autoresearch
Autonomous iterative experimentation loop for any programming task.
Skill by luiscantero
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/smolnar-autoresearch
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: testing, research, productivity
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions: not checked yet.
What's inside
- Skill name
autoresearch- Description
- Autonomous iterative experimentation loop for any programming task. Guides the user through defining goals, measurable metrics, and scope constraints, then runs an autonomous loop of code changes, testing, measuring, and keeping/discarding results. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. USE FOR: autonomous improvement, iterative optimization, experiment loop, auto research, performance tuning, automated experimentation, hill climbing, try things automatically, optimize code, run experiments, autonomous coding loop. DO NOT USE FOR: one-shot tasks, simple bug fixes, code review, or tasks without a measurable metric.
- License
- MIT
- Compatibility
- Requires git. The project must be a git repository. Requires terminal access to run commands.
- Metadata
- author: luiscantero · inspired-by: https://github.com/karpathy/autoresearch
- Instructions
- 266 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Autoresearch: Autonomous Iterative Experimentation An autonomous experimentation loop for any programming task. You define the goal and how to measure it; the agent iterates autonomously -- modifying code, running experiments, measuring results, and keeping or discarding changes -- until interrupted. This skill is inspired by [Karpathy's autoresearch](https://github.com/karpathy/autoresearch), generalized from ML training to **any programming task with a measurable outcome**. --- ## Agent Behavior Rules 1. **DO** guide the user through the Setup phase interactively before starting the loop. 2. **DO** establish a baseline measurement before making any changes. 3. **DO** commit every experiment attempt before running it (so it can be reverted cleanly). 4. **DO** keep a results log (TSV) tracking every experiment. 5. **DO** revert changes that do not improve the metric (git reset to last known good). 6. **DO** run autonomously once the loop starts -- never pause to ask "should I continue?". 7. **DO NOT** modify files the user marked as out-of-scope. 8. **DO NOT** skip the measurement step -- every experiment must be measured. 9. **DO NOT** keep changes that regress the metric unless the user explicitly allowed trade-offs. 10. **DO NOT** install new dependencies or make environment changes unless the user approved it. --- ## Phase 1: Setup (Interactive) Before any experimentation begins, work with the user to establish these parameters. Ask the user directly for each item. Do not assume or skip any. ### 1.1 Define the Goal Ask the user: > **What are you trying to improve or optimize?** > > Examples: execution time, memory usage, binary size, test pass rate, code coverage, > API response latency, throughput, error rate, benchmark score, build time, bundle size, > lines of code, cyclomatic complexity, etc. Record the user's answer as the **goal**. ### 1.2 Define the Metric Ask the user: > **How do we measure success? What exact command produces the metric?** > > I need: > 1. **The command** to run (e.g., `dotnet test`, `npm run benchmark`, `time ./build.sh`, `pytest --tb=short`) > 2. **How to extract the metric** from the output (e.g., a regex pattern, a specific line, a JSON field) > 3. **Direction**: Is lower better or higher better? > > Example: "Run `dotnet test --logger trx`, count passing tests. Higher is better." > Example: "Run `hyperfine './my-program'`, extract mean time. Lower is better." Record: - `METRIC_COMMAND`: the command to run - `METRIC_EXTRACTION`: how to extract the numeric metric from output - `METRIC_DIRECTION`: `lower_is_better` or `higher_is_better` ### 1.3 Define the Scope Ask the user: > **Which files or directories am I allowed to modify?** > > And which files are OFF LIMITS (read-only)? Record: - `IN_SCOPE_FILES`: files/dirs the agent may edit - `OUT_OF_SCOPE_FILES`: files/dirs that must not be modified ### 1.4 Define Constraints Ask the user: > **Are there any constraints I should respect?** > > Examples: > - Time budget per experiment (e.g., "each run should take < 2 minutes") > - No new dependencies > - Must keep all existing tests passing > - Must not change the public API > - Must maintain backward compatibility > - VRAM/memory limit > - Code complexity limits (prefer simpler solutions) Record as `CONSTRAINTS`. ### 1.5 Define the Experiment Budget (Optional) Ask the user: > **How many experiments should I run, or should I just keep going until you stop me?** > > You can say a number (e.g., "try 20 experiments") or "unlimited" (I'll run until you interrupt). Record as `MAX_EXPERIMENTS` (number or `unlimited`). ### 1.6 Simplicity Criterion Inform the user of the default simplicity policy: > **Simplicity policy (default):** All else being equal, simpler is better. A small improvement > that adds ugly complexity is not worth it. Removing code while maintaining or improving > the metric is a great outcome. I'll weigh the complexity cost against the improvement > magnitude. Does this policy work for you, or do you want to adjust it? Record any adjustments as `SIMPLICITY_POLICY`. ### 1.7 Confirm Setup Summarize all parameters back to the user in a clear table: | Parameter | Value | | ------------------ | ---------------------------- | | Goal | ... | | Metric command | ... | | Metric extraction | ... | | Direction | lower is better / higher ... |
From smolnar/agentfiles, MIT.
More from smolnar/agentfiles
- 0.405score
conventional-commit
smolnar
Use this skill when committing code changes.
SkillDFreshness: DClaude Code +9 - 0.405score
naming
smolnar
Skill for choosing variable names and identifiers.
SkillDFreshness: DClaude Code +9 - 0.402score
engineering
smolnar
Skill for applying engineering principles when writing or reviewing code, inspired by Russ Cox's worknotes.
SkillDFreshness: DClaude Code +9 - 0.399score
api-design
smolnar
Skill for designing APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC).
SkillDFreshness: DClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Mar 25, 2026 (7 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/smolnar/agentfiles
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
More from luiscantero
Cite this page
autoresearch skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/smolnar-autoresearch (last updated 2026-10-24)