whats-next
Strategic next-action prioritizer: anchors on the project's north star, scores impact vs effort vs confidence vs decay, filters already-killed work, and…
Skill by nhouseholder
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/nhouseholder-whats-next
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/whats-next
What's inside
- Skill name
whats-next- Description
- Strategic next-action prioritizer: anchors on the project's north star, scores impact vs effort vs confidence vs decay, filters already-killed work, and audits its own prior recommendations. Triggers on 'whats next', 'what's next', 'what should i do', 'prioritize', 'what now', or /whats-next.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 119 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
You are a principal engineering lead. Do not summarize the project — **decide what moves the goal**, prove the ranking with numbers, and hold yourself accountable for what you recommended last time.
**Canonical SSOT:** `~/.gemini/config/skills/whats-next/SKILL.md`
---
## Phase 0 — Session context first
This runs **mid-session**. The session already holds the orientation (get-ready brief, work just done, errors just hit). That context is the **primary** candidate source.
- **Never re-run `/get-ready`** and never re-read what is already in context.
- Read the files in later phases **only** for what the session does not already hold.
- Resolve `$PROJECT_DIR` from the session; if genuinely ambiguous, `~/.claude/PROJECT_ALIASES.md`, then cwd, then ask.
## Phase 1 — North star (goal anchor)
One line: the goal, and the measured current value. This is what every candidate is ranked against.
- **Sports projects:** the gate is `/Volumes/Extreme Pro/ProjectsHQ/BACKTEST_VALIDATION_RULES.md` + the project's `BETTING_SYSTEM_RULES.md`. The objective is max ROI / N / profit / win% and Table 1 ACTIVE count. Current = ACTIVE count from the registry + live version.
- **Non-sports:** project `CLAUDE.md` goals section; else the newest handoff `## State`.
- **Never fabricate a goal.** If none is stated, print `North star: unstated` and make "name the north star" item #1.
Their gate decides promotion, never yours — do not invent a threshold or apply your own (`feedback_never-apply-own-thresholds`).
## Phase 2 — Candidate pool
Gather, tagging every candidate with its source:
1. Newest `handoffs/*.md` → `## Next` block
2. `tasks/todo.md` → `## Open now (auto — …)` section only
3. **This session** — unfinished work, errors hit, `ponytail:` shortcuts touched
4. **Gaps** — north star minus current state (e.g. "Rule 1 unmet: 8 systems grandfathered")
5. `tasks/lessons.md` last ~5 entries — a **Guard** line saying "not yet built" or "open question" is unfinished work by definition
6. Blocked items, failing tests, `🔴 STALE FLAG` ids
## Phase 3 — Dead-end filter
Drop any candidate that matches:
- `tasks/todo.md` → `### Closed … — do not re-open`
- project rules → `§ Where Not To Spend Time`
- memory `~/.claude/projects/-Users-nicholashouseholder/memory/projects/<stem>-*` files matching `killed|rejected|nogo|negative|exhausted`
- `tasks/experiment_log.jsonl` negative verdicts
**Never drop silently.** Every dropped candidate is listed under `Already killed` with where it died. Silent omission is how a dead end gets re-proposed next month.
## Phase 4 — Score
| Factor | Scale | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| **Impact** | 1–10 | 8–10 = wins a Table 1 seat, protects live money, or unblocks ≥2 other items. 1–3 = hygiene. |
| **Effort** | hours | >1 day → decompose or defer; never rank a whole multi-day block. |
| **Conf** | 0–1 | Do we know *how*? <0.5 → the action becomes a **timeboxed investigation**, not a fix. |
| **Decay** | hi/med/low | hi = money live now, in-season, data window closing, or a concurrent session will conflict. |
`Score = Impact × Conf ÷ Effort_hours` · ×1.5 if decay `hi` · ×0.7 if decay `low`.
Sort descending. Max 5 rows.
## Phase 5 — Drift check (self-audit)
Read the **last line** of `$PROJECT_DIR/tasks/whats-next-ledger.jsonl`. For each prior top-3 item, classify **Done / Partial / Ignored** from `git log --since=<ledger date>` plus handoffs written since. One line of output.
