pulumi-upgrade-provider
Automate Pulumi provider repo upgrades with the `upgrade-provider` tool.
Skill by corymhall
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying pulumi-upgrade-provider?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/corymhall-pulumi-upgrade-provider
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/pulumi-upgrade-provider
What's inside
- Skill name
pulumi-upgrade-provider- Description
- Automate Pulumi provider repo upgrades with the `upgrade-provider` tool. Use when upgrading a pulumi provider repository to a new upstream version, running `upgrade-provider`, and addressing its common failure modes like patch conflicts or missing module mappings.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 211 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (4)
- SKILL.md
- openai.yaml · agents/
- upgrade-provider-errors.md · references/
- use_cases.yaml
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Pulumi Upgrade Provider
## Overview
Run `upgrade-provider --no-submit`, fix known failures, and rerun until success. During the run loop, the tool owns branch and generated-commit state but does not push or mutate GitHub. After success, review and correct the local result before submitting it using the plan printed by the tool.
## Preflight
1. Record existing changes as the pre-upgrade baseline:
```bash
baseline_file="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/upgrade-provider-$(basename "$PWD")-baseline.txt"
git status --short --untracked-files=all | tee "$baseline_file"
```
Existing changes do not block the upgrade, but the tool stages broadly and may include them in generated commits. If practical, isolate clearly unrelated work in another branch or worktree, move local-only files, or add untracked local artifacts to `.git/info/exclude`. Otherwise proceed and carry this baseline into the final review. Do not add a repository `.gitignore` rule unless the path should be ignored for all contributors.
2. Keep the run log outside the repository so the tool cannot stage it.
## Run Loop
1. Run from repo root:
```bash
log_file="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/upgrade-provider-$(basename "$PWD").log"
upgrade-provider $ORG/$REPO --repo-path . --no-submit > "$log_file" 2> /dev/null
```
Preserve `--no-submit` on every retry.
2. Wait for completion (can take up to 10 minutes).
3. Check for errors by scanning the log for lines starting with `error: `:
```bash
if command -v rg >/dev/null 2>&1; then
rg -n '^error: ' "$log_file" || true
else
grep -n '^error: ' "$log_file" || true
fi
```
4. On a successful exit, first check whether the tool found that no upgrade was required:
```bash
if grep -Fq 'No actions needed' "$log_file"; then
echo 'No actions needed'
fi
```
If present, report that the provider is already current or the requested target is not an upgrade, then stop successfully. There is no local upgrade to review or submit.
5. Otherwise, extract and read the complete local-completion report from the captured stdout:
```bash
awk '/^Upgrade completed locally;/{found=1} found' "$log_file"
```
This includes the proposed PR body and metadata, review commands, and every skipped submission action.
6. If failed, fix using this skill's `references/upgrade-provider-errors.md` (from the skill folder, not the repo), then rerun with `--no-submit`. If upstream migrated from Terraform Plugin SDKv2 to Plugin Framework, use the migration-guide routing in that reference instead of treating the framework change alone as an architectural blocker. For upstream `go get` failures involving ignored `replace` directives or `unknown revision v0.0.0`, rerun with `--target-version` after applying the documented `provider/go.mod` replacements; preserve the original major/non-major intent and add `--major` only for actual major version upgrades.
7. If a fix requires creating/amending/removing/rebasing patches, use the `upstream-patches` skill for the patch workflow. Interrupted patch workflows must be checked in before rerunning.
8. If you fixed a conflict, report exact edits (file paths + concrete changes or preserved intent).
9. Repeat until the tool prints `No actions needed` or the local-completion report and proposed PR plan. This run must not push or mutate GitHub; a branch or PR from an earlier run may already exist.
## When to Stop and Report Failure
Stop iterating and report failure if any of these conditions are met:
1. **Command not found (exit code 127)**: The `upgrade-provider` tool is not in PATH.
2. **Same error 3 times**: You've attempted to fix the same error 3 times without success.
3. **Unknown error pattern**: The error is not covered in `references/upgrade-provider-errors.md` and you cannot determine a safe fix.
4. **Ambiguous patch state**: You cannot prove that every patch was applied and the target rebase completed.
5. **Requires human judgment**: The fix needs user input, such as choosing between multiple valid implementation approaches or making an architectural decision about module organization. Upstream breaking changes, deprecations, or framework migrations do not by themselves require stopping; stop only when implementing the upgrade presents an unresolved choice.
When stopping, report:
1. The error(s) encountered.
2. What fixes were attempted (with file paths and changes).
3. Why human intervention is needed.
4. Any partial progress.
## Review the Local Upgrade
Use the tool's final report as the source of truth for the base branch, working branch, proposed PR title/body/metadata, and skipped submission actions.
