writing-beats
Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.
Skill by tt-a1i
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/tt-a1i-writing-beats
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: writing
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions: not checked yet.
What's inside
- Skill name
writing-beats- Description
- Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 63 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- openai.yaml · agents/
SKILL.md (first lines)
<what-to-do>
The user has passed (or will pass) a markdown file of raw material. This is **exploit**: the exploring is done, the pile is fixed. Commit to a path through it and mine the pile to fill each beat.
If the user did not say where to save the article, ask once and remember the path.
Then run a beat-by-beat journey, choose-your-own-adventure style:
1. **Establish the prerequisites.** Before any beats, settle with the user what the audience already knows walking in: the concepts that are **grounded** from the start. Everything else must be grounded by a beat before a later beat can use it. See [Grounding](#grounding).
2. Write 2–3 candidate **starting beats**, drawn from the raw material. Each is a different entry point into the article. Each may only lean on grounded concepts; note what new concepts each one grounds. Show the user the beats before writing to the article file. The user picks one. Preview what beats that pick unlocks, as if the user is seeing a little way down the path.
3. Once the user picks a starting beat, write **only that beat** to the article file. A beat may be one sentence or several paragraphs, whatever that beat naturally is. Stop there.
4. Re-read the article file from disk. Then offer 2–3 candidate **next beats**: different directions the journey could pivot to from where the article now stands. Each must be reachable from the current grounded set; note what each one grounds.
5. Loop steps 3–5 until the article reaches a natural end.
</what-to-do>
<supporting-info>
## Grounding
Every **concept** has to be **grounded** before a beat can lean on it: the audience either walked in knowing it or met it in an earlier beat. A beat that reaches for an ungrounded concept loses the reader; that is the one move the journey can't make. The unit is the concept, not the word for it: a beat can lean on an idea the reader lacks even with no jargon in sight. Where a concept has a name (a **term**), grounding it means landing the idea and the term together.
A concept gets grounded one of two ways:
- **Prerequisite**: grounded before the first beat. The audience brings it. Fixed at the start.
- **Introduced**: a beat establishes it, and from then on it's grounded for every later beat.
So each beat does two jobs: it **requires** concepts that are already grounded, and it **grounds** new ones. Keep a running list of what's grounded so far, and update it each time a beat lands.
This is what shapes the choose-your-own-adventure. A candidate beat is only reachable if everything it requires is already grounded; picking a beat that grounds concept X unlocks every beat that was waiting on X. When you offer next beats, they must all be reachable from the current grounded set, and say what each one grounds, so the user can see which paths it opens.
The big lever is what you make a prerequisite versus what you ground inside the piece. Demand too much up front and you shut out readers who don't have it; ground too much inside and the early beats drown in definitions. Settle this with the user when you establish prerequisites, and revisit it whenever a tempting beat turns out to require a concept nothing has grounded yet: the fix is either a grounding beat before it, or promoting the concept to a prerequisite.
## What is a beat
A beat is one move in the journey. It does one thing: sets a scene, lands a point, asks a question, drops an aside, twists the angle. Then it stops, leaving the reader at a place where the next beat can pivot.
A beat is sized by what it needs:
- A single sentence if that's all the move is ("And then nothing happened for three weeks.").
- A short paragraph if the move needs setup.
- Multiple paragraphs if the beat is a self-contained vignette, argument, or example.
If a "beat" needs five paragraphs and three subheadings, it's not a beat; it's two beats glued together. Split it.
## Pulling from the pile
Pull material from the raw pile to populate each beat. You can paraphrase, split, recombine, or quote. The pile is a quarry.
## Ending the journey
The article ends when the journey is complete, not when the pile is empty. Most piles will have leftover fragments that don't make it in. That is fine; that is the point of having more raw material than you need.
## Writing rhythm
- Append one beat at a time. Never write ahead.
- Re-read the article file from disk before every write. Preserve user edits absolutely.
- If the user edits a previous beat substantially, let it change what comes next.
- If the user says "rewrite that beat" or "go back and try a different beat 3", do it: edit in place, leave the rest alone.
</supporting-info>From tt-a1i/matt-skills-with-to-goal, MIT.
More from tt-a1i/matt-skills-with-to-goal
- 0.699score
to-goal
tt-a1i
Turn approved planning evidence or partially completed work into a portable, verifiable execution goal.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.699score
execute-spec-in-fork
tt-a1i
Orchestrate approved, bounded work through a same-directory Codex App fork: create and name the execution task, ask it to run spec-executor, route decisions…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.699score
goal-crafter
tt-a1i
Craft verifiable, tight goal prompts for AI coding agents (Claude Code /goal, Codex Automations, Pi), either from a standalone task interview or from an…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.695score
spec-executor
tt-a1i
Execute approved, bounded work in an isolated implementation conversation and return a structured evidence receipt.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.695score
roundtable
tt-a1i
Convene a roundtable of sub-agents that debate a decision or proposal from opposing perspectives — parallel independent statements, anonymous cross-review…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.622score
grilling
tt-a1i
Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.619score
to-tickets
tt-a1i
Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published to the configured tracker…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.619score
improve-codebase-architecture
tt-a1i
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a report — HTML on request — then grill through whichever one you pick.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.619score
triage
tt-a1i
Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles, categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.619score
handoff
tt-a1i
Compact the current conversation into a portable handoff document, with an optional live clarification path for compatible Codex tasks.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.616score
ask-matt
tt-a1i
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
codebase-design
tt-a1i
Shared vocabulary for designing deep modules.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 187Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 187
- Forks
- 21
- Open issues
- 7
- Last commit (this folder)
- Aug 19, 2026 (2 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
- 0.878score
writing-beats
mattpocock
Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 302.4KClaude Code +9 - 0.366score
writing-beats
leandrocfe
Writing, exploit — assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 40Claude Code +9 - 0.359score
writing-beats
vasyapym
Writing, exploit — assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 20Claude Code +9 - 0.335score
writing-beats
brianrabil
Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.332score
writing-beats
christensenjo
Writing, exploit — assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.308score
writing-beats
maveeshah
Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.281score
writing-beats
aleksanderwalczuk
Writing, exploit — assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9
More from tt-a1i
- 0.837score
simplify-codebase
tt-a1i
Simplification audit or authorized codebase simplification whose stated objective is to remove accidental complexity.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 88.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.837score
archify
tt-a1i
Create validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, lifecycle/state, ERD, class, tree, timeline, and waterfall diagrams as explorable standalone…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 88.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.834score
archify-tuning
tt-a1i
Improve Archify diagram accuracy, visual quality and complete authoring speed with fewer repairs.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 88.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.823score
archify-review
tt-a1i
Review Archify issues, PRs, or code through value, cost, and impact to support evidence-based maintenance decisions.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 88.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.699score
execute-spec-in-fork
tt-a1i
Orchestrate approved, bounded work through a same-directory Codex App fork: create and name the execution task, ask it to run spec-executor, route decisions…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 187Claude Code +9 - 0.699score
goal-crafter
tt-a1i
Craft verifiable, tight goal prompts for AI coding agents (Claude Code /goal, Codex Automations, Pi), either from a standalone task interview or from an…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 187Claude Code +9
Cite this page
writing-beats skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/tt-a1i-writing-beats (last updated 2026-10-24)