literature-review
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
Skill by ricfulop
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying literature-review?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/ricfulop-literature-review
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: documents, research
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions: not checked yet.
What's inside
- Skill name
literature-review- Description
- Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
- License
- MIT
- Allowed tools
- Read, Write, Edit, Bash
- Metadata
- version: 1.0 · skill-author: K-Dense Inc.
- Instructions
- 692 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
- Pre-approves any shell command
- Instructions call the network
Agent Skills spec issues
- body: 692 lines (spec recommends under 500)
Files (9)
- SKILL.md
- review_template.md · assets/
- citation_styles.md · references/
- database_strategies.md · references/
- generate_pdf.py · scripts/
- generate_schematic.py · scripts/
- generate_schematic_ai.py · scripts/
- search_databases.py · scripts/
- verify_citations.py · scripts/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Literature Review
## Overview
Conduct systematic, comprehensive literature reviews following rigorous academic methodology. Search multiple literature databases, synthesize findings thematically, verify all citations for accuracy, and generate professional output documents in markdown and PDF formats.
This skill uses the **parallel-web skill** (`parallel-cli search`) as the primary web search tool for broad academic literature discovery, supplemented by specialized database access skills (gget, bioservices, datacommons-client). It provides specialized tools for citation verification, result aggregation, and document generation.
## When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Conducting a systematic literature review for research or publication
- Synthesizing current knowledge on a specific topic across multiple sources
- Performing meta-analysis or scoping reviews
- Writing the literature review section of a research paper or thesis
- Investigating the state of the art in a research domain
- Identifying research gaps and future directions
- Requiring verified citations and professional formatting
## Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
**⚠️ MANDATORY: Every literature review MUST include at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.**
This is not optional. Literature reviews without visual elements are incomplete. Before finalizing any document:
1. Generate at minimum ONE schematic or diagram (e.g., PRISMA flow diagram for systematic reviews)
2. Prefer 2-3 figures for comprehensive reviews (search strategy flowchart, thematic synthesis diagram, conceptual framework)
**How to generate figures:**
- Use the **scientific-schematics** skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
**How to generate schematics:**
```bash
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
```
The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
**When to add schematics:**
- PRISMA flow diagrams for systematic reviews
- Literature search strategy flowcharts
- Thematic synthesis diagrams
- Research gap visualization maps
- Citation network diagrams
- Conceptual framework illustrations
- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization
For detailed guidance on creating schematics, refer to the scientific-schematics skill documentation.
---
## Core Workflow
Literature reviews follow a structured, multi-phase workflow:
### Phase 1: Planning and Scoping
1. **Define Research Question**: Use PICO framework (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) for clinical/biomedical reviews
- Example: "What is the efficacy of CRISPR-Cas9 (I) for treating sickle cell disease (P) compared to standard care (C)?"
2. **Establish Scope and Objectives**:
- Define clear, specific research questions
- Determine review type (narrative, systematic, scoping, meta-analysis)
- Set boundaries (time period, geographic scope, study types)
3. **Develop Search Strategy**:
- Identify 2-4 main concepts from research question
- List synonyms, abbreviations, and related terms for each concept
- Plan Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) to combine terms
- Select minimum 3 complementary databases
- **Use the parallel-web skill (`parallel-cli search`) for initial scoping** to quickly gauge the landscape before formal database searches
4. **Set Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria**:
- Date range (e.g., last 10 years: 2015-2024)
- Language (typically English, or specify multilingual)
- Publication types (peer-reviewed, preprints, reviews)
- Study designs (RCTs, observational, in vitro, etc.)
- Document all criteria clearly
### Phase 2: Systematic Literature Search
1. **Multi-Database Search**:
Select databases appropriate for the domain. **Always start with parallel-web for broad academic coverage**, then supplement with domain-specific databases.
