author-strategy
Use when analyzing a researcher's publication record from PubMed.
Skill by Aperivue
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/aperivue-author-strategy
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: documents
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
- Runs as
- Python package
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/author-strategy
What's inside
- Skill name
author-strategy- Description
- Use when analyzing a researcher's publication record from PubMed. Fetches an author's papers, classifies study types and author position, charts the patterns and writes a strategy report, with an optional trajectory-archetype classification. Works from PubMed metadata only.
- License
- MIT
- Metadata
- triggers: author-strategy, 저자 분석, publication analysis, 다작 분석, 연구 전략 분석, author profile, reverse engineer strategy, trajectory archetype, career archetype
- Instructions
- 160 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
Files (12)
- SKILL.md
- analyze_patterns.py
- classify_archetypes.py
- fetch_pubmed.py
- pubmed_parse.py
- trajectory_archetypes.md · references/
- trajectory_archetypes.yaml · references/
- render_archetype_doc.py
- skill.yml
- sample_corpus.csv · tests/fixtures/
- two_samesurname_authors.xml · tests/fixtures/
- test_archetype_classifier.sh · tests/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# /author-strategy — PubMed Author Strategy Analysis
Work from PubMed metadata and the title/abstract text already fetched — nothing else. Do not
retrieve full text, follow external links, or resolve preprints. Signals that need citations,
citation half-life, venue-impact tier, repository/preprint links, or corresponding-author role are
`unavailable` and surface as `[VERIFY]` — never inferred.
## Prerequisites
- Python 3.10+ with `biopython`, `pandas`, `matplotlib`, `seaborn`, and `pyyaml` (PyYAML is required by the archetype classifier and the rubric renderer)
- Scripts: `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/fetch_pubmed.py`, `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/analyze_patterns.py`, `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/pubmed_parse.py` (stdlib parser), `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/classify_archetypes.py`, `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/render_archetype_doc.py`
- Rubric: `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/trajectory_archetypes.yaml` (canonical) and `${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/trajectory_archetypes.md` (generated)
## Workflow
### Step 1: Gather Input
Ask the user for:
1. **Author name** (PubMed format, e.g., "Kim DK" or "Lee KS")
2. **Last name** for position classification (auto-detected if ambiguous)
3. **Output directory** (default: `~/.local/cache/author-strategy/{AuthorName}/`)
4. **Email** for NCBI E-utilities (passed as `--email`)
### Step 2: Fetch PubMed Data
```bash
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/fetch_pubmed.py" "{Author Name}" \
--last-name "{LastName}" \
--output "{output_dir}/data/{name}_publications.csv" \
--email "{user_email}"
```
Review the console summary (total count, study type distribution, author position).
If count is 0, suggest alternative name formats (e.g., "Kim DK" vs "Kim D" vs the full first
name) rather than generating data.
### Step 3: Generate Visualizations and Report
```bash
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/analyze_patterns.py" "{output_dir}/data/{name}_publications.csv" \
--output-dir "{output_dir}/report/" \
--author-name "{Author Name}"
```
This produces 7 PNG charts (01-07) and `analysis_report.md` with the strategy breakdown.
Study types come from the keyword rules in `pubmed_parse.py`, first match in this order: GBD,
SR/MA, NHIS/Claims, Cross-national, National survey, Biobank, AI/ML, Clinical trial, Case report,
Letter/Commentary; anything else is "Other". Present the script's labels as they are — never
reclassify a paper by guess.
### Step 4: Interpret and Present
Read `analysis_report.md` and present to the user; every count and rate comes from that
report or the fetched CSV, never from memory:
1. **Executive summary**: total publications, growth trajectory, most frequent journals (venue-impact tier is `unavailable` — never present a "high-tier" rate)
2. **Primary strategy**: what study type dominates and why
3. **Author position analysis**: first/last positional rate vs middle (positional heuristic only — not leadership or corresponding-author metadata, which are unavailable here)
4. **Topic clusters**: research focus areas
5. **ROI quadrant**: which study types combine volume with first/last positional rate (chart 07; no venue-tier axis)
6. **Replication opportunities**: which patterns are replicable with Claude Code + public databases
State the classifier's limits when they matter: it is tuned for Korean epidemiology and public
health researchers and may undercount specialized study types in other fields, and NHIS studies
that lack its keywords fall into "Other".
Known limits: a supplied `--orcid` or `--initials` that contradicts every same-surname author on
a paper yields `match_basis` `orcid-conflict` / `initials-conflict` and position `unknown` (a
namesake is never attributed). The `journal_tier` CSV column always reads `unavailable [VERIFY]`.
The A3 reporting-quality term list no longer contains `claim` (it matched "claims database"), so
papers naming only the CLAIM checklist do not count toward `dual_mode_corpus`.
