Chalk Labs
Need help deploying codebase-design?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/tudeorangbiasa-codebase-design
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: design
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/codebase-design
What's inside
- Skill name
codebase-design- Description
- Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules. Use when the user wants to design or improve a module's interface, find deepening opportunities, decide where a seam goes, make code more testable or AI-navigable, or when another skill needs the deep-module vocabulary.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 111 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (5)
- CREDITS.md
- DEEPENING.md
- DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md
- SKILL.md
- openai.yaml · agents/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Codebase Design
Design **deep modules**: a lot of behaviour behind a small interface, placed at a clean seam, testable through that interface. Use this language and these principles wherever code is being designed or restructured. The aim is leverage for callers, locality for maintainers, and testability for everyone.
## Glossary
Use these terms exactly: don't substitute "component," "service," "API," or "boundary." Consistent language is the whole point.
**Module**: anything with an interface and an implementation. Deliberately scale-agnostic: a function, class, package, or tier-spanning slice. _Avoid_: unit, component, service.
**Interface**: everything a caller must know to use the module correctly: the type signature, but also invariants, ordering constraints, error modes, required configuration, and performance characteristics. _Avoid_: API, signature (too narrow, they refer only to the type-level surface).
**Implementation**: what's inside a module, its body of code. Distinct from **Adapter**: a thing can be a small adapter with a large implementation (a Postgres repo) or a large adapter with a small implementation (an in-memory fake). Reach for "adapter" when the seam is the topic; "implementation" otherwise.
**Depth**: leverage at the interface. The amount of behaviour a caller (or test) can exercise per unit of interface they have to learn. A module is **deep** when a large amount of behaviour sits behind a small interface, **shallow** when the interface is nearly as complex as the implementation.
**Seam** _(Michael Feathers)_: a place where you can alter behaviour without editing in that place; the *location* at which a module's interface lives. Where to put the seam is its own design decision, distinct from what goes behind it. _Avoid_: boundary (overloaded with DDD's bounded context).
**Adapter**: a concrete thing that satisfies an interface at a seam. Describes *role* (what slot it fills), not substance (what's inside).
**Leverage**: what callers get from depth. More capability per unit of interface they learn. One implementation pays back across N call sites and M tests.
**Locality**: what maintainers get from depth. Change, bugs, knowledge, and verification concentrate in one place rather than spreading across callers. Fix once, fixed everywhere.
## Deep vs shallow
**Deep module** = small interface + lots of implementation:
```
┌─────────────────────┐
│ Small Interface │ ← Few methods, simple params
├─────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Deep Implementation│ ← Complex logic hidden
│ │
└─────────────────────┘
```
**Shallow module** = large interface + little implementation (avoid):
```
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ Large Interface │ ← Many methods, complex params
├─────────────────────────────────┤
│ Thin Implementation │ ← Just passes through
└─────────────────────────────────┘
```
When designing an interface, ask:
- Can I reduce the number of methods?
- Can I simplify the parameters?
- Can I hide more complexity inside?
## Principles
- **Depth is a property of the interface, not the implementation.** A deep module can be internally composed of small, mockable, swappable parts; they just aren't part of the interface. A module can have **internal seams** (private to its implementation, used by its own tests) as well as the **external seam** at its interface.
- **The deletion test.** Imagine deleting the module. If complexity vanishes, it was a pass-through. If complexity reappears across N callers, it was earning its keep.
- **The interface is the test surface.** Callers and tests cross the same seam. If you want to test *past* the interface, the module is probably the wrong shape.
- **One adapter means a hypothetical seam. Two adapters means a real one.** Don't introduce a seam unless something actually varies across it.
