model-card
Use when a trained medical-imaging model needs its documentation.
Skill by Aperivue
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying model-card?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/aperivue-model-card
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: data
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
- Runs as
- Python package
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/model-card
What's inside
- Skill name
model-card- Description
- Use when a trained medical-imaging model needs its documentation. Fills a Model Card and a Datasheet for its dataset from facts you supply, adds a METRIC-informed data-quality pass and gates that no required section is empty. Never invents numbers, provenance or licence.
- License
- MIT
- Metadata
- triggers: model card, model cards, datasheet, datasheet for datasets, dataset documentation, model documentation, hugging face card, model metadata, intended use, out-of-scope, data quality, METRIC framework, model reporting, document a model
- Instructions
- 99 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
Files (12)
- SKILL.md
- datasheet_template.md · references/
- metric_dimensions.md · references/
- model_card_template.md · references/
- check_model_card_complete.py · scripts/
- DATASHEET.md · scripts/check_model_card_complete_challenge/fixture/complete/
- MODEL_CARD.md · scripts/check_model_card_complete_challenge/fixture/complete/
- MODEL_CARD.md · scripts/check_model_card_complete_challenge/fixture/incomplete/
- problem.md · scripts/check_model_card_complete_challenge/
- verify.sh · scripts/check_model_card_complete_challenge/
- skill.yml
- test_model_card_complete.sh · tests/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Model-Card Skill
## Purpose
This skill produces the **documentation an engineer-built medical-imaging model must carry**: a
**Model Card** (intended use, out-of-scope use, training data, per-subgroup performance, caveats), a
**Datasheet** for its dataset (provenance, composition, collection, labelling, consent), and a
**METRIC-informed data-quality pass**. It fills the templates **from facts the user supplies** — it
never invents a number, a provenance detail, a consent status, or a licence — and ships a deterministic
gate that no required section is missing or left as an unfilled `[NEEDS INPUT]` placeholder.
It is the **reporting** seam of the model-engineering lane: after `/model-assessment` audits the design
and produces the numbers, this skill records them in a portable, auditable card that
`/write-paper` and `/check-reporting` consume. It mirrors `/version-dataset` structurally (generate +
deterministic verify).
## When to use
- A trained model needs a Model Card / Datasheet for a repo, Hugging Face card, or manuscript supplement.
## When NOT to use
- Auditing the validation design / metrics → `/model-assessment`.
- Versioning the dataset bytes → `/version-dataset`; tabular variable docs → `/generate-codebook`.
- Item-by-item reporting-guideline compliance of the manuscript → `/check-reporting`.
- Building / training the model → `/model-scaffold`.
## Workflow
### Phase 1 — Collect the facts
Gather, from the user / the model's developers: task + architecture + provenance + licence; intended use
and out-of-scope use; training and evaluation cohorts; the reference standard and inter-reader agreement;
overall and **per-subgroup** performance; data collection, consent, and de-identification. Anything not
supplied stays `[NEEDS INPUT]` — never guess.
### Phase 2 — Fill the Model Card
Copy `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/model_card_template.md` to `MODEL_CARD.md` and fill each section
from the facts. Keep the headings. Numbers come only from `/model-assessment` / executed results.
### Phase 3 — Fill the Datasheet
Copy `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/datasheet_template.md` to `DATASHEET.md` and fill the seven
question groups (Motivation, Composition, Collection, Preprocessing/Labeling, Uses, Distribution,
Maintenance).
### Phase 4 — METRIC data-quality pass
Walk `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/metric_dimensions.md` (completeness, correctness, consistency,
representativeness, timeliness, provenance, label provenance, fairness/coverage, leakage safety) and
record each finding in the Datasheet. Anything that affects the headline metric's validity is also a
`/model-assessment` finding — cross-check there.
### Phase 5 — Verify completeness (deterministic gate)
```bash
python3 ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/check_model_card_complete.py \
--card MODEL_CARD.md --datasheet DATASHEET.md --strict
```
`MISSING_SECTION` / `EMPTY_REQUIRED_SECTION` / `UNFILLED_FIELD` must be zero before the card ships.
`UNFILLED_FIELD` names each field of a required section still left as `[NEEDS INPUT]` / `[VERIFY]`
(e.g. License or subgroup performance), even when a sibling field is filled. An explicit `N/A` /
`None` counts as an answer only as a field's whole value, and never in Intended Use, Training Data,
Evaluation Data, Metrics or Quantitative Analyses. Only the template tokens as written
(`[NEEDS INPUT ...]`, `[VERIFY]`, `[VERIFY: ...]`, upper case) count; markdown link text such as
`[verify the protocol](https://...)` or `[Verify][ref]`, and anything inside an HTML comment or a
fenced code block, is not a placeholder.