1. Review a bounded summary first:
```bash
default_branch=$(gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq .defaultBranchRef.name)
base_ref="origin/$default_branch"
git status --short --untracked-files=all
git log --oneline "$base_ref"..HEAD
git diff --shortstat "$base_ref"...HEAD
git diff --name-only "$base_ref"...HEAD | awk -F/ '{print $1}' | sort | uniq -c
```
Provider upgrades can change thousands of generated SDK files. Do not print the full branch diff by default. Use path-limited `git diff "$base_ref"...HEAD -- <paths>` commands to inspect source, configuration, patch, schema, and unexpected directories. For generated SDKs, inspect summaries or targeted files unless a full diff is necessary.
Cross-check the final branch against the pre-upgrade baseline:
```bash
baseline_file="${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/upgrade-provider-$(basename "$PWD")-baseline.txt"
[ ! -f "$baseline_file" ] || cat "$baseline_file"
```
For every pre-existing path included in the branch, decide whether it belongs in the upgrade PR. Keep intentional paths; move unrelated work to another branch/worktree or remove it from the unpublished upgrade history before pushing. A separate commit on the same branch isolates history but does not remove the path from the PR, and unstaging alone is insufficient after the tool has committed it. Revoke any exposed credential even if the history is rewritten.
2. MUST audit generated doc replacements for unresolved placeholders before publication:
```bash
if [ -f provider/replacements.json ]; then
if command -v rg >/dev/null 2>&1; then
rg -n '"new":.*TODO|TODO' provider/replacements.json || true
else
grep -En '"new":.*TODO|TODO' provider/replacements.json || true
fi
fi
```
If any `TODO` is found in `provider/replacements.json`:From corymhall/toolkit, MIT.
More from corymhall/toolkit
- 0.529score
harness-evaluation
corymhall
Evaluate real Pi and Codex sessions against centralized criteria for personal and repo-local skills, identify whether skills helped, were neutral, or made…
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.526score
skill-authoring
corymhall
Create, revise, de-slopify, or review Agent Skills while preserving useful behavior and requiring evidence for added prompt weight.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.526score
triage-provider-issue
corymhall
Triage Pulumi provider issues from evidence to disposition or next action.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.526score
go-development
corymhall
Implement and refactor Go where package design, abstractions, ownership, errors, concurrency, or Go-specific test seams require manual judgment.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
capture-decision-context
corymhall
Distill the current conversation into a durable, implementation-light decision note or compact GitHub issue draft that preserves motivation, evidence…
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
commit
corymhall
Create a well-formed git commit from current changes using session history for rationale and summary; use only when the user explicitly asks to create or…
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
collaborate
corymhall
Establish a pair-programming working agreement for the session.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.519score
aws-documentation-mcp
corymhall
Search, read, and cite official AWS documentation through the AWS Labs Documentation connection in executor.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.479score
bridge-parity-investigation
corymhall
Investigate established Pulumi-vs-Terraform parity gaps with bridge cross-tests.
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9 - 0.479score
stage-pulumi-provider-repro
corymhall
Stage durable Pulumi-side repros for provider issues.
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9 - 0.479score
stage-terraform-provider-repro
corymhall
Stage durable Terraform-side repros for bridged-provider issues.
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9 - 0.476score
neovim-plugin-development
corymhall
Implement, refactor, modernize, and debug Neovim plugins in Lua using official runtimepath/module-loading, startup/lazy-loading, keymap/autocmd, health…
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Jul 24, 2026 (3 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/corymhall/toolkit
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from corymhall
- 0.529score
harness-evaluation
corymhall
Evaluate real Pi and Codex sessions against centralized criteria for personal and repo-local skills, identify whether skills helped, were neutral, or made…
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.526score
triage-provider-issue
corymhall
Triage Pulumi provider issues from evidence to disposition or next action.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.526score
skill-authoring
corymhall
Create, revise, de-slopify, or review Agent Skills while preserving useful behavior and requiring evidence for added prompt weight.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.526score
go-development
corymhall
Implement and refactor Go where package design, abstractions, ownership, errors, concurrency, or Go-specific test seams require manual judgment.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
capture-decision-context
corymhall
Distill the current conversation into a durable, implementation-light decision note or compact GitHub issue draft that preserves motivation, evidence…
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
commit
corymhall
Create a well-formed git commit from current changes using session history for rationale and summary; use only when the user explicitly asks to create or…
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get pulumi-upgrade-provider running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
pulumi-upgrade-provider skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/corymhall-pulumi-upgrade-provider (last updated 2026-10-24)