Max security or pet deposit = ½ month’s rent each | Overpayment recoverable | | **s. 20** | Landlord deposit prohibitions | Timing, one deposit, no auto-keep clause | | **s. 22** | Acceleration term prohibited | **Not** quiet enjoyment | | **s. 28** | Quiet enjoyment | Privacy, disturbance, exclusive possession, common areas | | **s. 29** | Entry restricted | 24h written notice; **8 a.m.–9 p.m.**; emergencies etc. | | **s. 32–33** | Repair/maintain + emergency repairs | Health/safety + suitability; emergency list in s. 33 | | **s. 35–36** | End-of-tenancy condition inspection consequences | Deposit rights may extinguish | | **s. 38–39** | Deposit return / double / forwarding address | 15 days; double if s. 38(1) not met | | **s. 41–43** | Rent increases | 12-month spacing; 3 months’ notice; guideline/order/consent | | **Part 4** | How tenancy ends | Notice sections 45–50+ — verify each ground’s section before filing | | **Part 5** | Dispute resolution / review | Confirm review section numbers on BC Laws for the proceeding date | Court-ready extracts: `../../legislation/court-ready/RTA-key-sections-OFFICIAL.md` ### RTB Policy Guidelines (layer above the Act) **Not law**, but routinely applied by arbitrators. Always pull the **current** PG text. | PG # | Topic | |------|--------| | **PG 9** | Condition inspection reports | | **PG 14** | Security and pet damage deposits | | **PG 16** | Rent increases | | **PG 21** | Repairs and maintenance | | **PG 26** | Advocates at RTB hearings | | **PG 30** | Ending a tenancy | | **PG 37** | Two month notices (landlord’s use) | | **PG 40** | Four month notices (renovation/demolition) | **PG 26:** An advocate (non-lawyer) may represent a party at RTB hearings with arbitrator permission — basis for TRAC / community advocates. **Stay current:** RTA and PGs change. Verify at gov.bc.ca/rtb before citing. → `references/policy-guidelines-summary.md` --- ## Module 2: Bad-Faith Move Detector ⭐ ### Renovations or repairs requiring vacancy — director's order under s. 49.2 **Potential bad-faith pattern:** A landlord asserts that major work requires vacancy, but the proposed work is cosmetic, unsupported by permits, or followed by re-rental at a higher rent. **Official map (BC Laws consolidation current to July 14, 2026):** For renovations or repairs requiring vacancy, **s. 49.2** provides an application-for-order route and specifies statutory conditions. **Section 51.2** addresses a right of first refusal in qualifying circumstances; **s. 51.3** addresses compensation where no right of first refusal is given. Do not collapse these distinct provisions or assume that every renovation engages a same-rent return right. Verify the current Act, regulations, order, tenancy/building facts, eligibility, notice requirements, and remedy before making a claim. **Detection signals:** - No building permits applied for or issued - Work is cosmetic — does not require vacant possession - Unit re-listed at higher rent after eviction - Pattern of renovation notices without completed work **Response:** Dispute the notice + demand all permits and renovation plans in writing. → `references/renoviction-defense.md` ### Demoviction (Four Month Notice — demolition) Landlord must have an **actual demolition permit** and approved development. Speculative future demolition is not enough. ### Caretaker / employment housing — s. 48 **Potential issue:** The parties dispute whether a rental unit was provided for the term of genuine caretaker, manager, superintendent, or other employment. **Official map:** RTA **s. 48** governs specified end-of-employment notices and contains factual and notice requirements. The analysis must begin with the statutory definition of tenancy/tenancy agreement, exclusions in s. 4, the agreement, payment and employment records, why the unit was provided, whether employment ended, good faith where required, and the current notice requirements. Labels alone are not conclusive, but payment alone does not decide the issue either. **Section 5**, not s. 6, provides that the Act cannot be avoided. ### Common disputed-practice issue map | Issue | Correct starting point | Required verification | |--------|------------------------|-----------------------| | City/bylaw charge allocated to tenant | Agreement, enabling bylaw/statute, RTA s. 5, rent/services provisions, damages principles | Who is legally liable; whether contractual allocation is authorized and enforceable | | Administrative/application/processing fee | RTA s. 15 for prohibited application-type fees; agreement and regulations for other fees | Do not use s. 8, which appoints the director | | Strata fine or charge | SPA/bylaws, notice and hearing process, tenancy agreement, RTA s. 5 | Do not assume every pass-through is automatically void | | Deposit retained | RTA ss. 23–24, 35–39 and regulation | Inspections, forwarding address, consent, application/order, timing | | Entry without required notice | RTA s. 29; quiet enjoyment s. 28 | Statutory exception, notice contents/timing, consent, emergency | | Rent increase | RTA ss. 40–43.1 and regulation | Form, timing, amount, service, effective date, available remedy | | Adverse action after complaint | Facts, applicable notice ground, RTA ss. 5–7/28/47–49.2, human-rights or other law as engaged | There is no general RTA s. 47.1 retaliation provision in the current consolidation |
From dmang69/bc-legal-ai, MIT.
