whats-next
Analyze current benchmark state and recommend what to work on next.
Skill by sourcegraph
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying whats-next?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/sourcegraph-whats-next
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/whats-next
What's inside
- Skill name
whats-next- Description
- Analyze current benchmark state and recommend what to work on next. Triggers on whats next, what should I do, next steps, prioritize work.
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Instructions
- 135 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# What's Next Analyze the current state of benchmark runs and recommend the highest-value next action. ## Steps ### 1. Get current status with gap analysis ```bash cd ~/CodeScaleBench && python3 scripts/aggregate_status.py --gap-analysis --format json ``` ### 2. Get config comparison ```bash cd ~/CodeScaleBench && python3 scripts/compare_configs.py --format json ``` ### 3. Categorize the situation and recommend Based on the data, present recommendations using ALL applicable scenarios below. Always check for gaps first. #### Priority 0: Missing runs (gap analysis) If `gap_analysis.total_missing > 0`, this is the **highest priority** — we can't analyze what doesn't exist. - Show total missing task runs vs expected - Group by config (SG_full gaps are most critical since those are rerun-dependent) - For each suite with gaps, show: suite name, config, count missing - Suggest the appropriate `*_3config.sh` script to run, or specific rerun commands - Note: SG_full gaps are likely from archived DS-compromised runs that need rerun with the DS retry preamble #### If runs are still in progress Report: - How many tasks are still running - How many have completed so far (pass/fail/error) - Suggest triaging any existing failures while waiting #### If there are failures, prioritize by impact **Priority 1: Infrastructure errors** (token refresh, API errors) These block everything. Fix first. - Show count and type - Provide the fix command (e.g., refresh token, reduce parallelism) - Suggest rerunning failed tasks after fix: ```bash python3 scripts/rerun_failed.py --filter token_refresh_403 ``` **Priority 2: All-fail tasks** (adapter/verifier bugs) These are broken everywhere — fixing helps all configs. - List the tasks and their error type - Suggest triaging each one: `/triage-failure <task>` **Priority 3: Divergent tasks** (some configs pass, some fail) These reveal MCP signal but are lower priority to fix. - List tasks where MCP helps (baseline fails, MCP passes) - List tasks where MCP hurts (baseline passes, MCP fails) - Suggest investigating the "MCP hurts" cases first (potential regressions) **Priority 4: Config-specific failures** - Note any patterns (e.g., "all SG_full failures are on K8s tasks") #### If paired reruns completed After paired_rerun batches finish (BL + SF on same VM), recommend analysis: - Run `/mcp-audit` to analyze MCP usage patterns and reward/time deltas - Run `/reextract-metrics` if any extraction bugs were recently fixed - Check zero-MCP rate — if >30% for a benchmark, MCP may not suit that task type #### If extraction bugs were fixed After changes to `extract_task_metrics.py` or `csb_metrics/extractors.py`: - Run `/reextract-metrics` to batch-update all task_metrics.json files - Then regenerate MANIFEST: `python3 scripts/generate_manifest.py` - Then re-run analysis skills (`/mcp-audit`, `/evaluate-traces`) with corrected data #### If all tasks are passing Great state. Recommend: - Run `/compare-configs` for divergence analysis - Run `/mcp-audit` for MCP-conditioned reward/time analysis - Start the next benchmark suite if any remain - Review the eval report with `/generate-report` #### If blocked on infrastructure Show exactly what's blocking and how to fix it: - Token refresh: provide the credential refresh steps - Rate limits: suggest reducing parallelism or waiting - Docker issues: suggest checking disk space and Docker status ### 4. Present as an actionable recommendation Format the output as: ``` ## Current State X tasks total: Y passing, Z failed, W errored, V running Gap: N missing task runs (of M expected) ## Recommended Actions (in priority order) 1. **[CRITICAL]** Run missing SG_full tasks (77 task runs needed) → SG_full has 0 valid runs for 10 suites after DS-compromised archival → Ensure DS retry preamble is deployed in claude_baseline_agent.py → Run: `./configs/locobench_3config.sh` (25 missing) → Run: `./configs/swebenchpro_3config.sh` (36 missing) → ... 2. **[HIGH]** Fix infrastructure errors (N tasks blocked) → ... 3. **[MEDIUM]** Fill baseline/SG_full gaps (N tasks) → SWE-bench Pro baseline: 12 missing (protonmail, internetarchive, etc.) → ... 4. **[LOW]** Investigate divergent tasks
From sourcegraph/CodeScaleBench, Apache-2.0.
More from sourcegraph/CodeScaleBench
- 0.499score
triage-failure
sourcegraph
Investigate a specific failed benchmark task — read logs, identify root cause, check if known pattern, suggest fix.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
cost-report
sourcegraph
Token and cost analysis per run, suite, and config.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
run-status
sourcegraph
Quick status check on the currently active benchmark run.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
sync-metadata
sourcegraph
Reconcile task metadata between selected_benchmark_tasks.json and task.toml files.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
validate-tasks
sourcegraph
Pre-flight validation of benchmark tasks before launching runs.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
check-infra
sourcegraph
Verify infrastructure readiness before launching benchmark runs — tokens, Docker, disk, credentials.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
compare-configs
sourcegraph
Compare benchmark results across agent configurations (baseline, SG_full).
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
archive-run
sourcegraph
Archive old completed benchmark runs to save disk space and speed up scans.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
quick-rerun
sourcegraph
Run a single benchmark task locally to verify a fix.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.495score
ir-analysis
sourcegraph
Compute information retrieval quality metrics (precision, recall, MRR, nDCG, MAP) comparing file retrieval across baseline and MCP configs against ground truth.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.495score
repo-health
sourcegraph
Run the repo health gate before commit or push to reduce doc drift and keep branches clean.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.495score
generate-report
sourcegraph
Generate the aggregate CSB evaluation report from completed Harbor runs.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 37
- Forks
- 5
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Mar 17, 2026 (7 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Repository
- github.com/sourcegraph/CodeScaleBench
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from sourcegraph
- 0.499score
archive-run
sourcegraph
Archive old completed benchmark runs to save disk space and speed up scans.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
quick-rerun
sourcegraph
Run a single benchmark task locally to verify a fix.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
check-infra
sourcegraph
Verify infrastructure readiness before launching benchmark runs — tokens, Docker, disk, credentials.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
compare-configs
sourcegraph
Compare benchmark results across agent configurations (baseline, SG_full).
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
cost-report
sourcegraph
Token and cost analysis per run, suite, and config.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9 - 0.499score
run-status
sourcegraph
Quick status check on the currently active benchmark run.
SkillDFreshness: D★ 37Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get whats-next running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
whats-next skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/sourcegraph-whats-next (last updated 2026-10-24)