Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

whats-next

Analyze current benchmark state and recommend what to work on next.

Skill by sourcegraph

IndexedApache-2.0★ 37
Write a review

Chalk Labs

Need help deploying whats-next?

Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.

Book a call

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/sourcegraph-whats-next

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Analyze current benchmark state and recommend what to work on next. Triggers on whats next, what should I do, next steps, prioritize work.

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/whats-next

What's inside

Skill name
whats-next
Description
Analyze current benchmark state and recommend what to work on next. Triggers on whats next, what should I do, next steps, prioritize work.
License
Apache-2.0
Instructions
135 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# What's Next

Analyze the current state of benchmark runs and recommend the highest-value next action.

## Steps

### 1. Get current status with gap analysis

```bash
cd ~/CodeScaleBench && python3 scripts/aggregate_status.py --gap-analysis --format json
```

### 2. Get config comparison

```bash
cd ~/CodeScaleBench && python3 scripts/compare_configs.py --format json
```

### 3. Categorize the situation and recommend

Based on the data, present recommendations using ALL applicable scenarios below. Always check for gaps first.

#### Priority 0: Missing runs (gap analysis)

If `gap_analysis.total_missing > 0`, this is the **highest priority** — we can't analyze what doesn't exist.

- Show total missing task runs vs expected
- Group by config (SG_full gaps are most critical since those are rerun-dependent)
- For each suite with gaps, show: suite name, config, count missing
- Suggest the appropriate `*_3config.sh` script to run, or specific rerun commands
- Note: SG_full gaps are likely from archived DS-compromised runs that need rerun with the DS retry preamble

#### If runs are still in progress

Report:
- How many tasks are still running
- How many have completed so far (pass/fail/error)
- Suggest triaging any existing failures while waiting

#### If there are failures, prioritize by impact

**Priority 1: Infrastructure errors** (token refresh, API errors)
These block everything. Fix first.
- Show count and type
- Provide the fix command (e.g., refresh token, reduce parallelism)
- Suggest rerunning failed tasks after fix:
  ```bash
  python3 scripts/rerun_failed.py --filter token_refresh_403
  ```

**Priority 2: All-fail tasks** (adapter/verifier bugs)
These are broken everywhere — fixing helps all configs.
- List the tasks and their error type
- Suggest triaging each one: `/triage-failure <task>`

**Priority 3: Divergent tasks** (some configs pass, some fail)
These reveal MCP signal but are lower priority to fix.
- List tasks where MCP helps (baseline fails, MCP passes)
- List tasks where MCP hurts (baseline passes, MCP fails)
- Suggest investigating the "MCP hurts" cases first (potential regressions)

**Priority 4: Config-specific failures**
- Note any patterns (e.g., "all SG_full failures are on K8s tasks")

#### If paired reruns completed

After paired_rerun batches finish (BL + SF on same VM), recommend analysis:
- Run `/mcp-audit` to analyze MCP usage patterns and reward/time deltas
- Run `/reextract-metrics` if any extraction bugs were recently fixed
- Check zero-MCP rate — if >30% for a benchmark, MCP may not suit that task type

#### If extraction bugs were fixed

After changes to `extract_task_metrics.py` or `csb_metrics/extractors.py`:
- Run `/reextract-metrics` to batch-update all task_metrics.json files
- Then regenerate MANIFEST: `python3 scripts/generate_manifest.py`
- Then re-run analysis skills (`/mcp-audit`, `/evaluate-traces`) with corrected data

#### If all tasks are passing

Great state. Recommend:
- Run `/compare-configs` for divergence analysis
- Run `/mcp-audit` for MCP-conditioned reward/time analysis
- Start the next benchmark suite if any remain
- Review the eval report with `/generate-report`

#### If blocked on infrastructure

Show exactly what's blocking and how to fix it:
- Token refresh: provide the credential refresh steps
- Rate limits: suggest reducing parallelism or waiting
- Docker issues: suggest checking disk space and Docker status

### 4. Present as an actionable recommendation

Format the output as:

```
## Current State
X tasks total: Y passing, Z failed, W errored, V running
Gap: N missing task runs (of M expected)

## Recommended Actions (in priority order)

1. **[CRITICAL]** Run missing SG_full tasks (77 task runs needed)
   → SG_full has 0 valid runs for 10 suites after DS-compromised archival
   → Ensure DS retry preamble is deployed in claude_baseline_agent.py
   → Run: `./configs/locobench_3config.sh` (25 missing)
   → Run: `./configs/swebenchpro_3config.sh` (36 missing)
   → ...

2. **[HIGH]** Fix infrastructure errors (N tasks blocked)
   → ...

3. **[MEDIUM]** Fill baseline/SG_full gaps (N tasks)
   → SWE-bench Pro baseline: 12 missing (protonmail, internetarchive, etc.)
   → ...

4. **[LOW]** Investigate divergent tasks

From sourcegraph/CodeScaleBench, Apache-2.0.

More from sourcegraph/CodeScaleBench

Signals

Stars
37
Forks
5
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Mar 17, 2026 (7 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
Apache-2.0
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from sourcegraph

Done for you

Rather not set it up yourself?

Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.

See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies

Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.

launches shipped
50+
launches shipped
media placements
500+
media placements
founders on every account
2
founders on every account

Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block

Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.

Get whats-next running in your business

Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.

Goes to the Chalk Labs founders, not the newsletter. Privacy

Need help deploying whats-next?

CallGet help
Cite this page

whats-next skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/sourcegraph-whats-next (last updated 2026-10-24)