analyzing-experiment-session-replays
Analyze session replay patterns across experiment variants to understand user behavior differences.
Skill by PostHogOfficial
Chalk Labs
Need help deploying analyzing-experiment-session-replays?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/posthog-analyzing-experiment-session-replays-13c487
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: testing, research
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions: not checked yet.
What's inside
- Skill name
analyzing-experiment-session-replays- Description
- Analyze session replay patterns across experiment variants to understand user behavior differences. Use when the user wants to see how users interact with different experiment variants, identify usability issues, compare behavior patterns between control and test groups, or get qualitative insights to complement quantitative experiment results. Also covers pairing the observed behavior with a linked survey when the user wants qualitative feedback beyond what recordings show.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 218 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Agent Skills spec issues
- files: referenced but missing: references/qualitative-feedback.md
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Analyzing experiment session replays
This skill guides you through analyzing session recordings for experiment variants to understand behavioral differences between control and test groups.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when:
- The user asks to analyze session replays for an experiment
- The user wants to understand how users behave differently across experiment variants
- The user asks to compare user behavior between control and test variants
- The user wants qualitative insights to complement experiment metrics
- The user asks questions like "How are users behaving in my experiment?" or "Show me session replays for variant X"
## Prerequisites
Before analyzing session replays:
1. The experiment must be **launched** (not in draft state)
2. Session replay must be enabled for the project
3. Users must have been exposed to the experiment variants
4. The experiment must have a start date
## Workflow
### 1. Get experiment details and feature flag variants
First, retrieve the experiment information and the feature flag variants (source of truth).
**Step 1a: Get experiment metadata**
You can either:
- **Option A**: Use the `experiment-get` tool if you already have the experiment ID from context
- **Option B**: Query the experiments table via HogQL:
```sql
SELECT
e.id,
e.name,
f.key AS feature_flag_key,
e.start_date,
e.end_date
FROM system.experiments e
JOIN system.feature_flags f ON f.id = e.feature_flag_id
WHERE e.id = <experiment_id>
```
From the experiment data, extract:
- `feature_flag_key`: The feature flag controlling the experiment
- `start_date` and `end_date`: The experiment's time range
**Step 1b: Get variants from the feature flag**
**IMPORTANT**: Always get variants from the feature flag, NOT from `experiment.parameters.feature_flag_variants`.
The parameters can be out of sync or deprecated. The feature flag is the source of truth.
Query the feature flag to get the current variants:
```sql
SELECT filters.multivariate.variants AS variants
FROM system.feature_flags
WHERE key = '<feature_flag_key>'
```
Select the variants path directly — selecting the whole `filters` object gets truncated in results for flags with large targeting configs.
Example structure: `[{"key": "control", "name": "Control", "rollout_percentage": 50}, {"key": "test", ...}]`
The variant `key` values (e.g., "control", "test", "variant_a") are what you'll use to filter session recordings.
### 2. Build session recording filters for each variant
For each variant in the experiment, construct recording filters that match users exposed to that variant.
**Filter structure for a variant** (input to `query-session-recordings-list`):
```json
{
"date_from": "<experiment.start_date>",
"date_to": "<experiment.end_date or current time>",
"filter_test_accounts": true,
"properties": [
{
"type": "event",
"key": "$feature/<feature_flag_key>",
"operator": "exact",
"value": ["<variant_key>"]
}
]
}
```
**Key points:**
- The `$feature/<flag_key>` event property records the flag's value on each event — filtering on it matches recordings where the flag was active with that variant. This is an approximation of exposure, broader than the experiment's exposure event (`$feature_flag_called`, or `$experiment_exposure` on the new rollout — both deduped per identity): right for browsing behavior across variants, but not an exact mirror of the analysis population — the `scanning-experiments-with-replay-vision` skill derives that exact filter when you need it
- `value` is an array of variant key strings (e.g. `["control"]`); for boolean flags use `["true"]` or `["false"]`
- Avoid the `type: "flag"` / `flag_evaluates_to` property filter for variant scoping — the recordings query accepts it but silently ignores it, returning unfiltered results (last verified 2026-06-10). If you want to try it anyway, verify it actually filters first: a query with a nonexistent flag key should return zero recordings
- Set the date range to the experiment's start and end dates
- Enable `filter_test_accounts: true` to exclude test users
### 3. Retrieve recordings for each variant
Use the `query-session-recordings-list` tool with the filters constructed in step 2.
Call the tool once per variant to get recordings for each group:
- Variant "control" → recordings for control group
- Variant "test" → recordings for test variant
- Additional variants if the experiment has more than 2
The tool returns a list of recordings with metadata including:
- `distinct_id` — the person's distinct ID
- `recording_duration`, `active_seconds`, `inactive_seconds`
- `click_count`, `keypress_count`, `mouse_activity_count`
- `console_log_count`, `console_warn_count`, `console_error_count`
- `start_url` — first page URL visited
- `start_time` / `end_time`, `activity_score`From PostHog/skills, MIT.
Signals
- Stars
- 75
- Forks
- 8
- Open issues
- 2
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 7, 2026 (29 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/PostHog/skills
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
- 0.674score
analyzing-experiment-session-replays
PostHogOfficial
Analyze session replay patterns across experiment variants to understand user behavior differences.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 95Claude Code +9 - 0.309score
analyzing-experiment-session-replays
anny-co
Analyze session replay patterns across experiment variants to understand user behavior differences.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
More from PostHog
- 0.759score
PostHog MCP Server
PostHogOfficial
Official PostHog MCP Server for product analytics, feature flags, experiments, and more.
ConnectorAFreshness: ARemote★ 40.4KClaude Code +3 - 0.754score
code-reviewer
PostHog
Subagent "code-reviewer" from PostHog/posthog: Use this agent when you need expert code review of recently written or modified code.
TemplateAFreshness: A★ 40.4KClaude Code - 0.683score
authoring-log-alerts
PostHogOfficial
Author useful, low-noise log alerts on services in a PostHog project.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 95Claude Code +9 - 0.683score
auditing-experiments-flags
PostHogOfficial
Audit PostHog experiments and feature flags for configuration issues, staleness, and best-practice violations.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 95Claude Code +9 - 0.683score
analyzing-offline-evaluations
PostHogOfficial
Inspect and compare offline AI evaluation experiments, diagnose case-level regressions, and follow scorer history across application, model, or prompt changes.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 95Claude Code +9 - 0.683score
authoring-error-tracking-alerts
PostHogOfficial
Author error tracking alerts that fire when an issue is created, reopened, or starts spiking.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 95Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get analyzing-experiment-session-replays running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
analyzing-experiment-session-replays skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/posthog-analyzing-experiment-session-replays-13c487 (last updated 2026-10-24)