arena
Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it.
Skill by shreshthkapai
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/shreshthkapai-arena
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: productivity
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/arena
What's inside
- Skill name
arena- Description
- Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 44 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Instructions read files in your home folder (~/.ssh, ~/.aws…)
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Arena Open a todolist with one entry per phase (Frame, Fan out, Cross-judge, Pick, Graft, Verify) before launching anything. ## Phase A: Frame Every candidate gets the same prompt, so the prompt is the contract. 1. State the artifact each candidate is producing. 2. Derive the rubric, 3-6 concrete gradeable criteria for what success looks like on *this* task. It is the picker's tool in Phase D. Candidates only see the task. 3. Pick the runners. Use the `arena_runners` role in `~/.config/agent-workflows/models.toml`, resolved with `aw-run --resolve arena_runners`, one runner per entry. An `inherit` entry in this role or the cross-judge role means the parent model. Families are providers, `claude` and `codex`. If the spawn or `aw-run` rejects a seat's model or its provider is unavailable, run that seat on its model's `fallback` and say so. Spawn more runners when the arena covers multiple design directions. Use the same model N times when the work is generation-bound rather than judgment-sensitive. Pick each subagent's reasoning level and fast or standard speed for the job, per the Subagents section of the **workflow** skill. 4. Give each candidate its own output location (a git worktree where possible, otherwise `/tmp/arena-<slug>/candidate-<n>/`), per the **separate-before-serializing-shared-state** principle skill. ## Phase B: Fan out Spawn all N subagents in one message, in the background, per the Subagents section of the **workflow** skill, each with the task, the path to the shared grounding, its own output path, and instructions to produce the artifact and a short rationale naming the alternatives it considered and what it rejected. If a candidate produces no output, proceed with N-1 and note the dropout. ## Phase C: Cross-judge After all Phase B candidates complete, choose one model from the `arena_cross_judge_pool` role, resolved with `aw-run --resolve arena_cross_judge_pool`. Prefer an entry whose provider differs from the current CLI's. Spawn one read-only judge subagent on that model (`aw-run arena_cross_judge_pool --index <n> --read-only` when it runs on the other provider). It sees the rubric and the candidates by path label, scores each criterion, and recommends a base with rationale. It runs in parallel with your reading in Phase D. Don't spawn it while candidates are still writing. ## Phase D: Pick a base Read every candidate end to end before picking. Score each against the rubric criterion by criterion, not on holistic feel, and compare with the cross-judge. Agreement on the base confirms the pick. Disagreement means one of you is biased or the rubric was ambiguous. Read both rationales before deciding. Pick the base a future maintainer can extend most easily without breaking invariants. When two feel tied, prefer the cleaner boundary or smaller API, per the Laziness Protocol. ## Phase E: Graft Walk each losing candidate once more for what is worth porting into the base, usually one or two things per candidate, not most of it. Fold each graft in by hand, per the **redesign-from-first-principles** principle skill, so the result stays coherent under one mental model. Don't paste mechanically. If the candidates converge on one shape, that is strong agreement. Note it and ship the consensus shape. No graft is needed. If they wildly diverge, Phase A was under-specified. Reframe and re-run rather than averaging the divergence. ## Phase F: Verify Verify the synthesized artifact like any other output, per the **prove-it-works** principle skill. If verification finds a problem the arena missed, either Phase A was wrong (re-frame and re-run) or a candidate caught it and you missed the graft (go back to Phase E). Don't paper over it. ## Outputs One synthesized artifact, with a short synthesis note alongside naming the base and why, the cross-judge's verdict, each graft with its source candidate, what was rejected and why, any convergence or dropouts, and the verification result.
From shreshthkapai/agent-workflows, MIT.
More from shreshthkapai/agent-workflows
- 0.553score
limits
shreshthkapai
Shows the live plan usage limits of Claude Code and Codex, and points to Grok's own view when Grok is installed.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
create-verification-skill
shreshthkapai
Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
architect
shreshthkapai
Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
interrogate
shreshthkapai
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart".
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
how
shreshthkapai
Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.536score
maintain-verification-skill
shreshthkapai
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.533score
no-comments
shreshthkapai
Spawn Comment Sicko, fix accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 14, 2026 (15 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/shreshthkapai/agent-workflows
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from shreshthkapai
- 0.553score
limits
shreshthkapai
Shows the live plan usage limits of Claude Code and Codex, and points to Grok's own view when Grok is installed.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
create-verification-skill
shreshthkapai
Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
architect
shreshthkapai
Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
interrogate
shreshthkapai
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart".
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
how
shreshthkapai
Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.536score
maintain-verification-skill
shreshthkapai
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Cite this page
arena skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/shreshthkapai-arena (last updated 2026-10-24)