If an item appears in **3+ consecutive** ledger entries and is still Ignored:
```
⚠ recommended 3× never done — it is not actually #1, or it is blocked. Decide.
```
No ledger yet → `Drift: no prior ledger`.
## Phase 6 — Output
```
## What's Next — <project> — <date>
North star: <goal> · now: <measured>
Drift: #1 done · #2 ignored · #3 partial [⚠ stuck: <item> ×3]
| # | Action | Impact | Effort | Conf | Decay | Score |
|---|--------|--------|--------|------|-------|-------|
### #1 — <title> [<effort>]
Why now: <one line, tied to a named gap or the north star>
Start: `<exact command or file:line>`
Done when: <observable check>
### Queue
2. <title> — <one line> · src: <file>
…
### Blocked
- <item> — unblock by: <single action>
### Already killed
- <candidate> — <where it died>
```
## Phase 7 — Ledger append
Append **one** line to `$PROJECT_DIR/tasks/whats-next-ledger.jsonl` (create if missing, append only, never rewrite the file):
```json
{"date":"","version":"","head":"","north_star":"","top3":[{"title":"","impact":0,"effort_h":0,"conf":0,"decay":"","score":0,"source":""}],"blocked":[],"killed":[]}
```
---
## Rules
- **≤5** ranked items. Quality over coverage.
- **#1 must be executable with zero follow-up questions.** If it isn't, it isn't #1.
- Every item **cites the file or session event** that surfaced it.
- Blocked items are listed separately and are **never** ranked.
- Conf <0.5 → phrase as a timeboxed investigation ("30 min: determine whether X"), not a fix.
- Show the score table. The owner must be able to see why #1 beat #2 and overrule it.
**Do not read:** `CURRENT_STATE.md` (stale vs handoffs/git — same rule as `/get-ready` Phase 1.3) or `~/.claude/tasks/` (unused by these projects).From nhouseholder/cursor-laptop-skills, MIT.
More from nhouseholder/cursor-laptop-skills
- 0.524score
estimate
nhouseholder
Effort, time, and complexity estimation before starting a task.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
debate
nhouseholder
Runs a formal 3-round debate between Claude (Proposer) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (Challenger), ending with an AI verdict via backend API.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
reflect
nhouseholder
Session retrospective — review what was accomplished in this session versus the original goal.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
wrap-up
nhouseholder
Session end.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
kg
nhouseholder
Keep going — audit open work, pick the highest-leverage task, implement it end-to-end, verify, then immediately take the next highest-leverage step.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
clean-architecture-rebuild
nhouseholder
Same behavior; new seams / folders / decoupling.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
understand-and-refactor
nhouseholder
Join an unfamiliar product repo: map architecture and data flow, then apply the highest-ROI structural / duplication / perf / maintainability refactors.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
fybr
nhouseholder
Follow your best recommendation — pick one course, execute it, do not interview.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
performance-optimize
nhouseholder
Performance engineer loop — speed, memory, scalability, extra rendering.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
hq-law
nhouseholder
Always-on standing law for every Cloud Agent on any ProjectsHQ repo: honesty about what was run, fail-closed on unknowns, real-money safety for betting picks…
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
get-ready
nhouseholder
Session start, read-only.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.517score
tailscale-cloud
nhouseholder
ALWAYS ACTIVE on Cloud Agents.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Sep 6, 2026 (1 month ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from nhouseholder
- 0.524score
reflect
nhouseholder
Session retrospective — review what was accomplished in this session versus the original goal.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
debate
nhouseholder
Runs a formal 3-round debate between Claude (Proposer) and Gemini 3.1 Pro (Challenger), ending with an AI verdict via backend API.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.524score
estimate
nhouseholder
Effort, time, and complexity estimation before starting a task.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
kg
nhouseholder
Keep going — audit open work, pick the highest-leverage task, implement it end-to-end, verify, then immediately take the next highest-leverage step.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
clean-architecture-rebuild
nhouseholder
Same behavior; new seams / folders / decoupling.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9 - 0.521score
get-ready
nhouseholder
Session start, read-only.
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
Cite this page
whats-next skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/nhouseholder-whats-next (last updated 2026-10-24)