## Designing for testability
Good interfaces make testing natural:
1. **Accept dependencies, don't create them.**
```typescript
// Testable
function processOrder(order, paymentGateway) {}
// Hard to test
function processOrder(order) {
const gateway = new StripeGateway();
}
```
2. **Return results, don't produce side effects.**
```typescript
// Testable
function calculateDiscount(cart): Discount {}
// Hard to test
function applyDiscount(cart): void {
cart.total -= discount;
}
```
3. **Small surface area.** Fewer methods = fewer tests needed. Fewer params = simpler test setup.
## Relationships
- A **Module** has exactly one **Interface** (the surface it presents to callers and tests).
- **Depth** is a property of a **Module**, measured against its **Interface**.
- A **Seam** is where a **Module**'s **Interface** lives.
- An **Adapter** sits at a **Seam** and satisfies the **Interface**.
- **Depth** produces **Leverage** for callers and **Locality** for maintainers.
## Rejected framings
- **Depth as ratio of implementation-lines to interface-lines** (Ousterhout): rewards padding the implementation. We use depth-as-leverage instead.
- **"Interface" as the TypeScript `interface` keyword or a class's public methods**: too narrow: interface here includes every fact a caller must know.
- **"Boundary"**: overloaded with DDD's bounded context. Say **seam** or **interface**.
## Going deeper
- **Deepening a cluster given its dependencies**, see [DEEPENING.md](DEEPENING.md): dependency categories, seam discipline, and replace-don't-layer testing.
- **Exploring alternative interfaces**, see [DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md](DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md): spin up parallel sub-agents to design the interface several radically different ways, then compare on depth, locality, and seam placement.From TudeOrangBiasa/skills-for-agents, MIT.
More from TudeOrangBiasa/skills-for-agents
- 0.592score
diagnose
TudeOrangBiasa
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
show-me-your-work
TudeOrangBiasa
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long or unattended work: TSV log per decision, end audit, cross-model attention flags.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
setup-pre-commit
TudeOrangBiasa
Set up fast hooks with the repo's own toolchain (oxlint/oxfmt, Biome, or Prettier), type checking, tests, and a token-size gate.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
arena
TudeOrangBiasa
Parallel design bakeoff: N candidates on one brief, cross-judge, pick a base, graft the best parts.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
break
TudeOrangBiasa
Stress-test one component against worst-case content and states on a throwaway page, then report what visibly broke.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
correct
TudeOrangBiasa
Eliminate repeated agent mistakes at the highest level that works: architecture, types, lint, tests, docs last.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
architect
TudeOrangBiasa
Settle types, signatures, and module shape before code: ground, sketch twice, agree, implement, scrap when wrong.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
how
TudeOrangBiasa
Explain how a subsystem works: triage complexity, fan out explorers on 2 to 4 angles for complex scopes, synthesize into fixed sections.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
interrogate
TudeOrangBiasa
Adversarial multi-model review with rubric and bucketed verdict.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.579score
no-comments
TudeOrangBiasa
Kill needless comments plus the dead code they protect, fix root causes in scope, encode real constraints as structure.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.562score
prototype
TudeOrangBiasa
Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.562score
domain-modeling
TudeOrangBiasa
Build and sharpen a project's domain model.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 1
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 5, 2026 (25 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 23, 2026 (7 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from TudeOrangBiasa
- 0.592score
diagnose
TudeOrangBiasa
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
show-me-your-work
TudeOrangBiasa
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long or unattended work: TSV log per decision, end audit, cross-model attention flags.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
break
TudeOrangBiasa
Stress-test one component against worst-case content and states on a throwaway page, then report what visibly broke.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
setup-pre-commit
TudeOrangBiasa
Set up fast hooks with the repo's own toolchain (oxlint/oxfmt, Biome, or Prettier), type checking, tests, and a token-size gate.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
arena
TudeOrangBiasa
Parallel design bakeoff: N candidates on one brief, cross-judge, pick a base, graft the best parts.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
interrogate
TudeOrangBiasa
Adversarial multi-model review with rubric and bucketed verdict.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get codebase-design running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
codebase-design skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/tudeorangbiasa-codebase-design (last updated 2026-10-24)