Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

AGENTS.md · zauberzeug/nicegui

AGENTS.md from zauberzeug/nicegui: 41 lines covering Pair Programming, What to Avoid, Before Claiming a Task Complete, Creating Pull Requests and more.

Template by zauberzeug

IndexedMIT★ 16,311
Write a review

Install

Works with Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Claude Code. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zauberzeug/nicegui/main/AGENTS.md -o AGENTS.md

Read it and adapt it to your project before use.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

The AGENTS.md file that zauberzeug/nicegui (16,311 stars) keeps for coding agents. It has 41 lines in 5 sections: Pair Programming; What to Avoid; Before Claiming a Task Complete; Creating Pull Requests; Reviewing Pull Requests. Use it as a model for your own project's instructions.

Use cases: prompt-engineering, code-generation

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

What's in it

An AGENTS.md file: instructions coding agents (Codex, Cursor, Copilot, Gemini CLI and others) read before working in a repo.

For
Codex, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Claude Code
Length
41 lines
File
AGENTS.md

Sections

  1. Pair Programming
  2. What to Avoid
  3. Before Claiming a Task Complete
  4. Creating Pull Requests
  5. Reviewing Pull Requests

First lines (shown under the repo's MIT license)

# AI Agent Guidelines for NiceGUI

This file gives AI assistants project-specific behavioral guidance. For coding standards, see [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md).

## Pair Programming

Work as a pair programmer, not a silent code generator:

- **Think from first principles**: Don't settle for the first solution; question assumptions about the true nature of the problem.
- **Requirements first**: Verify requirements before implementing, especially when writing or changing tests.
- **Research before guessing**: Search the codebase for similar patterns; check online sources for verification.
- **Discuss before deciding**: When strategy is unclear, present options and trade-offs to the user instead of choosing silently.
- **Step-by-step for large changes**: Break down significant refactorings and get confirmation along the way.
- **Challenge assumptions**: If the user states something untrue, correct them directly.

## What to Avoid

- **Hard-wrapping prose on GitHub** — in issues, pull requests and comments, GitHub renders every line break, so keep each paragraph on a single line.
- **Overwriting `.env` files** without explicit user confirmation
- **Creating new files** when editing existing ones would suffice
- **Global mutable state** in library code
- **Unnecessary dependencies** — check if existing code suffices first
- **Reflexive regression tests** — not every bug fix earns a test, and a test coupled to implementation details can be worse than none.
  Assert observable behavior, not internals: no private attributes, no patched machinery, no fake objects mirroring the code under test.
  If you catch yourself building scaffolding to observe an internal mechanism, stop — find the user-visible effect to assert on, or skip the test and give the reason in the pull request.
  Before writing a test, read a recent one in the same file and copy its shape.
  (Details in [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md#coding-conventions).)

## Before Claiming a Task Complete

Run the project's tests and linters (see [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md)) and review your own diff for unintended scope creep.

## Creating Pull Requests

Always use the repository's PR template ([`.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md`](.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md)) with its **Motivation**, **Implementation**, and **Progress** sections.
Do not invent alternative formats like "Summary" or "Test plan".

## Reviewing Pull Requests

Follow [REVIEW.md](REVIEW.md) — it lists what to look for, defines the severity vocabulary, and sets the tone for reviews.

Signals

Stars
16,311
Forks
964
Open issues
15
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 12, 2026 (17 days ago)
Last release
Oct 7, 2026 (22 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026
Cite this page

AGENTS.md · zauberzeug/nicegui. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/templates/zauberzeug-nicegui-agents-md (last updated 2026-10-24)