show-me-your-work
Use for long-running work that needs a decision trail.
Skill by Cloeille
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying show-me-your-work?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/cloeille-show-me-your-work
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
- Runs as
- Shell scripts
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/show-me-your-work
What's inside
- Skill name
show-me-your-work- Description
- Use for long-running work that needs a decision trail.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 78 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
Files (3)
- SKILL.md
- decision-log-template.tsv · references/
- log.sh · scripts/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Show me your work Keep one canonical log. ## The format A single TSV file, one row per decision. Cells stay single-line. Evidence is a pointer, not prose. Copy `references/decision-log-template.tsv` (the header row) to start a clean log. Columns: - **ts.** ISO8601 timestamp. - **phase.** The phase or workstream. - **decision.** What was chosen or done, one line. - **why.** The reason in plain words. If a principle drove it, say it plainly, not as a jargon tag. - **evidence.** A link or path that proves it: commit SHA, PR number, `file:line`, or an artifact, trace, or screenshot path. Never a paragraph. - **result.** The outcome or predicate state: `tests green`, `reverted`, `pixel-diff 0`, `INCONCLUSIVE`, `open`. An example, plain-spoken so a reviewer reads it at a glance. ``` ts phase decision why evidence result 2026-05-24T09:02:00Z frame counted the work first, about 100 components and roughly 75 hours wanted to know the size before starting a long run commit 3a9f1c2 found 5 things to sort out before starting 2026-05-24T09:40:00Z harness took screenshots of the old version before changing anything so we can compare old against new and catch any visual change scripts/snapshot.sh, baseline/ saved 120 reference screenshots 2026-05-24T11:15:00Z widget moved the widget styles over without changing how it looks keep the change small and the result identical commit 7c21e0a, pixel-diff 0 looks identical, tests pass 2026-05-24T12:30:00Z widget threw out a helper's work because its screenshots were blank checked the real files instead of trusting its summary worktree reset reverted, tightened the instructions for next time ``` ## Logging a row Write each entry the way you'd tell a teammate what you did. Plain words, concrete actions, no AI speak or abstract jargon (the **unslop** skill applies to log text too). Use the helper `scripts/log.sh <logfile> <phase> <decision> <why> <evidence> <result>`. It stamps `ts`, writes the header on first use, strips stray tabs/newlines, and prefixes any cell starting with `=`, `+`, `-`, or `@` with a single quote. A bare `printf` appending a row works too, but mind those same bytes if cells come from generated or user-supplied text. Log decision points and checkpoints, not every action: a fork chosen, a unit completed with its verification result, a pivot or revert with its trigger, a blocker surfaced, a gate fixed. For loop runs, one row per iteration. Skip the trivial and self-evident. A run is one agent conversation, including its later turns and any summary of it. A pickup, a replacement agent, or a new chat starts a new run. When a run adds to a log that already has rows, its first row has phase `start`, and so does its first row after another run's `start` row. So a run that comes back to a log in a later turn first reads the log's last rows to see whether another run wrote since. A `start` row names the `ts` range of the rows before it that this run did not write, and its evidence names this run, such as its agent id. Use phase `start` for nothing else. ## Where it lives By default the log is a working artifact, not committed. Keep it at `decisions.tsv` in the work dir, or `.audit/<task-slug>.tsv` when several efforts run at once, and leave it out of git. Commit it only when the work is ambitious enough that a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. ## Rules - Append-only. A wrong call gets a new row that supersedes it. Never edit or delete history. - Prefer evidence produced by committed scripts over hand-made one-offs (the **encode-lessons-in-structure** principle skill). ## Audit the log against the transcript At the end of the run, before handing back, check the log told the truth. Read this run's transcript with the `session_search` tool, scoped to this run's session. Never glob raw transcript files or reach into another profile's session history. Walk this run's rows against what actually happened. Each stretch of them begins at one of this run's `start` rows, or at the first row if this run created the log, and ends at the next `start` row of another run: - Check that every row maps to a real decision or action. - Check that each row's evidence resolves and shows what the row claims. - A fork, pivot, or abandoned approach that shaped the work but isn't logged is a gap. Add it. Correct the log, not the story. The audit never edits or removes a row, even an invented one. When a row records neither a real decision nor a real action, or its claim or evidence is wrong, add a row that supersedes it with what actually happened and a pointer that resolves. This audit does not check rows outside this run's stretches. If this run's own work shows one of them is wrong, supersede it like any wrong call. ## Cross-model review of the trail Before handing back, spawn a subagent on a different model family from the one that did the work. Self-review is not a substitute. The subagent reads the audit trail and the run's transcript, then flags what the user should pay attention to. Not a redo of the work, a scan for what's suboptimal or risky. - Decisions logged with weak or absent evidence. - Verification steps skipped or claimed without proof in the transcript. - Choices that look risky in hindsight (premature, scope-creeping, papering over a symptom). - Gaps the user would otherwise miss on a casual skim. Every reply for a run that produced a trail ends with an "Attention" section. Lead with the reviewer's model on its own line (`reviewed by <model>`), then list each flag pointing to specific rows or moments. "No flags" is a valid value. The model name is not. ## Reviewing the trail Read top to bottom, follow the evidence pointers, spot-check. GitHub renders a committed TSV as a table. `column -s$'\t' -t decisions.tsv` renders it in a terminal. ## Composing this skill Other skills route their audit trail here instead of inventing one. Reference it by name and let it own the format. Don't restate the columns.
From Cloeille/pstack, MIT.
More from Cloeille/pstack
- 0.635score
reflect
Cloeille
Use when asked to reflect: route learnings into skills.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.635score
typescript-best-practices
Cloeille
Use when reading or editing TypeScript code.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.630score
technical-writing
Cloeille
Use when writing or editing technical docs or READMEs.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.630score
no-comments
Cloeille
Use to remove needless code comments via Comment Sicko.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.630score
figure-it-out
Cloeille
Use when no playbook fits: design an auditable one first.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.630score
create-verification-skill
Cloeille
Generate a project-local skill that drives the real app.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.628score
deslop
Cloeille
Remove AI-generated code slop from a diff before committing.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.625score
swarm
Cloeille
Fan out parallel workers via delegate_task, drain, report.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.625score
principle-encode-lessons-in-structure
Cloeille
Apply when writing the same instruction twice: encode it.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.625score
how
Cloeille
Use to explain how code works, with walkthroughs.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.625score
architect
Cloeille
Design types and module structure before writing code.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.625score
maintain-verification-skill
Cloeille
Use to resync a project's verification skill with its app.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 12
- Forks
- 5
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 23, 2026 (7 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 23, 2026 (7 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/Cloeille/pstack
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from Cloeille
- 0.635score
reflect
Cloeille
Use when asked to reflect: route learnings into skills.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.635score
typescript-best-practices
Cloeille
Use when reading or editing TypeScript code.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.630score
create-verification-skill
Cloeille
Generate a project-local skill that drives the real app.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.630score
no-comments
Cloeille
Use to remove needless code comments via Comment Sicko.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.630score
figure-it-out
Cloeille
Use when no playbook fits: design an auditable one first.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9 - 0.630score
technical-writing
Cloeille
Use when writing or editing technical docs or READMEs.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 12Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get show-me-your-work running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
show-me-your-work skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/cloeille-show-me-your-work (last updated 2026-10-24)