Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

idea2product-p2-strategy-analysis

Analyze the approved idea as a strategy problem, starting with an existing-solutions scan so the user can use, buy, partner, retire, or deliberately build a…

Skill by yichi2077

IndexedMIT★ 3
Write a review

Chalk Labs

Need help deploying idea2product-p2-strategy-analysis?

Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.

Book a call

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/yichi2077-idea2product-p2-strategy-analysis

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Analyze the approved idea as a strategy problem, starting with an existing-solutions scan so the user can use, buy, partner, retire, or deliberately build a differentiated product before deeper strategy work. Use when the user explicitly asks for idea2product-P2-strategy-analysis, P2, phase 2, or this step of the idea-to-product pipeline.

Use cases: data, agent-building

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/idea2product-p2-strategy-analysis

What's inside

Skill name
idea2product-p2-strategy-analysis
Description
Analyze the approved idea as a strategy problem, starting with an existing-solutions scan so the user can use, buy, partner, retire, or deliberately build a differentiated product before deeper strategy work. Use when the user explicitly asks for idea2product-P2-strategy-analysis, P2, phase 2, or this step of the idea-to-product pipeline.
License
MIT
Instructions
148 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (2)

  • SKILL.md
  • openai.yaml · agents/

SKILL.md (first lines)

# idea2product-P2-strategy-analysis

Analyze the approved idea as a strategy problem. Start by checking whether an
existing product, service, open-source project, or substitute workflow already solves
the idea well enough that the user should use, buy, partner, or retire instead of
building. Only then continue into issue tree, hypothesis tree, market, competition,
trend, right to win, unit economics, strategic options, evidence quality, and unknowns.

## Required Workspace

Work from the target project root when possible. If `.pipeline/scripts/pipeline.py` is missing, initialize the workspace first by invoking `idea2product-p0-guided-flow`, then run P2.

## Run

From the workspace root, run:

```bash
python3 .pipeline/scripts/pipeline.py run P2
```

On Windows, use:

```powershell
python .pipeline/scripts/pipeline.py run P2
```


Then follow the printed recipe exactly. The recipe separates required skills, conditional skills, optional skills, external tools, non-skill process steps, outputs, and completion commands for this phase.

## Main Output

`docs/10-strategy/existing-solutions-scan.md`

`docs/10-strategy/strategy-research-note.md`

## Existing Solutions Scan

This scan is a required first step inside P2. Use it after P1 has produced a real
`docs/00-idea/idea-brief.md` and before committing to deeper strategy/product work.
The purpose is to protect the user from building something they should simply use,
buy, partner with, or learn from.

### Inputs

- `docs/00-idea/idea-brief.md`
- `.pipeline/state/assumption-register.yaml`
- `.pipeline/state/risk-register.yaml`

If the idea brief is missing, still scaffolded, or too thin to generate useful
queries, stop and ask the user to clarify the idea through P1. Do not invent a
product category.

### Search

Use web search from the agent runtime. Cover four competitor layers (the fix for
"competitor blindness" — do not only look at direct rivals):

- Layer 1 — direct competitors (do almost the same thing)
- Layer 2 — indirect competitors / substitute workflows (solve the same job differently)
- Layer 3 — potential acquirers / incumbents with an adjacent capability who could enter
- Layer 4 — adjacent movers (not in this space today, but a plausible next step away)

Include open-source projects and ready-to-use SaaS, apps, services, templates, and
no-code tools at every layer.

Generate queries from the idea brief's user, job-to-be-done, problem, core
capability, constraints, and target market. Do not rely on one generic query.

### Output

Write `docs/10-strategy/existing-solutions-scan.md` with this exact structure:

```md
# Existing Solutions Scan

## Source Idea
[summary of the idea from docs/00-idea/idea-brief.md]

## Search Timestamp
[ISO timestamp]

## Search Queries
- [query 1]
- [query 2]

## Candidate Solutions
| Name | URL | Layer (1-4) | Type | Ready to Use | Fit | Gaps | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

## Competitor Pain Mining
[Free qualitative research: from reviews (App Store / G2 / Reddit / forums), the top
recurring complaints about the leading alternatives. Cite sources.]
| Competitor | Top recurring pain | Source | Does our hypothesis address it? |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

## Steelman (strongest rival)
[The most persuasive case for why the strongest competitor WINS and we fail. Is our
differentiation an actual moat, or a feature they can copy in a quarter?]

## Classification
[perfect_match | good_enough | partial_match | reference_only | no_credible_solution_found | search_unavailable]

## Recommendation
[use_existing | buy | partner | build_differentiated | continue_research | retire_recommended]

## User Decision
[pending | use_existing | buy | partner | build_differentiated | continue_build | continue_research | retire]

## Rationale
[why the recommendation and user decision are reasonable, tied to the candidate evidence]
```

### User Decision

If the scan finds a `perfect_match` or `good_enough` solution, stop before deeper P2
work and tell the user:

- what existing solution appears usable now
- which parts of the idea it covers

From yichi2077/idea2product-agent-kit, MIT.

More from yichi2077/idea2product-agent-kit

Signals

Stars
3
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Jun 15, 2026 (4 months ago)
Last release
Jun 16, 2026 (4 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from yichi2077

Done for you

Rather not set it up yourself?

Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.

See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies

Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.

launches shipped
50+
launches shipped
media placements
500+
media placements
founders on every account
2
founders on every account

Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block

Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.

Get idea2product-p2-strategy-analysis running in your business

Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.

Goes to the Chalk Labs founders, not the newsletter. Privacy

Need help deploying idea2product-p2-strategy-analysis?

CallGet help
Cite this page

idea2product-p2-strategy-analysis skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/yichi2077-idea2product-p2-strategy-analysis (last updated 2026-10-24)