research-brief
Produce a decision-ready research-brief brief from bounded governed evidence and preserve every material source binding.
Skill by runxhq
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/runxhq-research-brief
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: research
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
- Runs as
- Node.js package
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/research-brief
What's inside
- Skill name
research-brief- Description
- Produce a decision-ready research-brief brief from bounded governed evidence and preserve every material source binding.
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Instructions
- 83 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
Files (11)
- SKILL.md
- ecosystem.mjs
- composes-in-graph.yaml · fixtures/
- ecosystem-composes-in-graph.yaml · fixtures/
- composed.graph · fixtures/support/
- ecosystem.graph · fixtures/support/
- mark.svg
- catalog.md · references/
- decision-brief.md · references/examples/
- mark-license.md · references/
- run.yaml
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Research Brief Turn one important question into a durable operator brief: what the answer is, what evidence supports it, what remains uncertain, and what posture the reader should take next. Use this when a quick answer is too shallow but an open-ended report would obscure the decision. The output should feel like a thoughtful memo, not a narration of the research process. It leads with the decision and operational implication, then exposes the evidence, inference, alternatives, and unresolved questions that justify that posture. ## Composes <!-- Generated from the native execution closure; run pnpm core-skills:composes:generate. --> - `ghostwrite#draft` - `research#local-files` - `research#research` ## When to use it Use `research-brief` for architecture choices, market or ecosystem questions, product bets, trust decisions, or other consequential analysis that needs a reader-ready synthesis. Use plain `research` when the evidence packet itself is the desired artifact. Use `content-package` when the primary outcome is public content for a known channel. Do not use this skill for an unbounded literature review, a daily trend recap, or research whose sources have not been fetched through a governed reader. ## How the chain works 1. The caller supplies the exact question and audience plus either governed source packets or bounded local paths. The `local-files` runner reads those paths through Runx's native filesystem boundary; it does not tunnel local evidence through HTTP. 2. The canonical `research` skill admits and indexes those sources, separates evidence from inference, and verifies every citation and recommendation. 3. Only a ready research packet proceeds to `ghostwrite`. The writing stage turns decision support into a clear brief without introducing unsupported facts. 4. The final artifact preserves the research and content packet bindings. It remains local and is not a publication claim. Local research and drafting need no approval because they do not cross an external boundary. If the brief is later sent, posted, or published, the provider delivery skill owns approval, idempotency, acknowledgement, and readback. ## Inputs and result - `objective` is the exact decision question. - `source_packets` are bounded governed evidence. The `local-files` runner accepts bounded paths below a selected local root instead. Operator context, URLs, bare paths, and model memory do not substitute for admitted evidence. - `audience` and `channel` shape the memo's presentation. - `domain`, `operator_context`, and `target_entities` keep the analysis scoped but do not count as evidence. The result contains the citation-validated `research_packet` and, when evidence is ready, the evidence-bound `content_draft_packet`. It may finish at `needs_more_evidence` or `not_worth_publishing` rather than manufacture a memo. ## Stop conditions - Stop before drafting when no valid source survives research admission. - Preserve uncertainty that could change the recommendation. - Do not turn operator preference into a verified market or product fact. - Do not add a publish or delivery state to a local brief. - Route any outward action to its owning provider skill with the exact artifact digest and evidence packet intact. ## Example For “Should this provider become a native Runx tool?”, the source set might include its official API contract, two existing consumer implementations, and runtime measurements. The brief should recommend native ownership, package ownership, or no change; show which evidence supports that boundary; and name the remaining operational risk. It should not become a generic provider profile or imply adoption merely because the API exists.
From runxhq/runx, Apache-2.0.
More from runxhq/runx
- 0.719score
code-plan
runxhq
Compile a bounded objective or code-intake change set into a dependency-safe Runx execution plan, with deterministic checks for evidence preservation…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.719score
policy-draft
runxhq
Draft or tighten a Runx operational policy from a governance brief, then validate the exact runx.operational_policy.v1 contract with the native policy engine.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.719score
redact-pii
runxhq
Detect and remove personal data before content crosses a trust boundary, returning usable scrubbed content only when a deterministic residual scan passes.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.719score
skill-review
runxhq
Inspect, safely test, and assess one Runx skill package for capability, trust, and operator readiness.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.719score
reddit
runxhq
Manage named Reddit accounts through their existing browser sessions, find useful conversations, draft in each account's voice, and submit one exactly…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.719score
prior-art
runxhq
Inspect bounded local repository and Runx catalog evidence before a design, draft, or operator decision, then produce citation-bound findings and a reuse…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.716score
cold-outreach
runxhq
Prepare one relevant, evidence-bound cold email for an exact prospect using scoped brand and taste context; hold unsafe or unsupported contact and leave…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.716score
conversation-review
runxhq
Review one grounded provider-neutral conversation, prepare an unsent reply or follow-up, and identify genuine coding requests for a separate engineering intake.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.716score
crm-update-plan
runxhq
Reconcile a call transcript against current CRM records and propose allowlisted field updates, each traced to a verbatim transcript quote, with the write left…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.716score
attention-review
runxhq
Decide which bounded personal observations warrant attention, then return a source-bound private briefing intent and next-check proposal.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.716score
contact-consent-review
runxhq
Decide and record conservative contact-consent transitions from bounded engagement, bounce, and consent evidence before any send.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.716score
content-package
runxhq
Turn governed source evidence into a citation-bound reader-facing draft, channel package, and provider-neutral publication handoff.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 104
- Forks
- 109
- Open issues
- 16
- Contributors
- 16
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 21, 2026 (8 days ago)
- Last release
- Oct 18, 2026 (11 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Repository
- github.com/runxhq/runx
- Website
- runx.ai
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from runxhq
- 0.719score
redact-pii
runxhq
Detect and remove personal data before content crosses a trust boundary, returning usable scrubbed content only when a deterministic residual scan passes.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.719score
reddit
runxhq
Manage named Reddit accounts through their existing browser sessions, find useful conversations, draft in each account's voice, and submit one exactly…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.719score
policy-draft
runxhq
Draft or tighten a Runx operational policy from a governance brief, then validate the exact runx.operational_policy.v1 contract with the native policy engine.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.719score
prior-art
runxhq
Inspect bounded local repository and Runx catalog evidence before a design, draft, or operator decision, then produce citation-bound findings and a reuse…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.719score
code-plan
runxhq
Compile a bounded objective or code-intake change set into a dependency-safe Runx execution plan, with deterministic checks for evidence preservation…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9 - 0.719score
skill-review
runxhq
Inspect, safely test, and assess one Runx skill package for capability, trust, and operator readiness.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 104Claude Code +9
Cite this page
research-brief skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/runxhq-research-brief (last updated 2026-10-24)