Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/broneq-bdk-test-tools
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: testing
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/bdk-test-tools
Tools it pre-approves 2
From allowed-tools in SKILL.md: the agent may use these without asking you each time.
Bash(python3${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/*)
What's inside
- Skill name
bdk-test-tools- Description
- Project-configured test commands from .bdk/settings.json. Preloaded into agents that run tests; not user-facing.
- License
- MIT
- Allowed tools
- Bash(python3, ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/*)
- Instructions
- 31 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Pre-approves some shell commands
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
Test command(s) for this project, one block per tier:
!`python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/get_settings.py test-tools`
If the line above reads `run the project's test suite`, `.bdk/settings.json` is not configured — emit one warning line `[bdk] .bdk/settings.json not configured — run /bdk:setup` then detect from project files (`package.json` scripts, `Makefile`, `pyproject.toml`, `go.mod`, `Cargo.toml`, etc.) and proceed under the same policy below.
## Pick the form, not just the command
Each block names a tier and up to four forms of the same command. `{files}` is a placeholder: replace it with the space-separated paths you were given, quoted.
| Form | Run it when |
|---|---|
| `scoped` | **Default.** You were given file paths, or you know which test files matter. |
| `related` | You were given *source* paths and need the tests covering them. Use this instead of asking another agent which tests cover a change — the runner computes it in a second. |
| `failed` | Re-running after a fix, when the previous run in this session already failed. |
| `full` | Only when the caller explicitly asked for a full suite. |
If a block has no `scoped` form, derive one from `full` by appending the paths the runner accepts (`<full> -- {files}` for an npm/yarn/pnpm script, a bare path list for most direct runners). Say in your report that you derived it, so the settings can be fixed once instead of re-derived forever.
## Tier policy
- If **every** path you were given is non-executable content (yaml/md/json/plain config not feeding build or codegen), do not run any tier at all - report `nothing to verify for these paths: <list>` instead. Build-feeding config (tsconfig, lockfiles, codegen schemas) counts as source.
- A `fast` tier is cheap: run it scoped whenever you have paths.
- An `e2e` tier is the most expensive thing in the pipeline. Run it **only** when either the caller passed you e2e spec paths (because the work touched those specs), or the caller explicitly asked for the end-of-run full gate. Never reach for an e2e tier on your own initiative because a change "might" affect a flow.
- **The unscoped `full` form of any tier runs once per plan, at the end-of-plan gate.** Everywhere else — per task, per group, per fix cycle — is scoped, related, or failed. If you cannot scope a tier you were asked to run and the caller did not ask for a full run, report that rather than silently running everything.
## Reporting
Always name the exact command you ran (form and substituted paths) alongside the pass/fail counts. A caller deciding whether a later result still stands needs to know what was actually covered, and "tests passed" without a scope is not an answer.From broneq/bdk, MIT.
More from broneq/bdk
- 0.592score
explain-complex-code
broneq
Generate comprehensive architecture documentation for complex code modules with Mermaid diagrams and examples.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
cr
broneq
Run code review with dynamic agent scaling (3-13 agents based on change size).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
mermaid-drawer
broneq
BDK's shared Mermaid standard - diagram type selection, node budget, and a palette verified legible in light and dark themes.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
pr-review
broneq
Review GitHub PRs from URLs - templated inline comments, summary, and a verdict you confirm/override before it posts via gh.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
design
broneq
Design partner for any feature.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
create-adr
broneq
Create Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) based on MADR template.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
agent-lint
broneq
Lint a BDK agent file for best practices and portability.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
debug
broneq
Debug issues through structured investigation, failing test creation, and targeted fixes.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.586score
create-plan
broneq
Create comprehensive implementation plan with exploration and trade-off analysis
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
bdk-lint-tools
broneq
Project-configured lint/format/typecheck commands from .bdk/settings.json.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
add-rule
broneq
Capture one lesson or convention as a properly-homed rule — routed to .claude/rules/, a doc comment, or a test signpost; dedupes and respects budgets.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.583score
skill-lint
broneq
Lint a BDK skill or agent file for best practices and portability.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 6
- Last commit (this folder)
- Aug 21, 2026 (2 months ago)
- Last release
- Sep 25, 2026 (1 month ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/broneq/bdk
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from broneq
- 0.592score
explain-complex-code
broneq
Generate comprehensive architecture documentation for complex code modules with Mermaid diagrams and examples.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
pr-review
broneq
Review GitHub PRs from URLs - templated inline comments, summary, and a verdict you confirm/override before it posts via gh.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
cr
broneq
Run code review with dynamic agent scaling (3-13 agents based on change size).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
design
broneq
Design partner for any feature.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
mermaid-drawer
broneq
BDK's shared Mermaid standard - diagram type selection, node budget, and a palette verified legible in light and dark themes.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
agent-lint
broneq
Lint a BDK agent file for best practices and portability.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9
Cite this page
bdk-test-tools skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/broneq-bdk-test-tools (last updated 2026-10-24)