Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

executing-plans

Execute implementation plans task-by-task with review checkpoints.

Skill by mrkhachaturov

IndexedMIT
Write a review

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/mrkhachaturov-executing-plans

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Execute implementation plans task-by-task with review checkpoints. Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session. Batch execution with checkpoints for review.

Use cases: productivity

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/executing-plans

What's inside

Skill name
executing-plans
Description
Execute implementation plans task-by-task with review checkpoints. Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session. Batch execution with checkpoints for review.
License
MIT
Instructions
271 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Agent Skills spec issues

  • allowed-tools: must be a space-separated string

Files (2)

  • SKILL.md
  • SKILL.md.tmpl

SKILL.md (first lines)

<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from SKILL.md.tmpl — do not edit directly -->
<!-- Regenerate: just build -->

## Preamble (run first)

```bash
# === RKstack Preamble (executing-plans) ===

# Read detection cache (written by session-start via rkstack detect)
if [ -f .rkstack/settings.json ]; then
  cat .rkstack/settings.json
else
  echo "WARNING: .rkstack/settings.json not found — detection cache missing"
fi

# Session-volatile checks (can change mid-session)
_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
_HAS_CLAUDE_MD=$([ -f CLAUDE.md ] && echo "yes" || echo "no")
echo "BRANCH: $_BRANCH"
echo "CLAUDE_MD: $_HAS_CLAUDE_MD"
```

Use the detection cache and preamble output to adapt your behavior:
- **TypeScript/JavaScript** — see `detection.flowType` (web or default). If web: check React/Vue/Svelte patterns, responsive design, component architecture. If default: CLI tools, MCP servers, backend scripts.
- **Python** — backend/ML/scripts. Check PEP8 conventions, pytest for testing.
- **Go** — backend/infra. Check error handling patterns, go test.
- **Rust** — systems. Check ownership patterns, cargo test.
- **Java/C#** — enterprise. Check build tool (Maven/Gradle/.NET), framework conventions.
- **Ruby** — web/scripting. Check Gemfile, Rails conventions if present.
- **Terraform/HCL** — infrastructure as code. Plan before apply, extra caution with state.
- **Ansible** — configuration management. Check inventory, role conventions, vault usage.
- **Docker/Compose** — containerized. Check service dependencies, .env patterns.
- **justfile** — task runner present. Use `just` commands instead of raw shell.
- **mise** — tool version manager. Versions are pinned — don't suggest global installs.
- **CLAUDE.md exists** — read it for project-specific commands and conventions.
- Read `detection.stack` for what's in the project and `detection.stats` for scale (files, code, complexity).
- Read `detection.repoMode` for solo vs collaborative.
- Read `detection.services` for Supabase and other service integrations.

## AskUserQuestion Format

**ALWAYS follow this structure for every AskUserQuestion call:**
1. **Re-ground:** State the project, the current branch (use the `_BRANCH` value from preamble — NOT any branch from conversation history or gitStatus), and the current plan/task. (1-2 sentences)
2. **Simplify:** Explain the problem in plain English a smart 16-year-old could follow. No raw function names, no internal jargon, no implementation details. Use concrete examples and analogies. Say what it DOES, not what it's called.
3. **Recommend:** `RECOMMENDATION: Choose [X] because [one-line reason]` — always prefer the complete option over shortcuts (see Completeness Principle). Include `Completeness: X/10` for each option. Calibration: 10 = complete implementation (all edge cases, full coverage), 7 = covers happy path but skips some edges, 3 = shortcut that defers significant work.
4. **Options:** Lettered options: `A) ... B) ... C) ...` — when an option involves effort, show both scales: `(human: ~X / CC: ~Y)`

Assume the user hasn't looked at this window in 20 minutes and doesn't have the code open. If you'd need to read the source to understand your own explanation, it's too complex.

## Completeness Principle

AI makes completeness near-free. Always recommend the complete option over shortcuts — the delta is minutes with AI. A "lake" (100% coverage, all edge cases) is boilable; an "ocean" (full rewrite, multi-quarter migration) is not. Boil lakes, flag oceans.

**Effort reference** — always show both scales:

| Task type | Human team | CC + AI | Compression |
|-----------|-----------|---------|-------------|
| Boilerplate | 2 days | 15 min | ~100x |
| Tests | 1 day | 15 min | ~50x |
| Feature | 1 week | 30 min | ~30x |
| Bug fix | 4 hours | 15 min | ~20x |

Include `Completeness: X/10` for each option (10=all edge cases, 7=happy path, 3=shortcut).

## Completion Status

When completing a skill workflow, report status using one of:
- **DONE** — All steps completed successfully. Evidence provided for each claim.
- **DONE_WITH_CONCERNS** — Completed, but with issues the user should know about. List each concern.
- **BLOCKED** — Cannot proceed. State what is blocking and what was tried.
- **NEEDS_CONTEXT** — Missing information required to continue. State exactly what you need.

### Escalation

It is always OK to stop and say "this is too hard for me" or "I'm not confident in this result."

Bad work is worse than no work. You will not be penalized for escalating.
- If you have attempted a task 3 times without success, STOP and escalate.
- If you are uncertain about a security-sensitive change, STOP and escalate.
- If the scope of work exceeds what you can verify, STOP and escalate.

Escalation format:
```
STATUS: BLOCKED | NEEDS_CONTEXT
REASON: [1-2 sentences]
ATTEMPTED: [what you tried]
RECOMMENDATION: [what the user should do next]
```

# Executing Plans

## Overview

Execute implementation plans task-by-task in the current session. This is the inline execution alternative to subagent-driven-development — you stay in the same session, executing each task sequentially with periodic checkpoint reviews.

**Announce at start:** "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."

**When to use this skill:**
- You have a written plan (from writing-plans or similar) with numbered tasks and steps
- You want batch execution with human checkpoints, not subagent dispatch
- The plan is small-to-medium scope (1-15 tasks)

**When to prefer subagent-driven-development instead:**
- Large plans (15+ tasks) where fresh context per task matters
- Tasks that are highly independent and benefit from isolation

## Step 1: Load the Plan

1. Read the plan file the user provides
2. Extract all tasks — look for `### Task N:` headers with `- [ ]` checkbox steps
3. Count total tasks and steps
4. Review the plan critically before starting:
   - Are any steps ambiguous or missing details?
   - Are there dependency ordering issues?
   - Do verification commands look correct for this project's stack?
5. If concerns exist, raise them with AskUserQuestion before proceeding
6. Create TodoWrite entries — one per task, all set to `pending`

```
Announce: "Plan loaded: N tasks, M total steps. [Any concerns or ready to start.]"

From mrkhachaturov/rkstack, MIT.

More from mrkhachaturov/rkstack

Signals

Stars
0
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Mar 30, 2026 (7 months ago)
Last release
Apr 18, 2026 (6 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from mrkhachaturov

Cite this page

executing-plans skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/mrkhachaturov-executing-plans (last updated 2026-10-24)