Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

evaluate-ddd

Evaluate DDD principle conformance across 3 layers and 12 criteria.

Skill by wfukatsu

IndexedMIT★ 13
Write a review

Chalk Labs

Need help deploying evaluate-ddd?

Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.

Book a call

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/wfukatsu-evaluate-ddd

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Evaluate DDD principle conformance across 3 layers and 12 criteria. Requires analyze output as a prerequisite. Can run in parallel with evaluate-mmi.

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/evaluate-ddd

What's inside

Skill name
evaluate-ddd
Description
Evaluate DDD principle conformance across 3 layers and 12 criteria. Requires analyze output as a prerequisite. Can run in parallel with evaluate-mmi.
License
MIT
Instructions
339 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Agent Skills spec issues

  • name: missing

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# DDD Evaluation

Shared files: a path written `@rules/…`, `@skills/…`, `@templates/…` or `@docs/…` is relative to the
plugin root, `${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` — not to the project being worked on. Read it from there.

**Usage:** `/architect:evaluate-ddd [target_path]`

## Desired Outcome

Quantitatively evaluate the target system's conformance to DDD principles across 3 layers and 12 criteria.

## Decision Criteria

For detailed scoring criteria, refer to:
@rules/evaluation-frameworks.md

- Strategic Design (30%): Ubiquitous language, bounded contexts, subdomain classification
- Tactical Design (45%): Value objects, entities, aggregates, repositories, domain services, domain events
- Architecture (25%): Layering, dependency direction, ports & adapters

## Prerequisites

| File | Required/Recommended | Source |
|------|---------------------|--------|
| reports/01_analysis/ | Required | /architect:analyze |

## Execution

### Step 1: Collect Input File Paths

Glob for all analysis documents: `reports/01_analysis/**/*.md`

Record the full list of found file paths — these will be passed to all sub-agents.

### Step 2: Spawn Three Parallel Layer Evaluators

In a **single message**, issue all three Agent() calls simultaneously so they run in parallel.
Each evaluator assesses its specific DDD layer independently.

**Task A — Strategic Design Layer (criteria 1-3)**
```
Agent(
  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
  model: "sonnet",
  description: "DDD strategic design layer evaluation",
  prompt: """
You are a DDD expert evaluating the STRATEGIC DESIGN layer (30% of total DDD score).

Read all analysis documents using the Read tool:
<FILE_LIST>
[Insert the full list of file paths found in Step 1, one per line]
</FILE_LIST>

Evaluate these 3 Strategic Design criteria, each scored 1-5:
(5=Exemplary, 4=Good, 3=Acceptable, 2=Concerning, 1=Critical)

1. **Ubiquitous Language**: Is domain terminology consistent between business and code? Are the same concepts named the same way everywhere?
2. **Bounded Context**: Are context boundaries clear with explicit responsibility separation? Is context mapping documented?
3. **Subdomain Classification**: Are Core/Supporting/Generic subdomains identified? Is investment level aligned with subdomain importance?

Return ONLY this JSON (no markdown fences, no explanation):
{
  "layer": "Strategic Design",
  "weight": 0.30,
  "criteria": [
    {
      "id": 1,
      "name": "Ubiquitous Language",
      "score": <integer 1-5>,
      "rationale": "<1-2 sentence explanation>",
      "findings": ["<specific issue or positive observation>"]
    },
    {
      "id": 2,
      "name": "Bounded Context",
      "score": <integer 1-5>,
      "rationale": "<1-2 sentence explanation>",
      "findings": ["<specific issue or positive observation>"]
    },
    {
      "id": 3,
      "name": "Subdomain Classification",
      "score": <integer 1-5>,
      "rationale": "<1-2 sentence explanation>",
      "findings": ["<specific issue or positive observation>"]
    }
  ],
  "layer_avg": <average of 3 scores, 1 decimal>,
  "layer_weighted_contribution": <layer_avg × 0.30, 2 decimals>
}
"""
)
```

**Task B — Tactical Design Layer (criteria 4-9)**
```
Agent(
  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
  model: "sonnet",
  description: "DDD tactical design layer evaluation",
  prompt: """
You are a DDD expert evaluating the TACTICAL DESIGN layer (45% of total DDD score).

Read all analysis documents using the Read tool:
<FILE_LIST>
[Insert the full list of file paths found in Step 1, one per line]
</FILE_LIST>

Evaluate these 6 Tactical Design criteria, each scored 1-5:
(5=Exemplary, 4=Good, 3=Acceptable, 2=Concerning, 1=Critical)

4. **Value Objects**: Are value objects immutable? Do they encapsulate domain rules? Are equality semantics value-based?
5. **Entities**: Do entities have stable identifiers? Is lifecycle management explicit?
6. **Aggregates**: Are transaction boundaries defined by aggregate roots? Are consistency invariants enforced within aggregates?
7. **Repositories**: Do repositories abstract persistence? Do they use collection semantics (not query-builder exposure)?
8. **Domain Services**: Are stateless cross-aggregate operations placed in domain services? Are they distinct from application services?
9. **Domain Events**: Are state changes published as domain events? Is event-driven design used for cross-context communication?

Return ONLY this JSON (no markdown fences, no explanation):

From wfukatsu/nexus-architect, MIT.

More from wfukatsu/nexus-architect

Signals

Stars
13
Forks
1
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 8, 2026 (23 days ago)
Last release
Oct 9, 2026 (22 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from wfukatsu

Done for you

Rather not set it up yourself?

Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.

See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies

Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.

launches shipped
50+
launches shipped
media placements
500+
media placements
founders on every account
2
founders on every account

Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block

Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.

Get evaluate-ddd running in your business

Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.

Goes to the Chalk Labs founders, not the newsletter. Privacy

Need help deploying evaluate-ddd?

CallGet help
Cite this page

evaluate-ddd skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/wfukatsu-evaluate-ddd (last updated 2026-10-24)