systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Skill by whd4
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/whd4-systematic-debugging
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: testing
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions: not checked yet.
What's inside
- Skill name
systematic-debugging- Description
- Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 315 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
Files (11)
- CREATION-LOG.md
- SKILL.md
- condition-based-waiting-example.ts
- condition-based-waiting.md
- defense-in-depth.md
- find-polluter.sh
- root-cause-tracing.md
- test-academic.md
- test-pressure-1.md
- test-pressure-2.md
- test-pressure-3.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Systematic Debugging
## Overview
Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Quick patches mask underlying issues.
**Core principle:** ALWAYS find root cause before attempting fixes. Symptom fixes are failure.
**Violating the letter of this process is violating the spirit of debugging.**
## The Iron Law
```
NO FIXES WITHOUT ROOT CAUSE INVESTIGATION FIRST
```
## 🚨 Emergency Checklist (Senior Engineer)
**Production/High-Severity Incident? Read this first.**
1. **Stop the Bleeding**: Can we rollback? Toggle a feature flag? Restart? (Mitigate *then* debug).
2. **Snapshot State**: Capture logs, heap dumps, db state *before* restarting/fixing.
3. **Communication**: Who needs to know? (Status page, stakeholders). Don't debug in a silo.
4. **Bisect**: If a deploy caused it, bisect commits immediately.
5. **Hypothesis Log**: Write down what you've checked. "I think it's DB" -> Checked DB -> "It's not DB". Prevent circular debugging.
---
If you haven't completed Phase 1, you cannot propose fixes.
## When to Use
Use for ANY technical issue:
- Test failures
- Bugs in production
- Unexpected behavior
- Performance problems
- Build failures
- Integration issues
**Use this ESPECIALLY when:**
- Under time pressure (emergencies make guessing tempting)
- "Just one quick fix" seems obvious
- You've already tried multiple fixes
- Previous fix didn't work
- You don't fully understand the issue
**Don't skip when:**
- Issue seems simple (simple bugs have root causes too)
- You're in a hurry (rushing guarantees rework)
- Manager wants it fixed NOW (systematic is faster than thrashing)
## The Four Phases
You MUST complete each phase before proceeding to the next.
### Phase 1: Root Cause Investigation
**BEFORE attempting ANY fix:**
1. **Read Error Messages Carefully**
- Don't skip past errors or warnings
- They often contain the exact solution
- Read stack traces completely
- Note line numbers, file paths, error codes
2. **Reproduce Consistently (Script It!)**
- **Senior Pattern:** Don't rely on "clicking around".
- Create a `repro.py`, `repro.sh`, or `repro.js` script.
- Script should: Setup state -> Trigger bug -> Assert failure.
- *Why?* Allows rapid iteration of fixes and proves the fix works definitively.
- If not reproducible locally → Iterate on logging in staging until you trap it.
3. **Check Recent Changes (Bisect)**
- **Senior Pattern:** `git bisect` is your best friend.
- If it worked yesterday and fails today, the answer IS in the diff.
- Don't guess which file; let the binary search find it.
- Check infrastructure-as-code diffs too, not just app code.
4. **Gather Evidence in Multi-Component Systems**
**WHEN system has multiple components (CI → build → signing, API → service → database):**
**BEFORE proposing fixes, add diagnostic instrumentation:**
```
For EACH component boundary:
- Log what data enters component
- Log what data exits component
- Verify environment/config propagation
- Check state at each layer
Run once to gather evidence showing WHERE it breaks
THEN analyze evidence to identify failing component
THEN investigate that specific component
```
**Example (multi-layer system):**
```bash
# Layer 1: Workflow
echo "=== Secrets available in workflow: ==="
echo "IDENTITY: ${IDENTITY:+SET}${IDENTITY:-UNSET}"
# Layer 2: Build script
echo "=== Env vars in build script: ==="
env | grep IDENTITY || echo "IDENTITY not in environment"
# Layer 3: Signing script
echo "=== Keychain state: ==="
security list-keychains
security find-identity -v
# Layer 4: Actual signing
codesign --sign "$IDENTITY" --verbose=4 "$APP"
```From whd4/expert-ai-skills, MIT.
More from whd4/expert-ai-skills
- 0.529score
monte-carlo-predictor
whd4
Monte Carlo prediction framework for evaluating any project, with a real simulation engine.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
plan-writing
whd4
Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
prediction-toolkit
whd4
Route prediction and forecasting problems to the right method.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Sep 11, 2026 (1 month ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/whd4/expert-ai-skills
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from whd4
- 0.529score
monte-carlo-predictor
whd4
Monte Carlo prediction framework for evaluating any project, with a real simulation engine.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
plan-writing
whd4
Structured task planning with clear breakdowns, dependencies, and verification criteria.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
prediction-toolkit
whd4
Route prediction and forecasting problems to the right method.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
Cite this page
systematic-debugging skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/whd4-systematic-debugging (last updated 2026-10-24)