Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/qiuyi-hong-build
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: testing
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/build
What's inside
- Skill name
build- Description
- Implement tasks incrementally — build, test, verify, commit. Add "auto" to run the whole plan in one approved pass.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 45 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
<!-- Generated from upstream/agent-skills/.claude/commands/build.md by scripts/generate-command-skills.ts; do not edit. -->
> **Pi compatibility:** Upstream `/command` references map to generated `/skill:command` skills. `agent-skills:<name>` refers to the bundled Pi skill `<name>` (`/skill:<name>`). `$ARGUMENTS` refers to arguments appended by Pi in the final `User:` line.
Invoke the agent-skills:incremental-implementation skill alongside agent-skills:test-driven-development.
## Modes
- **`/build`** — implement the *next* pending task, then stop (careful, one slice at a time).
- **`/build auto`** — generate the plan if needed, get a single approval, then implement *every* task without stopping between them.
`$ARGUMENTS` selects the mode. Treat `auto` (canonical) or `all` as autonomous mode; anything else (or empty) is the default single-task mode. Note: autonomous mode is not faster *per task* — it runs the same test-driven loop — it only removes the human stepping *between* tasks.
## Default: one task
Pick the next pending task from the plan. Then:
1. Read the task's acceptance criteria
2. Load relevant context (existing code, patterns, types)
3. Write a failing test for the expected behavior (RED)
4. Implement the minimum code to pass the test (GREEN)
5. Run the full test suite to check for regressions
6. Run the build to verify compilation
7. Commit with a descriptive message
8. Mark the task complete and stop
## Autonomous: the whole plan (`/build auto`)
Use this once a spec exists and you want to collapse plan + build into one run. It removes the manual stepping between tasks — **not** the verification. Every task still earns a passing test and its own commit.
1. **Require a spec.** Look only for a spec at a known path: `SPEC.md` at the repo root, `docs/SPEC.md`, or a file under `spec/`. A README or arbitrary doc does **not** count. If none exists, stop and tell the user to run `/spec` first — do not invent requirements.
2. **Establish a clean baseline.** Run `git status --porcelain`. If there are uncommitted changes outside the expected planning artifacts (`SPEC.md`, `docs/SPEC.md`, `spec/*`, `tasks/plan.md`, `tasks/todo.md`), stop and ask the user to commit, stash, or confirm how to handle them. Autonomous per-task commits must not absorb unrelated local work, or the clean-rollback guarantee breaks.
3. **Plan if needed.** If there is no `tasks/plan.md`, invoke agent-skills:planning-and-task-breakdown to generate one.
4. **Single checkpoint.** Present the full plan and wait for an unambiguous affirmative (e.g. "approve", "go", "yes"). Treat hedged responses ("looks reasonable", "I guess") as **not** approved. This is the only human gate — after approval, run autonomously. If you generated `tasks/plan.md`, commit it as a single preparatory commit now so it doesn't bleed into the first task's commit.
5. **Execute every task in dependency order.** Use each task's declared dependencies; if they aren't explicit, execute in the order the plan lists them. For each task, run the full default loop above (RED → GREEN → regression → build → commit → mark complete). Stage only the files that task touched plus its task-status update — never `git add -A` blindly — and make one commit per task so any point is a clean rollback.
6. **Stop and ask the user** (do not push through) when:
- a test can't be made to pass or the build breaks without an obvious fix → follow agent-skills:debugging-and-error-recovery
- the spec is ambiguous, or a task needs a decision the spec doesn't cover
- a task is high-risk or irreversible — auth/permission changes, destructive data migrations, payments, deletions, deploys, anything touching secrets, **or anything you can't undo with `git revert`** → follow agent-skills:doubt-driven-development and get explicit sign-off before continuing
After the user resolves a blocker, they re-invoke `/build auto` — it resumes from the next pending task.
7. **Summarize at the end:** tasks completed, tests added, commits made, and anything skipped, flagged, or left for the user.
If any step fails, follow the agent-skills:debugging-and-error-recovery skill.From Qiuyi-Hong/pi-addyosmani-skills, MIT.
More from Qiuyi-Hong/pi-addyosmani-skills
- 0.558score
code-simplify
Qiuyi-Hong
Simplify code for clarity and maintainability — reduce complexity without changing behavior
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
ship
Qiuyi-Hong
Run the pre-launch checklist via parallel fan-out to specialist personas, then synthesize a go/no-go decision
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
constraints
Qiuyi-Hong
Define and enforce this project's quality bar — interview, sane defaults, CONSTRAINTS.md
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.553score
review
Qiuyi-Hong
Conduct a five-axis code review — correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.553score
plan
Qiuyi-Hong
Break work into small verifiable tasks with acceptance criteria and dependency ordering
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.553score
spec
Qiuyi-Hong
Start spec-driven development — write a structured specification before writing code
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.528score
test
Qiuyi-Hong
Run TDD workflow — write failing tests, implement, verify.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Sep 22, 2026 (1 month ago)
- Last release
- Sep 28, 2026 (1 month ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from Qiuyi-Hong
- 0.558score
code-simplify
Qiuyi-Hong
Simplify code for clarity and maintainability — reduce complexity without changing behavior
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
ship
Qiuyi-Hong
Run the pre-launch checklist via parallel fan-out to specialist personas, then synthesize a go/no-go decision
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.558score
constraints
Qiuyi-Hong
Define and enforce this project's quality bar — interview, sane defaults, CONSTRAINTS.md
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.553score
review
Qiuyi-Hong
Conduct a five-axis code review — correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.553score
plan
Qiuyi-Hong
Break work into small verifiable tasks with acceptance criteria and dependency ordering
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.553score
spec
Qiuyi-Hong
Start spec-driven development — write a structured specification before writing code
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Cite this page
build skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/qiuyi-hong-build (last updated 2026-10-24)