**Web-Based Academic Search (parallel-web skill — START HERE):**
- Use `parallel-cli search` with academic domain filtering for broad scholarly coverage
- Run two searches: academic-focused + general to catch all relevant sources
```bash
# Academic-focused search across scholarly sources
parallel-cli search "your research topic" -q "keyword1" -q "keyword2" \
--json --max-results 10 --excerpt-max-chars-total 27000 \
--include-domains "scholar.google.com,arxiv.org,pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov,semanticscholar.org,biorxiv.org,medrxiv.org,ncbi.nlm.nih.gov,nature.com,science.org,ieee.org,acm.org,springer.com,wiley.com,cell.com,pnas.org,nih.gov" \
-o sources/litreview_<topic>-academic.json
# General search for supplementary sources
parallel-cli search "your research topic" -q "keyword1" -q "keyword2" \
--json --max-results 10 --excerpt-max-chars-total 27000 \
-o sources/litreview_<topic>-general.json
```
- Use `parallel-cli extract` to fetch full content from specific paper URLs or PDFs found in search results
```bash
parallel-cli extract "https://arxiv.org/abs/XXXX.XXXXX" --json
```
**Biomedical & Life Sciences:**
- Use `gget` skill: `gget search pubmed "search terms"` for PubMed/PMC
- Use `gget` skill: `gget search biorxiv "search terms"` for preprints
- Use `bioservices` skill for ChEMBL, KEGG, UniProt, etc.
**General Scientific Literature:**
- Search arXiv via direct API (preprints in physics, math, CS, q-bio)
- Search Semantic Scholar via API (200M+ papers, cross-disciplinary)
- Use Google Scholar for comprehensive coverage (manual or careful scraping)From ricfulop/cba-agentic-engineering-bootstrap, MIT.
More from ricfulop/cba-agentic-engineering-bootstrap
- 0.552score
paper-lookup
ricfulop
Search 10 academic paper databases via REST APIs for research papers, preprints, and scholarly articles.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.547score
dual-source-honesty
ricfulop
Keep fetch-time catalogs distinct from corrected bibliographies; keep measured, derived, and estimated values distinct.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.547score
domain-corpus-bootstrap
ricfulop
Become a domain expert in X by building a reproducible, legally-acquired literature corpus for a new project or topic — topic map, checked-in query manifest…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.547score
prereg-freeze
ricfulop
Hash-bound preregistration before confirmatory runs.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.546score
figure-style
ricfulop
Pointer to APS, Nature, and Science figure skills plus lib/styles.py.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.545score
mit-presentation
ricfulop
Build academic PowerPoint decks from the official MIT Arial template.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.542score
literature-corpus
ricfulop
Pointer to domain-corpus-bootstrap.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.540score
pymc
ricfulop
Bayesian modeling with PyMC.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.294score
aps-figure-style
ricfulop
No description from the publisher yet.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.294score
manuscript-prose-style
ricfulop
No description from the publisher yet.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.294score
nature-figure-style
ricfulop
No description from the publisher yet.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Sep 2, 2026 (2 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- Version
- 1.0
- License
- MIT
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
- 0.547score
literature-review
brycewang-stanford
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
SkillCFreshness: C★ 4.8KClaude Code +9 - 0.336score
literature-review
foryourhealth111-pixel
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3.8KClaude Code +9 - 0.308score
literature-review
qinyan-ai
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
SkillDFreshness: D★ 87Claude Code +9 - 0.282score
literature-review
go-bananas-wwj
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
SkillCFreshness: CClaude Code +9 - 0.279score
literature-review
brycewang-stanford
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
SkillCFreshness: C★ 4.8KClaude Code +9 - 0.275score
literature-review
Cesar514
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
SkillDFreshness: D★ 6Claude Code +9 - 0.263score
literature-review
lamm-mit
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
SkillCFreshness: C★ 250Claude Code +9 - 0.241score
literature-review
beita6969
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.).
SkillDFreshness: D★ 1KClaude Code +9
More from ricfulop
- 0.552score
paper-lookup
ricfulop
Search 10 academic paper databases via REST APIs for research papers, preprints, and scholarly articles.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.547score
dual-source-honesty
ricfulop
Keep fetch-time catalogs distinct from corrected bibliographies; keep measured, derived, and estimated values distinct.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.547score
prereg-freeze
ricfulop
Hash-bound preregistration before confirmatory runs.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.547score
domain-corpus-bootstrap
ricfulop
Become a domain expert in X by building a reproducible, legally-acquired literature corpus for a new project or topic — topic map, checked-in query manifest…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.546score
figure-style
ricfulop
Pointer to APS, Nature, and Science figure skills plus lib/styles.py.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.545score
mit-presentation
ricfulop
Build academic PowerPoint decks from the official MIT Arial template.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get literature-review running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
literature-review skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/ricfulop-literature-review (last updated 2026-10-24)