Known limits: a field left as a hand-written `TODO` / `TBD` / `<...>` / `XXXX` is caught only when
the whole section is unfilled; keep the template's bracketed `[NEEDS INPUT]` markers for open fields.
### Phase 6 — Hand off
Carry the card into `/write-paper` (the Methods / supplement reference it), `/check-reporting`
(CLAIM 2024 / TRIPOD+AI item audit of the manuscript), and `/self-review`.
## Anti-Hallucination
- **Never invent evaluation numbers, subgroup results, or dataset provenance.** Every figure comes from
`/model-assessment` or the user's executed results; every provenance / consent / licence statement is
user-confirmed. Unknown → `[NEEDS INPUT]`, which the gate flags.
- **Never mark a section complete without user-supplied content**, and never auto-fill a placeholder to
pass the gate.
- **Never assert a licence or consent status the user did not confirm.**
- The gate checks **presence**, not truth — a complete card can still contain a wrong number; validity
is `/model-assessment` and the human's responsibility.
## Deterministic gate
`scripts/check_model_card_complete.py` — verifies every required Model Card / Datasheet section is
present and non-empty (stdlib, network-free). Reproducible challenge:
`bash ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/check_model_card_complete_challenge/verify.sh`.
## Note on classification
Model Cards (Mitchell et al. 2019) and Datasheets (Gebru et al. 2021) are **documentation standards**,
not clinical reporting guidelines, so they live here as `references/` **templates** (uncounted), not in
`/check-reporting`'s counted checklist set — the same way `appraisal_tools/METRICS.md` is kept separate.
`/check-reporting` still owns the manuscript-level CLAIM 2024 / TRIPOD+AI item audit.
## Boundaries
```
model-assessment (audit design + metrics)
└─ model-card (this skill: Model Card + Datasheet + METRIC pass, completeness-gated)
└─ write-paper + check-reporting (manuscript) ; version-dataset (dataset bytes)
```From Aperivue/medsci-skills, MIT.
More from Aperivue/medsci-skills
- 0.779score
deidentify
Aperivue
Use when clinical data may contain PHI and must be de-identified before any LLM-assisted analysis.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
design-ai-benchmarking
Aperivue
Use when designing a study that benchmarks AI systems against a human-expert panel, before data collection.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
contribute
Aperivue
Use when sending local changes back to the project (an added journal profile, a fixed checklist item, an adapted skill) or reporting a false positive or bug.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
define-variables
Aperivue
Use when exposure, outcome, covariate or eligibility definitions and cutoffs need a citable basis before the protocol.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
add-journal
Aperivue
Use when a target journal has no profile yet.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
calc-sample-size
Aperivue
Use when planning how many patients or cases a study needs before data collection (power analysis, IRB justification).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
review-paper
Aperivue
Use when writing a literature review article (narrative, scoping PRISMA-ScR or systematic).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
author-strategy
Aperivue
Use when analyzing a researcher's publication record from PubMed.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
academic-aio
Aperivue
Use when a medical AI paper should be found and cited by AI search engines and RAG tools.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
check-reporting
Aperivue
Use when auditing a manuscript item by item against a reporting guideline or risk-of-bias tool.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
clean-data
Aperivue
Use when a clinical CSV/Excel dataset needs profiling and cleaning before analysis (missing values, outliers, duplicates, type mismatches).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
design-study
Aperivue
Use when checking a radiology or medical AI study design before drafting or submission.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 349
- Forks
- 83
- Open issues
- 4
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 4, 2026 (27 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 4, 2026 (27 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills
- Website
- aperivue.com/skills
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from Aperivue
- 0.779score
review-paper
Aperivue
Use when writing a literature review article (narrative, scoping PRISMA-ScR or systematic).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
author-strategy
Aperivue
Use when analyzing a researcher's publication record from PubMed.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
academic-aio
Aperivue
Use when a medical AI paper should be found and cited by AI search engines and RAG tools.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
add-journal
Aperivue
Use when a target journal has no profile yet.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
calc-sample-size
Aperivue
Use when planning how many patients or cases a study needs before data collection (power analysis, IRB justification).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
check-reporting
Aperivue
Use when auditing a manuscript item by item against a reporting guideline or risk-of-bias tool.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get model-card running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
model-card skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/aperivue-model-card (last updated 2026-10-24)