Chalk Labs
Need help deploying ux?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/rainmanjam-ux
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: presentations, design, frontend
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 26, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/ux
What's inside
- Skill name
ux- Description
- Forms, flows and screens. Structure, naming and clarity of user-facing interaction code: component boundaries, state ownership, and keeping presentation separable from the rules behind it.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 83 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# UX: Structuring Interaction Code Interface code accumulates faster than any other kind, because every requirement arrives as "and also, when the user does X". Without structure a screen becomes one component holding fetching, validation, formatting, submission and error display, and every change risks all of them. The discipline is ordinary: single responsibility, explicit state ownership, and names that survive being read alone. What is different is that the pressure to skip it is higher, because interface code is visible and the deadline is usually visual. ## Decide where state lives, once Most interface bugs are state-ownership bugs wearing other clothes. **One owner per piece of state.** If two components can both change a value, they will disagree, and the disagreement will be intermittent. Lift the state to the nearest common parent and pass it down, or move it out of the tree entirely. **Derive rather than duplicate.** A `total` stored alongside the `items` it sums is two facts that must agree. Compute it. If computing it is expensive, memoise the computation rather than storing a second copy. **Keep server state and form state distinct.** What the server last said and what the user has typed are different things with different lifetimes. Conflating them is why "the form reset itself" bugs are so hard to reproduce. **Name state for what it is, not what it shows.** `isSubmitting` is a fact. `showSpinner` is a consequence, and it will eventually need to be true for a second reason. ## Split components along seams that will move **By responsibility, not by size.** A 400-line component that renders one coherent thing is easier to work with than four components passing state between them. **Separate what fetches from what displays.** A component that both loads and renders cannot be previewed, tested, or reused with different data. Take data as props; let a parent decide where it came from. **Keep the rules out of the markup.** Whether a discount applies is a business question with a right answer that does not depend on React. It should be a function you can test without rendering. **Push formatting to the edge.** Currency, dates and pluralisation are presentation. Keep the underlying values unformatted until the moment they are shown, or you will parse your own output later. ## Handle the states that are not "success" Every screen that loads has at least four states, and most code writes one. - **Loading**, including a second load over existing content, which is a different visual case - **Empty**, which is not an error and should not look like one - **Error**, with something the user can act on - **Partial**, where some of the data arrived If those live as branches inside one render, the component is doing five things. A small discriminated union describing the state, matched once, keeps them separable and makes it obvious when one is missing. ## What good output looks like - **Show the component boundary and the prop types.** Most of the design is visible from the signature. - **Say where each piece of state lives and why.** Ownership is the decision worth recording. - **Cover the non-success states explicitly**, or say which are out of scope. - **Point at specific components.** "The table" is not reviewable. ## What to avoid **Prop drilling as a default.** Passing a value through four components that do not use it couples all four. Either lift it out of the tree or restructure so the intermediate layers do not exist. **Premature component extraction.** Splitting a component that has one caller, to "keep files small", adds a hop with no benefit. Wait for the second use. **Effects that synchronise state.** An effect that copies one piece of state into another is almost always a derivation that should have been computed. **Styling decisions in a structural review.** Spacing and colour are real work and a different conversation. Mixing them in means the structural comments get skimmed.
From rainmanjam/poka-yoke, MIT.
More from rainmanjam/poka-yoke
- 0.607score
retro
rainmanjam
Turn a bug, outage or repeated mistake into a device that makes the whole class impossible.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
clean-code
rainmanjam
Software quality review and design guidance for any code: naming, cohesion, coupling, duplication, function size, dependency direction, and testability.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
design
rainmanjam
Design APIs, schemas, types and state machines so misuse cannot be expressed.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
guardrails
rainmanjam
Pre-commit hooks, CI gates, lint rules, database constraints and branch protection.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
llm
rainmanjam
AI features you ship to users: structured output, tool schemas, prompt injection, evals.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
ops
rainmanjam
Deploys, schema migrations, rollback and infrastructure.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
poka-yoke
rainmanjam
Mistake-proofing for anything: code, config, a schema, a process, a runbook, a form.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
ux
rainmanjam
Forms, destructive actions and flows users get wrong.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
defensive
rainmanjam
Defensive programming for any code: validating inputs at every boundary, checking for null and absent values, supplying safe fallbacks, catching and logging…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
agent-guardrails
rainmanjam
Stop an AI agent damaging your repo: PreToolUse hooks, permission deny rules, protected paths, verification gates.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
audit
rainmanjam
Find footguns in code that already exists: swappable arguments, silent fallbacks, unguarded deletes, signatures that are easy to misuse.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
authz
rainmanjam
Multi-tenant isolation, IDOR and row-level security.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 24
- Forks
- 3
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Aug 24, 2026 (2 months ago)
- Last release
- Aug 25, 2026 (2 months ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/rainmanjam/poka-yoke
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from rainmanjam
- 0.607score
agent-guardrails
rainmanjam
Stop an AI agent damaging your repo: PreToolUse hooks, permission deny rules, protected paths, verification gates.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
authz
rainmanjam
Multi-tenant isolation, IDOR and row-level security.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
clean-code
rainmanjam
Software quality review and design guidance for any code: naming, cohesion, coupling, duplication, function size, dependency direction, and testability.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
defensive
rainmanjam
Defensive programming for any code: validating inputs at every boundary, checking for null and absent values, supplying safe fallbacks, catching and logging…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
audit
rainmanjam
Find footguns in code that already exists: swappable arguments, silent fallbacks, unguarded deletes, signatures that are easy to misuse.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9 - 0.607score
data
rainmanjam
Pipelines, warehouses, dbt models and metrics, where failure is silently wrong numbers rather than a crash.
SkillBFreshness: B★ 24Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get ux running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
ux skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/rainmanjam-ux (last updated 2026-10-24)