More from dmang69/bc-legal-ai
- 0.565score
counsel-research-draft-pipeline
dmang69
Use when researching and drafting BC legal documents.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.565score
critical-reading
dmang69
Skill for decomposing complex source documents — court decisions, academic papers, opposing affidavits, technical specifications, statutes, expert reports…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.519score
argument-architecture
dmang69
Structured argumentation skill — building rigorous arguments for legal submissions, thesis chapters, technical proposals, and anything requiring a defensible…
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.519score
bc-tenancy-advocacy
dmang69
BC tenancy advocacy advanced modules: judicial review escalation, human rights overlaps (BCHRT), strata/condo rentals, MHPTA manufactured home parks…
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.519score
bc-tenancy-procedure
dmang69
BC RTB procedure runtime: evidence packaging, witness prep, applications, negotiation, hearing strategy, document drafting, enforcement/collections.
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.515score
legal-file-assistant
dmang69
Combined Canadian court document downloader AND Windows local file search.
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.515score
learning-mode
dmang69
Tutoring mode: diagnose first; one question + one scaffold per turn; hold the line under answer-seeking; integrity for graded work.
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.515score
canadian-court-downloader
dmang69
Canadian court document retrieval, BOA builder, batch downloader, duplicate detector, and OCR extractor.
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.514score
bc-legislation-admin
dmang69
BC Legislation Administrator and Legal Statutory Analyst.
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.513score
bc-judicial-review-guide
dmang69
Use when BC RTB/tribunal JR, Form 66, stay, or ATA s.57/s.58 work is needed.
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.512score
cognitive-awareness
dmang69
Proactive metacognition companion to self-improvement: situational awareness, epistemic calibration, reasoning checks, assumption audits, curiosity, synthesis.
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.512score
critical-reading
dmang69
Decompose dense documents: court/RTB decisions, affidavits, papers, specs, contracts.
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 3
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Jul 23, 2026 (3 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/dmang69/bc-legal-ai
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from dmang69
- 0.565score
counsel-research-draft-pipeline
dmang69
Use when researching and drafting BC legal documents.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.565score
critical-reading
dmang69
Skill for decomposing complex source documents — court decisions, academic papers, opposing affidavits, technical specifications, statutes, expert reports…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.519score
bc-tenancy-advocacy
dmang69
BC tenancy advocacy advanced modules: judicial review escalation, human rights overlaps (BCHRT), strata/condo rentals, MHPTA manufactured home parks…
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.519score
bc-tenancy-procedure
dmang69
BC RTB procedure runtime: evidence packaging, witness prep, applications, negotiation, hearing strategy, document drafting, enforcement/collections.
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.519score
argument-architecture
dmang69
Structured argumentation skill — building rigorous arguments for legal submissions, thesis chapters, technical proposals, and anything requiring a defensible…
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.515score
learning-mode
dmang69
Tutoring mode: diagnose first; one question + one scaffold per turn; hold the line under answer-seeking; integrity for graded work.
SkillCFreshness: C★ 3Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get bc-tenancy-substantive running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
bc-tenancy-substantive skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/dmang69-bc-tenancy-substantive (last updated 2026-10-24)