Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

review

Independently review mathematical-modeling candidates, experiments, comparisons, or fusions from fixed selected material.

Skill by SoFarSoGoodya

IndexedMIT★ 2
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/sofarsogoodya-review

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Independently review mathematical-modeling candidates, experiments, comparisons, or fusions from fixed selected material.

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/review

What's inside

Skill name
review
Description
Independently review mathematical-modeling candidates, experiments, comparisons, or fusions from fixed selected material.
License
MIT
Instructions
9 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Review

Start in a fresh context with only fixed candidate/comparison/experiment material needed for the review. Do not inherit author chat history or an asserted recommendation.

Review mathematical validity separately from fair programmatic comparison. Mathematical review checks assumptions, derivations, units, identifiability, constraint handling, uncertainty, and conclusion scope. Programmatic comparison checks fixed data/splits, metric units and recomputation, baseline relevance, budget equality, leakage, coverage, failures, and denominators.

State evidence and unresolved issues precisely. A finite experiment is not an asymptotic proof; a successful process is not scientific validity; parent validity does not transfer to a fusion. Recommend a new bounded experiment or a human decision only when it could alter the conclusion.

From SoFarSoGoodya/mathmodel-weave, MIT.

Signals

Stars
2
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Sep 13, 2026 (1 month ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from SoFarSoGoodya

Cite this page

review skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/sofarsogoodya-review (last updated 2026-10-24)