Chalk Labs
Need help deploying post-dev-test?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/sd0xdev-post-dev-test
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: documents, testing, writing, agent-building
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/post-dev-test
Tools it pre-approves 5
From allowed-tools in SKILL.md: the agent may use these without asking you each time.
Read,Grep,Glob,Write,Bash
What's inside
- Skill name
post-dev-test- Description
- Post-development test completion. Use when: checking test coverage after feature-dev, writing missing integration/e2e tests. Not for: unit test generation (use codex-test-gen), test review (use test-review). Output: test files + coverage report.
- License
- MIT
- Allowed tools
- Read,, Grep,, Glob,, Write,, Bash
- Instructions
- 173 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Pre-approves any shell command
Files (2)
- SKILL.md
- test-patterns.md · references/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Post-Dev Test Skill
## Trigger
- Keywords: add tests, integration test, e2e test, test coverage, post dev test
## When to Use
- After completing feature development, before /precommit
- Want to ensure new features have sufficient integration/e2e coverage
- Unit tests exist, but higher-level tests are missing
## Key Rule: Must Execute on Changes
**Even if test coverage looks complete, tests must be executed whenever there are code changes.**
| Scenario | Action |
| ---------------------------- | ------------------------------------ |
| Code changes exist | Must execute related integration/e2e |
| Tests exist and are complete | Still execute to confirm no regression |
| Tests missing or insufficient| Write then execute |
| Pure doc/comment changes | Can skip |
**Reason**: Test coverage does not equal tests passing. Existing tests may fail due to code changes.
## When NOT to Use
- Only need unit tests (use `/codex-test-gen`)
- Review existing tests (use `/codex-test-review`)
- Still in development (complete `/feature-dev` flow first)
## Workflow
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 1: Analyze Context │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. From conversation history: what feature was developed? │
│ 2. Identify involved Service / Provider / Controller │
│ 3. List core flows and API endpoints │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 2: Check Existing Test Coverage │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Search test/integration/ for related tests │
│ 2. Search test/e2e/ for related tests │
│ 3. Assess coverage gaps │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 3: Determine Test Strategy │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ┌──────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Change Type │ Test Requirement │ │
│ ├──────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │
│ │ New API │ Integration test (Controller + Service) │ │
│ │ New Service │ Integration test (Service layer) │ │
│ │ Cross-svc │ E2E test (complete flow) │ │
│ │ DB operation │ Integration test (actual DB) │ │
│ │ External API │ Integration test (mock external) │ │
│ └──────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 4: Write Tests │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Reference existing test patterns │
│ 2. Use {FRAMEWORK_MOCK_LIB} createApp / createRequester │
│ 3. Follow TEST_ENV environment variable conventions │
│ 4. Write to corresponding directory │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 5: Execute Verification │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Execute newly added tests │
│ 2. Confirm passing │
│ 3. Report results │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Test File Conventions
| Type | Directory | Naming | Env Variable |
| ----------- | ------------------- | -------------------------------------- | ---------------------- |
| Integration | `test/integration/` | `*.integration.test.ts` or `*.test.ts` | `TEST_ENV=integration` |
| E2E | `test/e2e/` | `*.e2e.test.ts` or `*.test.ts` | `TEST_ENV=e2e` |
## Test Template
```typescript
import { Application, Framework } from '{FRAMEWORK_WEB}';
import { close, createApp } from '{FRAMEWORK_MOCK_LIB}';
import { ITestRequester, createRequester } from '../../createRequester';
import { TestEnvironment, onlyIf } from '../../helper/test-env';
const describeIntegration = onlyIf([
TestEnvironment.INTEGRATION,
TestEnvironment.E2E,
]);
describeIntegration('Feature Integration Tests', () => {
let app: Application;
let request: ITestRequester;
beforeAll(async () => {
app = await createApp<Framework>();
request = await createRequester(app);
});
afterAll(async () => {
await close(app);
});
describe('Scenario: ...', () => {
it('should ...', async () => {
// Arrange
// ActFrom sd0xdev/sd0x-harness, MIT.
More from sd0xdev/sd0x-harness
- 0.713score
debug
sd0xdev
Interactive debugging workflow with hypothesis-driven probe loop.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code - 0.713score
contract-decode
sd0xdev
EVM contract error and calldata decoder.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code - 0.713score
codex-brainstorm
sd0xdev
Adversarial brainstorming via Claude+Codex debate.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
best-practices
sd0xdev
Industry best practices conformance audit with mandatory adversarial debate.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code - 0.713score
codex-cli-review
sd0xdev
Code review via Codex CLI with full disk access.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
codex-explain
sd0xdev
Explain complex code via Codex exec.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
ask
sd0xdev
Context-aware Q&A with auto context gathering.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
claude-health
sd0xdev
Claude Code config health check + plugin sync.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
code-explore
sd0xdev
Pure Claude code investigation.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
code-investigate
sd0xdev
Dual-perspective code investigation.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
codex-architect
sd0xdev
Codex architecture consulting.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
deep-explore
sd0xdev
Multi-wave parallel code exploration orchestrator.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 194
- Forks
- 26
- Open issues
- 5
- Last commit (this folder)
- Mar 5, 2026 (7 months ago)
- Last release
- Oct 6, 2026 (24 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from sd0xdev
- 0.713score
code-investigate
sd0xdev
Dual-perspective code investigation.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
code-explore
sd0xdev
Pure Claude code investigation.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
ask
sd0xdev
Context-aware Q&A with auto context gathering.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
best-practices
sd0xdev
Industry best practices conformance audit with mandatory adversarial debate.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code - 0.713score
claude-health
sd0xdev
Claude Code config health check + plugin sync.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
codex-architect
sd0xdev
Codex architecture consulting.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get post-dev-test running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
post-dev-test skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/sd0xdev-post-dev-test (last updated 2026-10-24)