thinking-first-principles
When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that…
Skill by tjboudreaux
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying thinking-first-principles?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/tjboudreaux-thinking-first-principles
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/thinking-first-principles
What's inside
- Skill name
thinking-first-principles- Description
- When a constraint is treated as fixed, separate physics from convention, keep only independently supported primitives, and rebuild the simplest solution that satisfies real constraints.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 47 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# First Principles
Strip assumed constraints to independently supported primitives, then rebuild. Escape analogy when convention fails or looks artificially expensive.
## When to Use
- A constraint is treated as fixed ("too expensive," "impossible," "always done this way") without independent support.
- Convention or analogy has failed, stalled, or only yields weak incremental variants.
- Greenfield design where industry defaults may smuggle false requirements.
- Cost or feasibility claims rest on pricing, precedent, or authority rather than physics, math, or measured need.
## When NOT to Use
- The constraint is verified physics, hard regulation, or measured capacity → accept it and optimize within it.
- A proven standard library, protocol, or known-good pattern already fits → use it; do not re-derive.
- Time-critical incidents → act on the most likely cause first; reserve first-principles rebuild for post-incident redesign.
- Incremental polish of a working system with no false-constraint signal → skip.
## Procedure
1. **State the problem and claimed constraints.** List every limit treated as fixed (cost, scale, stack, process, "must use X").
2. **Classify each constraint.** Tag as `physics/math`, `regulation/contract`, `measured fact`, or `convention/analogy/authority`. Keep only the first three as binding unless evidence upgrades a convention.
3. **Decompose to primitives.** Required inputs, conservation/complexity bounds, true non-negotiables. Demand independent support (measurement, derivation, primary requirement)—not vendor pricing or competitor precedent.
4. **Discard unsupported assumptions.** For each convention tag, state a falsifier. Drop or renegotiate anything lacking support.
5. **Rebuild from remaining primitives only.** Simplest solution that satisfies binding constraints and ignores artificial ones. Prefer commodity inputs and fewer moving parts over analogy.
6. **Validate and stop.** Check against real physics, contracts, and measured needs. Define the cheapest kill test. Stop when a coherent rebuild plus discriminating validation exists, or when only verified hard constraints remain.
## Output
Emit a first-principles rebuild:
- `claimed_constraints`: list with classification tags
- `primitives`: independently supported truths only
- `discarded_assumptions`: conventions dropped and why
- `rebuild`: solution derived only from primitives
- `binding_residuals`: real limits that remain
- `kill_test`: cheapest check that would falsify the rebuild
## Verification
- **Independence check:** every primitive must cite measurement, derivation, or primary requirement—not precedent alone.
- **No smuggled analogy:** if the rebuild still depends on "how others do it" without a primitive, strip it.
- **Constraint honesty:** verified physics/regulation must remain; do not wish them away.
- **Over-application guard:** if a standard solution is already optimal under verified constraints, do not rebuild for novelty.
- **Stop:** one decompose → classify → rebuild → kill-test pass; do not recurse without new evidence.From tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills, MIT.
More from tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
- 0.782score
thinking-lindy-effect
tjboudreaux
Use when longevity of a non-perishable option matters.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.782score
thinking-via-negativa
tjboudreaux
Use when the reflex is to add a feature, layer, or process.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.782score
thinking-kepner-tregoe
tjboudreaux
Use when a selective defect needs IS/IS-NOT difference analysis or a consequential option choice needs must/want weighting and adverse-consequence comparison.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.782score
thinking-probabilistic
tjboudreaux
Use when forecasting, estimating, or sizing risk — anchor on base rates, give ranges, update prior→likelihood→posterior on evidence, and factor unmeasured…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.782score
thinking-circle-of-competence
tjboudreaux
Use when a specific claim may lack grounding.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.782score
thinking-bounded-rationality
tjboudreaux
Use when search or investigation could run forever.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.778score
thinking-theory-of-constraints
tjboudreaux
When throughput or latency is pipeline-limited, identify the single binding constraint and exploit, subordinate, elevate, then recheck—ignore non-constraints.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.778score
thinking-systems
tjboudreaux
When behavior is emergent across components—fixes elsewhere break, loops/delays dominate—map boundary, stocks/flows, feedback, archetypes, then rank leverage.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.778score
thinking-ooda
tjboudreaux
Use under time pressure when the situation is still changing and you must act before certainty — cycle Observe→Orient→Decide→Act on ~70% confidence, then…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.778score
thinking-effectuation
tjboudreaux
Under genuine uncertainty with no reliable forecast, inventory means, cap downside at affordable loss, act for commitments, and let goals emerge from…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.778score
thinking-five-whys-plus
tjboudreaux
When a fault is localized and the proximate cause is known but the systemic root is not, chain evidence-linked whys with a counterfactual stop and a…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.778score
thinking-steel-manning
tjboudreaux
Before rejecting a proposal or reflexively agreeing, build the strongest faithful opposing case, state agreement conditions, then update or reaffirm.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 1,668
- Forks
- 185
- Open issues
- 2
- Last commit (this folder)
- Jul 17, 2026 (3 months ago)
- Last release
- Aug 4, 2026 (2 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from tjboudreaux
- 0.782score
thinking-circle-of-competence
tjboudreaux
Use when a specific claim may lack grounding.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.782score
thinking-lindy-effect
tjboudreaux
Use when longevity of a non-perishable option matters.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.782score
thinking-via-negativa
tjboudreaux
Use when the reflex is to add a feature, layer, or process.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.782score
thinking-bounded-rationality
tjboudreaux
Use when search or investigation could run forever.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.782score
thinking-kepner-tregoe
tjboudreaux
Use when a selective defect needs IS/IS-NOT difference analysis or a consequential option choice needs must/want weighting and adverse-consequence comparison.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.782score
thinking-probabilistic
tjboudreaux
Use when forecasting, estimating, or sizing risk — anchor on base rates, give ranges, update prior→likelihood→posterior on evidence, and factor unmeasured…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1.7KClaude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get thinking-first-principles running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
thinking-first-principles skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/tjboudreaux-thinking-first-principles (last updated 2026-10-24)