### Step 5: Optional — MA Gap Identification
If the user asks "what MA topics are feasible with this professor?":
- Cross-reference topic clusters with the user's existing MA plans
- Identify gaps where the professor has domain expertise but no MA published
- Output a prioritized list of MA proposals
## Optional: Trajectory-Archetype Classification
An opt-in path that classifies the trajectory into abstract career archetypes (A1–A6 + a
composite) as an **explainable, multi-label, confidence-scored heuristic — not an objective
verdict**, using the canonical rubric `references/trajectory_archetypes.yaml`.
### Step 6: Disambiguation Gate (required before classification)
A surname alone never resolves an author. Pass disambiguators so the target author is uniquely
attributed:
```bash
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/fetch_pubmed.py" "{Author Name}" \
--initials "{Initials}" --orcid "{ORCID}" \
--affiliation "{Institution}" --year-from "{YYYY}" --year-to "{YYYY}" \
--output "{output_dir}/data/{name}_publications.csv" --email "{user_email}"
```
This writes the CSV, a `candidates.json` of affiliation/year candidate clusters, and a
`corpus_manifest.json` with `review_status: pending`. **Present the candidate clusters to
the user for review.** The user decides include/exclude. Only after the user has reviewed
the clusters do you finalize and approve the corpus (the `--approve` flag is a human gate
— never set it without explicit user review/approval):
```bash
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/fetch_pubmed.py" "{Author Name}" \
--initials "{Initials}" --affiliation "{Institution}" \
--include-pmids "{included.txt}" --exclude-pmids "{excluded.txt}" --approve \
--output "{output_dir}/data/{name}_publications.csv" --email "{user_email}"
```
The manifest is cryptographically bound to the CSV (`csv_sha256` + `pmid_set_hash`); the
classifier refuses to run on an unapproved or mismatched corpus.
### Step 7: Run the Classifier and Present
```bash
python "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/classify_archetypes.py" \
"{output_dir}/data/{name}_publications.csv" \From Aperivue/medsci-skills, MIT.
More from Aperivue/medsci-skills
- 0.779score
design-ai-benchmarking
Aperivue
Use when designing a study that benchmarks AI systems against a human-expert panel, before data collection.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
design-study
Aperivue
Use when checking a radiology or medical AI study design before drafting or submission.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
deidentify
Aperivue
Use when clinical data may contain PHI and must be de-identified before any LLM-assisted analysis.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
academic-aio
Aperivue
Use when a medical AI paper should be found and cited by AI search engines and RAG tools.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
add-journal
Aperivue
Use when a target journal has no profile yet.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
calc-sample-size
Aperivue
Use when planning how many patients or cases a study needs before data collection (power analysis, IRB justification).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
review-paper
Aperivue
Use when writing a literature review article (narrative, scoping PRISMA-ScR or systematic).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
define-variables
Aperivue
Use when exposure, outcome, covariate or eligibility definitions and cutoffs need a citable basis before the protocol.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
check-reporting
Aperivue
Use when auditing a manuscript item by item against a reporting guideline or risk-of-bias tool.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
clean-data
Aperivue
Use when a clinical CSV/Excel dataset needs profiling and cleaning before analysis (missing values, outliers, duplicates, type mismatches).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
contribute
Aperivue
Use when sending local changes back to the project (an added journal profile, a fixed checklist item, an adapted skill) or reporting a false positive or bug.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
fill-icmje-coi
Aperivue
Use when each author needs an ICMJE Conflict of Interest disclosure form (coi_disclosure.docx) for submission.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9
Compare and alternatives
Featured in
Signals
- Stars
- 349
- Forks
- 83
- Open issues
- 4
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 2, 2026 (26 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 4, 2026 (24 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills
- Website
- aperivue.com/skills
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from Aperivue
- 0.779score
review-paper
Aperivue
Use when writing a literature review article (narrative, scoping PRISMA-ScR or systematic).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
check-reporting
Aperivue
Use when auditing a manuscript item by item against a reporting guideline or risk-of-bias tool.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
academic-aio
Aperivue
Use when a medical AI paper should be found and cited by AI search engines and RAG tools.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
add-journal
Aperivue
Use when a target journal has no profile yet.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
calc-sample-size
Aperivue
Use when planning how many patients or cases a study needs before data collection (power analysis, IRB justification).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9 - 0.779score
clean-data
Aperivue
Use when a clinical CSV/Excel dataset needs profiling and cleaning before analysis (missing values, outliers, duplicates, type mismatches).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 349Claude Code +9
Cite this page
author-strategy skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/aperivue-author-strategy (last updated 2026-10-24)