Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

admin-access-register

Admin account register: system, main and backup admin, seats, plan, 2FA, shared logins and access-review dates, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request.

Skill by sickn33

IndexedMIT★ 48,428
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/sickn33-admin-access-register

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Admin account register: system, main and backup admin, seats, plan, 2FA, shared logins and access-review dates, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for access reviews.

Use cases: spreadsheets, backend, productivity

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/admin-access-register

What's inside

Skill name
admin-access-register
Description
Admin account register: system, main and backup admin, seats, plan, 2FA, shared logins and access-review dates, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for access reviews.
License
MIT
Instructions
357 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Admin Access Register

**What it is:** Who holds admin rights on each system, with a backup admin and review dates.

## Overview

Works out the smallest useful **Admin Access Register** setup for the business in front of it, then
builds it only when asked. The default output is a short recommendation, not a
spreadsheet. Artifacts - CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, Notion mapping - are produced on
request, from one field list so they cannot drift apart.

Layer: Layer 7: Protect. Fits: Growth stage. Table code: n/a.

## When to Use This Skill

- admin access register
- system access review
- privileged account list
- quarterly access review

Also use it when the user says "who holds admin rights on each system, with a backup admin and review dates", or describes the same process happening in a
spreadsheet, a document or someone inboxes.

Do not use it for: payroll calculation, tax filing, or legal advice. This skill produces
empty templates by default. A requested review may transiently use supplied data; minimize it rather than promising the host never processes it.

## How It Works

Follow the shared execution contract. The module-specific rules below define only domain fields, decisions, calculations, and safety constraints.

The upstream shared execution contract is not bundled; use this file directly. For an account-by-account register, derive a separate confirmed account identifier and grain instead of repeating the system aggregate counts on every account. Store a vault reference only, never passwords, tokens or recovery codes.

### Step 1 - Identify intent

Read the request and pick the intent before asking anything.

- "set up" or "build" or "create" -> the user wants artifacts; go to Step 2.
- "our process is ..." or "it is in a sheet" -> the user wants to move an existing process; capture it, then Step 2.
- "is this right" or "review" or "audit" -> the user wants a check, not a build; answer from what they share.
- "how do I ..." -> advice question; answer directly and offer the build only if it helps.

Ask only if this is the highest-value missing fact; otherwise proceed without an opener:

> **Q:** How many admin accounts exist?

### Step 2 - Ask only what is missing

Skip anything the user already answered, in any earlier message. Ask the rest one at a
time, and stop as soon as the remaining answers would not change the output.

- **Scope** - Which systems? / How many admins? / Vendor or employee admins?
- **Ownership** - Who approves access? / Named owner per account? / Any shared logins?
- **Review** - How often reviewed? / What happens on leaving? / Evidence kept?
- **Current process** - Is it recorded now? / IT ticket or nothing? / Is it current?
- **Outcome** - What do you need? / A register, a review cycle or both?

Never invent an answer. If the user does not know, record it as unknown and carry on.

### Step 3 - Hold the internal context

Hold the answers in this shape. It stays internal - it is not shown to the user unless
they ask, and it never carries a value the user did not give.

```yaml
module: admin-access-register
intent: null            # setup | advice | review | fix | build | convert | export
scale: null             # Starter | Growth | Scale, only if the answer changes it
areas:
  "Scope": null
  "Ownership": null
  "Review": null
  "Current process": null
  "Outcome": null
requested_outputs: []   # csv | sql | json | notion | xlsx - requested formats only
confirmed_facts: []     # only what the user actually said
open_questions: []      # the unanswered ones, in the order worth asking
```

### Step 4 - Recommend the smallest workflow

If an artifact was requested, build it after resolving essential missing facts. Otherwise give a short recommendation and offer the relevant artifact.

**Recommended approach:** Keep one row per system with named main and backup admins, aggregate admin count and review dates. Shared logins are the first thing to fix.

**Why this one:** Privileged accounts are the ones that matter after someone leaves. Naming an owner per account is what makes removal possible.

**Workflow:** System listed → Admin account → Owner and approver → Periodic review → Removal

### Step 5 - Build only on request

Once the user asks for it, derive the fields from the confirmed context and emit the
requested artifacts. For machine-readable text, keep prose outside the data; for files,
provide a usable link. Report material validation failures or limitations separately.

**A selected Notion output is rendered by `notion-manual-import`, so route the
Notion step there.** When the user selects Notion, hand that step to
@notion-manual-import: it holds the CSV, the property
mapping, the import steps and the verification checklist, and it renders the Field
Reference below instead of defining a table of its own. Do not restate the mapping
here and do not improvise the import steps. Manual CSV and mapping outputs need no
connection. For requested workspace changes, follow the shared contract: verify actual
tool access and the target before writing. A user saying "connected" is not tool evidence.
Never ask for a Notion password or token.

For an Excel-compatible CSV, use UTF-8 with a byte order mark so Excel opens the
text correctly. A CSV is not an `.xlsx` workbook; create `.xlsx` only when the user
requests a workbook.
A CSV carries no types, so after it, name the columns
that need a number, date or currency format applied.

```csv
System or Tool,Category,Main Admin,Backup Admin,Department,Access Level,Number of Admin Users,Billing Owner,Plan,Seats,Renewal Date,Company Owned Account,Shared Login,Password Manager Entry,Two Factor On,Last Access Review,Next Access Review,Offboarding Checklist Item,Risk Level,Status,Notes,Admin ID
Example Product,General,Example Admin,Example Backup Admin,Delivery,Full,3,Example Owner,Business,5,2026-01-15,TRUE,FALSE,Shared vault - Finance,TRUE,2026-01-15,2026-01-15,"Remove from payroll, revoke accounts, collect laptop",Low,Provisioned,Shared logins retired after the February access review; two orphaned accounts still need an owner.,
```

```sql
CREATE TABLE admin_access_register (
  system_or_tool VARCHAR(255),
  category VARCHAR(100),

From sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills, MIT.

More from sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Signals

Stars
48,428
Forks
7,039
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Oct 24, 2026 (6 days ago)
Last release
Oct 24, 2026 (6 days ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

Same skill elsewhere

Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.

More from sickn33

Cite this page

admin-access-register skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/sickn33-admin-access-register (last updated 2026-10-24)