Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

issue

Expand a rough idea into a well-structured, actionable issue — then create it in the right tracker (GitHub, Linear, Jira).

Skill by OpalBolt

IndexedMIT★ 2
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/opalbolt-issue

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Expand a rough idea into a well-structured, actionable issue — then create it in the right tracker (GitHub, Linear, Jira). Use this skill whenever a user wants to create an issue, report a bug, propose a feature, request an improvement, or track any piece of work — even if they don't use the word "issue". Trigger on phrases like "I'd like a...", "we should add...", "there's a bug with...", "can we track...", "let's make an issue for...", or any description of desired functionality or a problem that needs solving. Don't wait for the user to ask explicitly — if they describe something that should be tracked, offer to create an issue.

Use cases: documents

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/issue

What's inside

Skill name
issue
Description
Expand a rough idea into a well-structured, actionable issue — then create it in the right tracker (GitHub, Linear, Jira). Use this skill whenever a user wants to create an issue, report a bug, propose a feature, request an improvement, or track any piece of work — even if they don't use the word "issue". Trigger on phrases like "I'd like a...", "we should add...", "there's a bug with...", "can we track...", "let's make an issue for...", or any description of desired functionality or a problem that needs solving. Don't wait for the user to ask explicitly — if they describe something that should be tracked, offer to create an issue.
License
MIT
Instructions
131 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

# Issue Creator

Your goal is to turn a rough idea into a well-structured, actionable issue — then create it
in the right tracker. Work iteratively: ask focused questions, build understanding, and only
create the issue when it's genuinely worth making.

## Step 1 — Detect the tracker

Before asking anything else, figure out where issues live for this project. Check in order:

1. **CLAUDE.md or any `.claude/*.md` files** — look for mentions of GitHub, Linear, Jira,
   project keys, or tracker URLs
2. **`.github/` directory** — its presence strongly implies GitHub Issues
3. **`package.json`, `pyproject.toml`, `go.mod`** — repo metadata sometimes includes tracker links
4. **Git remote URL** — a `github.com` remote means GitHub Issues is available

If the tracker is unambiguous, proceed silently. If it is unclear or multiple trackers are
present, ask the user once: *"What issue tracker does this project use? (GitHub / Linear /
Jira / other)"*

Keep the tracker in mind — you will need it at the end.

## Step 2 — Understand the rough idea

Read what the user gave you. Before asking anything, identify the gaps:

- **Why does this matter?** — Is the motivation clear? Who is affected?
- **What does "done" look like?** — Can you describe acceptance criteria?
- **What is the scope?** — Is it clear what's in and out?
- **How should it work?** — Are there implementation decisions or preferences to surface?
- **Are there alternatives?** — Should we build it ourselves or use an existing library/package?

## Step 3 — Iterative questioning

Ask 2–3 focused questions per round — the most important gaps first. Don't dump every
question at once; pick what matters most right now. After each answer, reassess: do you
have enough, or is another round needed?

**Keep asking until the issue has all of these:**
- A clear problem statement and motivation (the *why*)
- Defined scope (what's in, what's out)
- Verifiable acceptance criteria (what does "done" look like?)
- Key implementation context or open decisions surfaced

**Good questions to draw from (use judgment, not a checklist):**
- What problem does this solve? Who runs into this and when?
- What should it look/feel/behave like? Any examples or references?
- Should we use an existing package, or build it ourselves?
- What are the edge cases or failure modes we should handle?
- What would you check to confirm it's working?
- Is anything explicitly out of scope for this issue?
- Are there related issues, PRs, or prior art we should reference?
- What's the priority — nice-to-have, or blocking something?

Be conversational. Don't interview the user — have a dialogue. If an answer raises a new
question, follow up on it before moving on.

## Step 4 — Draft the issue

Once you have enough context, produce a Markdown draft using this structure:

```
## Problem / Motivation

Why does this matter? What problem does it solve, and for whom?
Describe the "before" state — what's missing, broken, or frustrating.

## Proposed Solution

What should be built or changed? High-level description of the approach.
If there are meaningful alternatives considered, mention them briefly.

## Acceptance Criteria

- [ ] Specific, verifiable condition that defines "done"
- [ ] Another condition
- [ ] ...

## Implementation Notes

Key decisions, preferred approaches, packages to consider, constraints.
(Omit this section if there is nothing meaningful to say)

## Open Questions

- Anything still uncertain that should be resolved during implementation
(Omit this section if none)
```

Show the draft to the user:

> Here's the draft. Does this capture it correctly? Anything to add, change, or cut before
> I create it?

Apply any edits. Get a clear yes before proceeding.

## Step 5 — Create the issue

Use the right MCP tool for the detected tracker:

### GitHub

Use `mcp__plugin_github_github__issue_write`. You need:
- `owner` and `repo` — derive from the git remote (`git remote get-url origin`), or ask
- `title` — concise, imperative ("Add progress bar to model download")
- `body` — the full Markdown draft

### Linear

Authenticate first if needed (`mcp__claude_ai_Linear__authenticate`), then use the
appropriate Linear MCP tool. You need:
- Team or project identifier — check context files, or ask
- Title and description

### Jira

Authenticate first if needed (`mcp__claude_ai_Atlassian__authenticate`), then use the
appropriate Atlassian MCP tool. You need:
- Project key — check context files, or ask

From OpalBolt/Personal-AI-Marketplace, MIT.

More from OpalBolt/Personal-AI-Marketplace

Signals

Stars
2
Forks
1
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Aug 9, 2026 (2 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from OpalBolt

Cite this page

issue skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/opalbolt-issue (last updated 2026-10-24)