Chalk Labs
Need help deploying codex-code-review?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/sd0xdev-codex-code-review
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: documents, security, agent-building
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/codex-code-review
Tools it pre-approves 11
From allowed-tools in SKILL.md: the agent may use these without asking you each time.
Bash(git:*),Bash(yarn:*),Bash(npm:*),Bash(bash:*),Bash(node:*),Read,Grep,Glob,Task,Write,Monitor
What's inside
- Skill name
codex-code-review- Description
- Code review using Codex exec. Use when: PR review, code audit, second opinion on changes. Not for: doc review (use doc-review), security audit (use security-review). Output: severity-grouped findings + merge gate.
- License
- MIT
- Allowed tools
- Bash(git:*),, Bash(yarn:*),, Bash(npm:*),, Bash(bash:*),, Bash(node:*),, Read,, Grep,, Glob,, Task,, Write,, Monitor
- Instructions
- 464 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Pre-approves some shell commands
Agent Skills spec issues
- files: referenced but missing: scripts/lib/review-dispatch.js
Files (12)
- SKILL.md
- codex-invocation-contract.md · references/
- codex-prompt-branch.md · references/
- codex-prompt-fast.md · references/
- codex-prompt-full.md · references/
- codex-research-instructions.md · references/
- codex-transport.md · references/
- loop-diagnostics.md · references/
- review-common.md · references/
- scope-contract.md · references/
- review_rubric.md
- review_output.md · templates/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Codex Code Review
<!-- Security note: Bash(bash:*) is broader than ideal; cannot scope to specific
script paths until Claude Code #9354 resolves ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} in
command frontmatter. Only invoke bash for project scripts (scripts/*). -->
## Trigger
- Keywords: review, PR, code review, second opinion, audit, check
## When NOT to Use
- Document review (use `doc-review`)
- Security-specific review (use `security-review`)
- Test coverage review (use `test-review`)
- Just want to understand code (use `code-explore`)
## Variants
| Variant | Command | Scope | Pre-checks |
|---------|---------|-------|------------|
| Fast | `/codex-review-fast` | Diff only | None |
| Full | `/codex-review` | Diff + local checks | lint:fix + build |
| Branch | `/codex-review-branch` | Full branch | None |
## Shared Workflow
```
Resolve adapter → [Pre-checks if Full] → Collect changes & freeze baseline → Codex Review → Gate: derive sentinel × gate_reason (Step 4.5)
→ Ready × NONE → next gate | Blocked × IN_SCOPE_BLOCKING × untriggered → fix loop | other Blocked outcomes → E1/E2
```
Dual dispatch adds a second reviewer, and is opt-in:
```
--dual: … → Codex + Task in parallel → Merge findings in conversation (field-level)
→ Gate: derive sentinel × gate_reason (Step 4.5)
→ Ready × NONE → next gate | Blocked × IN_SCOPE_BLOCKING × untriggered → fix loop | other Blocked outcomes → E1/E2
```
### Step 0: Reviewer Mode
**Default: Codex alone.** Do not launch a secondary reviewer. One reviewer, one verdict, noted in Step 4.5 — there is no mode field, no aggregate plane and no state machine behind this choice: which reviewers ran is a fact of the conversation, not of a store (hook-lightweighting § 3.3).
**`--dual` (Branch variant only):** adds a second reviewer **in parallel**; on the Codex-healthy path the merge is yours to perform in conversation (Step 4). A second opinion for releases, security-sensitive changes and public API surfaces — nothing persists it, nothing blocks on it, and the next invocation starts single again unless the flag is passed again. When Codex is out, there is no merge: the validated fallback report carries the gate alone (Step 3.5 Codex-failure path).
| Variant | `--dual` accepted? |
|---------|--------------------|
| Fast (`/codex-review-fast`) | No — single only |
| Full (`/codex-review`) | No — single only |
| Branch (`/codex-review-branch`) | Yes, off unless passed |
See `@rules/auto-loop.md § Review Dispatch` for why single is the default.
### Step 0.5: Resolve the adapter locator (before any snapshot)
Resolve the adapter through `references/codex-transport.md` § Locator **now**, and let any
auto-install that section prescribes happen here — before Step 1 freezes anything.
The ordering is the transport contract's, not a preference: in a consuming repository whose first
review predates the installed adapter, § Locator's second step *writes* it into the tree. Resolve it
at dispatch time instead and that write lands after Step 1 froze the changed-file set and the scope
baseline, so the new untracked file is a tree change no baseline contains and no reviewer prompt
lists — a review whose own snapshot went stale while it ran.
A `setup-required` locator outcome (no adapter at any step) stops here and is surfaced to the
operator. It is **not** `codex_fail`: nothing was dispatched, so no fallback reviewer runs and no
verdict is noted.
