setup-verification
Give agents hands and eyes on a project: one way to launch, drive, and observe the real product, and acceptance tests that run fast and the same locally and…
Skill by taecontrol
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/taecontrol-setup-verification
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: testing, devops
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/setup-verification
What's inside
- Skill name
setup-verification- Description
- Give agents hands and eyes on a project: one way to launch, drive, and observe the real product, and acceptance tests that run fast and the same locally and in CI. Use when a project has no method that can prove a spec's examples, when acceptance tests are slow, flaky, or differ from CI, or when asked to set up end-to-end testing.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 21 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- openai.yaml · agents/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Setup verification An agent can only prove what it can run and see. Verification is a faithful, fast, repeatable way to exercise the real product, written down once so every agent uses it instead of rebuilding it. Make the mechanical parts deterministic, as scripts and commands in the repository; prose keeps only the judgment. ## Process 1. **Take inventory.** How the product launches, its interfaces, the existing test layers and tools, the CI configuration and platforms, suite durations, and flaky or skipped tests. Note where local runs differ from CI: platform, browser build, paths, ports, data. 2. **Choose how each interface is proven.** An API or CLI is driven directly. For a UI, prefer what the project already uses; otherwise, an agent-capable driver such as Manuvra, or an end-to-end framework whose steps state intent rather than selectors, so tests survive markup changes. A new tool or dependency is the human's decision: propose it with its cost. 3. **Make launch and control deterministic.** One command starts an isolated instance with known data and a health check, on ports and paths that cannot collide with another worktree, and cleans up after itself. 4. **Match CI.** Acceptance tests run in CI on the same runtime, browser, and platforms as locally. Where they cannot match, say how the difference is covered. 5. **Keep it fast.** Measure the suites; parallelize, share setup, and test below the UI what does not need the UI. A slow suite is a cost every delivery pays. 6. **Write it down.** Through `agents-md`, point the project's agent instructions to the verification scripts and when to use each, where acceptance tests live, how to drive and observe the UI, and what a ready pull request means for this project when it differs from `ship`. 7. **Prove it.** Run one real journey end to end locally, then in CI through `ship`, and show the result. ## Done An agent new to the project can launch, drive, and observe the real product and run its acceptance tests with the commands in its agent instructions, the same way CI does; one journey has run end to end in both places.
From taecontrol/skills, MIT.
More from taecontrol/skills
- 0.592score
strategic-programming
taecontrol
Apply strategic programming to non-trivial implementation and repair work when green tests alone cannot establish a maintainable design.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
architect
taecontrol
Settle a one-way door before code locks it: a change to persisted data or its schema, a contract that writes, a security boundary, an ownership model, or a…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
prototype
taecontrol
Make a design question tangible before committing to it: compare production-representative UI directions for a screen, component, or short flow, or drive a…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
refine
taecontrol
Review a working change with fresh eyes against its spec, then make it right and make it fast without changing the behavior its acceptance tests lock, in at…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
shape
taecontrol
Shape a problem with the human into one accepted spec: what to build, what success means, and how to prove it, before anyone writes production code.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
research
taecontrol
Investigate a bounded question against high-trust primary sources through parallel independent research, then produce a cross-checked Markdown report.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
spike
taecontrol
Run a bounded technical experiment when observation is needed to settle feasibility, integration, performance, or tool behavior.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
ship
taecontrol
Publish finished work as a pull request and drive its CI checks to green.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
deliver
taecontrol
Deliver an accepted spec autonomously, from failing acceptance tests to a pull request with green checks.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
diagnosing-bugs
taecontrol
Establish the mechanism behind a hard, intermittent, recurring, or performance failure from a faithful reproduction or distinguishing runtime evidence.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
garden
taecontrol
Tend a codebase between features: find drift in one area, group it by cause, and fix the causes worth their cost in one behavior-preserving pull request.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.584score
skill-guide
taecontrol
Explain available skills, compare their boundaries, or recommend what the user should invoke next.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 9, 2026 (19 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/taecontrol/skills
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from taecontrol
- 0.592score
strategic-programming
taecontrol
Apply strategic programming to non-trivial implementation and repair work when green tests alone cannot establish a maintainable design.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
prototype
taecontrol
Make a design question tangible before committing to it: compare production-representative UI directions for a screen, component, or short flow, or drive a…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.592score
architect
taecontrol
Settle a one-way door before code locks it: a change to persisted data or its schema, a contract that writes, a security boundary, an ownership model, or a…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.589score
refine
taecontrol
Review a working change with fresh eyes against its spec, then make it right and make it fast without changing the behavior its acceptance tests lock, in at…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
deliver
taecontrol
Deliver an accepted spec autonomously, from failing acceptance tests to a pull request with green checks.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.587score
garden
taecontrol
Tend a codebase between features: find drift in one area, group it by cause, and fix the causes worth their cost in one behavior-preserving pull request.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9
Cite this page
setup-verification skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/taecontrol-setup-verification (last updated 2026-10-24)