maintain-outcome
Maintain a measurable application or engineering outcome through repeated observation, prioritized fixes, and post-delivery verification.
Skill by William Cygan
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/wcygan-maintain-outcome
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/maintain-outcome
What's inside
- Skill name
maintain-outcome- Description
- Maintain a measurable application or engineering outcome through repeated observation, prioritized fixes, and post-delivery verification. Use for ongoing reliability, performance budgets, or recurring operational improvement with a defined objective.
- License
- MIT
- Metadata
- kind: component · author: William Cygan · maintenance: local
- Instructions
- 44 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Maintain an outcome Run a bounded improvement cycle against a measurable objective, preserving durable state between cycles. Use an existing operating contract; when it is missing or stale, use an available prepare-agent-objective skill or establish the same inputs, verification, authority, budget, and trigger before dependent actions. 1. Read the objective, latest checkpoint, active owners, remaining budget, and exact deployed versions. Reconcile pending work with live artifacts before acting. Record signal identities and change identities so retries do not create duplicate fixes, PRs, or deployments. Permit one owner per shared mutation. 2. Check observation health, freshness, coverage, and exposure before judging the outcome. Missing telemetry is inconclusive. For crashes, relate events to sessions or users by release and platform; zero events with no traffic proves nothing. 3. Group repeated signals, rank by user impact, and select a bounded unit. Track observed, investigating, reproduced, locally verified, delivered, and operationally confirmed states separately. Keep unsupported hypotheses and blocked cases visible. 4. Investigate the cause and capture failure or baseline evidence. Use applicable investigation, bug-fix, or experiment workflows when available. Make the smallest effective change, or test a structural alternative when repeated local fixes fail. Stay within the objective's scope, invariants, and resource budget. 5. Verify against the real affected surface, including relevant failure paths. Inspect outputs and side effects directly. Preserve evidence and unchanged acceptance criteria. Submit, merge, deploy, or roll back only as authorized by the contract; otherwise prepare the result and record the action needed from its owner. 6. After delivery, evaluate the outcome over the contract's observation window and minimum exposure. Check collateral metrics and affected cohorts. A local test or successful deployment is not operational confirmation. Low exposure, missing platform coverage, and delayed signals remain pending evidence. 7. On regressions, follow the authorized rollback or escalation path. Stop blind retries after repeated failure; state the failed assumption and next discriminating check. At the cycle budget or a blocking prerequisite, checkpoint progress and report the exact next action. Preserve successful improvements and failed trials. 8. Record metric movement, versions, evidence, unresolved cases, remaining budget, and the next authorized trigger. Clean owned resources without deleting proof. Check that a configured trigger is active before claiming continued monitoring. Without one, finish this cycle and state that another invocation is required. Report outcome movement and uncertainty, not just completed tasks. A sustained objective remains ongoing after a successful cycle; claim health only for the observed scope and interval. Escalate exhausted budgets, broken observation, and missing authority without silently widening scope or promising perpetual success.
From wcygan/agent-skills, MIT.
More from wcygan/agent-skills
- 0.570score
compare-solutions
wcygan
Compare competing solutions and verify a coherent synthesis.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
coordinate-work
wcygan
Assign independent units, control shared writes, and reconcile results.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
create-verification-skill
wcygan
Create a project skill that launches, exercises, and verifies real application behavior.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.570score
maintain-verification-skill
wcygan
Check and repair a project verification skill against source and live behavior.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.569score
implement-change
wcygan
Implement a bounded feature or refactor in verifiable steps.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
explain-history
wcygan
Explain the evidence behind a design decision or past failure.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
design-loop
William Cygan
Design, style, or redesign websites and apps through investigation, layout, design-system creation, implementation, validation, and delivery.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
decision-log
wcygan
Keep an auditable record of consequential choices and evidence.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
deliver-change
wcygan
Present or publish a verified result within authorized scope.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
design-options
wcygan
Compare designs and sketch interfaces before implementation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
explain-code
wcygan
Explain subsystem behavior and ownership from evidence.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
improve-workflow
wcygan
Find evidence-backed improvements to an engineering process.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 14, 2026 (15 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/wcygan/agent-skills
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from William Cygan
- 0.567score
design-loop
William Cygan
Design, style, or redesign websites and apps through investigation, layout, design-system creation, implementation, validation, and delivery.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.565score
discover-ambitious-goals
William Cygan
Find valuable project outcomes and stretch goals from product and engineering evidence.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.529score
just
William Cygan
Design, inspect, debug, and maintain justfile command workflows.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
Cite this page
maintain-outcome skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/wcygan-maintain-outcome (last updated 2026-10-24)