### Step 0.7: Pre-checks (Full variant only)
```bash
{LINT_FIX_COMMAND}
{BUILD_COMMAND}
```
These placeholders are resolved from the host project's `CLAUDE.md` or `package.json` scripts. Record
results as `LOCAL_CHECKS`.
**It is numbered before Step 1 for the same reason Step 0.5 is.** `{LINT_FIX_COMMAND}` writes — a
project-wide lint fix edits files, and a build can regenerate them. Run it after Step 1 and those
edits land outside the frozen changed-file set and scope baseline: delivered changes every reviewer
dispatch then misses or misclassifies as out-of-scope. Settle the tree first — adapter, then
pre-checks — and freeze once, over the tree that will actually be reviewed. It was numbered Step 2
until 2026-09-04, which put it after the freeze.
If anything writes to the tree *after* Step 1 has run, Step 1 is redone in full. The baseline is
frozen once per review session, and a baseline computed over a tree that has since changed is not
the one this review is judging.
### Step 1: Collect Change Metadata
Collect **metadata only** — Codex reads the actual diffs and file contents itself via sandbox access.
`TASK_DESCRIPTION` is the original task in one or two sentences, captured here and **frozen for
the whole review session** — every first, fallback, and rotated dispatch carries the same value,
and it is never rewritten from review findings (`rules/codex-invocation.md`, full contract in
`skills/codex-code-review/references/codex-invocation-contract.md` — read it before the first dispatch; the three-part
dispatch shape).
`CHANGED_FILES` is the **frozen baseline set itself**, not a narrower query — the two are computed
from the same expression below, because a manifest that is a subset of the baseline hands the
reviewer a shorter change than the one it is told to judge. The change that added this paragraph
proves it: the transport adapter, its reference and their tests were all untracked, so
`git diff --name-only HEAD` alone omitted every one of them.
| Variant | Collection Method |
|---------|-------------------|
| Fast | `CHANGED_FILES`: `git diff --name-only HEAD` ∪ `git ls-files --others --exclude-standard` + `DIFF_STAT`: `git diff --stat HEAD`, plus a line count for each untracked file (`wc -l`), which no diff stat covers |
| Full | Same as Fast |
| Branch | Resolve `MERGE_BASE` **once**, per § Resolving the Branch base below, then use only that object id: `CHANGED_FILES`: `git diff --name-only $MERGE_BASE` ∪ the same uncommitted and untracked sets + `DIFF_STAT`: `git diff --stat $MERGE_BASE` + `CURRENT_BRANCH` + `BASE_BRANCH` + `COMMIT_COUNT` |
Codex reads the diffs and file contents itself, and **which command shows them depends on the
variant and on whether the file is tracked** — one blanket `git diff HEAD -- <file>` is wrong for two
of the three cases:
| What | How Codex reads it |
|------|--------------------|
| Fast / Full, tracked file | `git diff HEAD -- <file>` |From sd0xdev/sd0x-harness, MIT.
More from sd0xdev/sd0x-harness
- 0.713score
debug
sd0xdev
Interactive debugging workflow with hypothesis-driven probe loop.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code - 0.713score
contract-decode
sd0xdev
EVM contract error and calldata decoder.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code - 0.713score
codex-brainstorm
sd0xdev
Adversarial brainstorming via Claude+Codex debate.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
best-practices
sd0xdev
Industry best practices conformance audit with mandatory adversarial debate.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code - 0.713score
codex-cli-review
sd0xdev
Code review via Codex CLI with full disk access.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
codex-explain
sd0xdev
Explain complex code via Codex exec.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
ask
sd0xdev
Context-aware Q&A with auto context gathering.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
claude-health
sd0xdev
Claude Code config health check + plugin sync.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
code-explore
sd0xdev
Pure Claude code investigation.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
code-investigate
sd0xdev
Dual-perspective code investigation.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
codex-architect
sd0xdev
Codex architecture consulting.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
deep-explore
sd0xdev
Multi-wave parallel code exploration orchestrator.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 194
- Forks
- 26
- Open issues
- 5
- Last commit (this folder)
- Sep 26, 2026 (1 month ago)
- Last release
- Oct 6, 2026 (24 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/sd0xdev/sd0x-harness
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from sd0xdev
- 0.713score
code-investigate
sd0xdev
Dual-perspective code investigation.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
code-explore
sd0xdev
Pure Claude code investigation.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
ask
sd0xdev
Context-aware Q&A with auto context gathering.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
best-practices
sd0xdev
Industry best practices conformance audit with mandatory adversarial debate.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code - 0.713score
claude-health
sd0xdev
Claude Code config health check + plugin sync.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9 - 0.713score
codex-architect
sd0xdev
Codex architecture consulting.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 194Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get codex-code-review running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
codex-code-review skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/sd0xdev-codex-code-review (last updated 2026-10-24)