Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

review

Review and judgement router: evidence-based local code review, self-reflection, idea critique (roast, challenge), human-perspective checks (human-review…

Skill by youlianvr

IndexedCC-BY-4.0★ 14
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/youlianvr-review

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Review and judgement router: evidence-based local code review, self-reflection, idea critique (roast, challenge), human-perspective checks (human-review, think-like-human), learning from outcomes (self-learning), and verification passes (verify, diagnosing-bugs). Use when the task is to critically evaluate work — yours or the agent's — or to run a structured review pass. One contract; the parts under parts/ carry the methods — open the ones the task needs.

Use cases: documents, productivity, agent-building

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found
Runs as
Python package

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/review

What's inside

Skill name
review
Description
Review and judgement router: evidence-based local code review, self-reflection, idea critique (roast, challenge), human-perspective checks (human-review, think-like-human), learning from outcomes (self-learning), and verification passes (verify, diagnosing-bugs). Use when the task is to critically evaluate work — yours or the agent's — or to run a structured review pass. One contract; the parts under parts/ carry the methods — open the ones the task needs.
License
CC-BY-4.0
Instructions
55 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Before installing

  • Ships executable scripts

Files (30)

  • SKILL.md
  • SKILL.md · parts/challenge/
  • SKILL.md · parts/diagnosing-bugs/
  • hitl-loop.template.sh · parts/diagnosing-bugs/scripts/
  • SKILL.md · parts/human-review/
  • SKILL.md · parts/reflect/
  • cognitive_bias_canon.md · parts/reflect/references/
  • conversation_reflection_practice.md · parts/reflect/references/
  • honest_output_discipline.md · parts/reflect/references/
  • bias_pattern_detector.py · parts/reflect/scripts/
  • conversation_depth_analyzer.py · parts/reflect/scripts/
  • directional_recommendation_validator.py · parts/reflect/scripts/
  • SKILL.md · parts/relevance-scan/
  • README.md · parts/roast/
  • SKILL.md · parts/roast/
  • example_roast_verdict.md · parts/roast/assets/
  • roast_brief_worksheet.md · parts/roast/assets/
  • adversarial_panel_canon.md · parts/roast/references/
  • cheapest_test_canon.md · parts/roast/references/
  • verdict_synthesis_method.md · parts/roast/references/
  • brief_builder.py · parts/roast/scripts/
  • cheapest_test_designer.py · parts/roast/scripts/
  • verdict_synthesizer.py · parts/roast/scripts/
  • SKILL.md · parts/self-learning/
  • SKILL.template.md · parts/self-learning/assets/
  • skill-authoring.md · parts/self-learning/references/
  • SKILL.md · parts/self-reflection/
  • SKILL.md · parts/think-like-human/
  • examples.md · parts/think-like-human/references/
  • SKILL.md · parts/verify/

SKILL.md (first lines)

# review — judgement router

> Home branch in Memora: `root/skill/review`.
>
> Boundary: client patches are out of scope — a retired patch set is not startup
> work, and patch history is read-only diagnosis when the owner asks for it.
> This router evaluates artifacts and claims; it does not revive client patches.
>
> Removed 2026-09-19 by owner order: rejudge, rejudge-diff, cross-eval
> (external LLM validation APIs). Answer 593 (2026-10-18) closed the last
> exception: there is no "second opinion per run" any more — every review is
> verified locally.

## Choosing a part

| Situation | Part |
|---|---|
| Technical code review / bug findings | Local code-review method below; matching `security` parts for security depth |
| Where the canonical truth on a question lives | `parts/relevance-scan/` |
| Pressure-test a product/business idea ("roast it") | `parts/roast/`; simulated perspectives are not independent evidence |
| Challenge an assumption or plan adversarially | `parts/challenge/` |
| Check work from a human user's perspective | `parts/think-like-human/`; `parts/human-review/` for interactive preview |
| Reflect on what went wrong / right after a task | `parts/self-reflection/`, `parts/reflect/` |
| Extract lessons into memory after outcomes | `parts/self-learning/` |
| Verify claimed work and delivery hygiene | `parts/verify/` |
| Debug a reported bug systematically | `parts/diagnosing-bugs/` |

Seven parts, all kept; load only the ones the task needs.

## Rules

- **Output shape: a compact prioritized list.** Each material finding gets
  `file:line`, the triggering scenario, the observed or source-traced cause, the
  impact and the suggested repair. No scores, no invented issues, no
  guaranteed-count quotas.
- **Local evidence only.** Tests, typecheck, targeted probes, reading the
  callers. No external reviewer API or proxy, no "confirm with another model".
  A suspicion stays a hypothesis until supported; severity follows actual
  consequences.
- **Forks go to `ask_questions`**: a material architecture or product change,
  conflicting requirements, a check that cannot run. Ordinary verified defects
  in scope are fixed and re-tested without a per-finding ceremony.
- **Lessons land in Memora** under `root/skill/review` as a node with `outcome`
  and a link to the incident — not in a flat log file.
- Review-only means findings, not automatic implementation. A clean bounded
  review does not certify the whole system.
- Read the method and the referenced executable source before relying on its
  tools; historical host paths and slash commands are not proof of capability.

## Related

`dev` (`verification-before-completion`, `systematic-debugging`), `challenge`,
`security`, `task-cycle`.

From youlianvr/oper-share, CC-BY-4.0.

More from youlianvr/oper-share

Signals

Stars
14
Forks
4
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 20, 2026 (9 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
CC-BY-4.0
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from youlianvr

Cite this page

review skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/youlianvr-review (last updated 2026-10-24)