maintain-verification-skill
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
Skill by minosx31
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/minosx31-maintain-verification-skill
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: security
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions: not checked yet.
What's inside
- Skill name
maintain-verification-skill- Description
- Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature, at most one PR of proven corrections. Use for /maintain-verification-skill or "audit the verify skill".
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 35 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Maintain a verification skill A feature map rots the moment the app changes. This skill is the upkeep loop for a skill generated by `/create-verification-skill` (or any project-local verification skill with a feature map). The unit of rigor is the feature, not every sentence: cover every feature file from source and exercise every feature live, without terminalising every bullet. ## Outcomes Pick one, and say which: - **clean** — every feature got source and live coverage; nothing worth shipping. No branch, no PR. - **changed** — one PR ships proven doc, harness, or map corrections. - **blocked** — coverage could not finish or a proven fix could not ship safely. Say exactly what blocked it. ## Edit scope Only edit the verification skill's own directory (its SKILL.md, features/, and any harness scripts it owns). Never edit product code during a run: a behavior the map describes that the app no longer does is either doc drift (fix the map) or a product regression (report it, don't paper over it in docs). ## Pass 0. **Locate the target.** Find the verification skill to maintain: the project-local skill whose body has launch/drive sections and a feature map (usually `.claude/skills/verify-*/`). Several candidates → ask which one; none → stop and point at `/create-verification-skill` instead of inventing a target. 1. **Index hygiene.** Read the feature map README and glob its sibling files. Fix missing, extra, duplicate, or dead entries. Lightweight; no generated inventory. 2. **Source wave.** One read-only subagent per feature file, launched concurrently. Each explains "how does this user-facing feature work?" from source, flags likely doc drift with citations, and returns one concise live-verification recipe. Children never drive the app and never edit files. Return shape: feature summary / source entry points / likely drift or none / one recipe. 3. **Reconcile.** Every feature file has a returned summary. Merge overlapping recipes into as few app states as practical. Spot-check cited drift; don't re-prove clean claims. Sweep recent churn for user-facing surfaces missing from the map — require a concrete source path before calling one missing. 4. **Live pass.** Required even when source looks clean. The coordinator owns all driving; follow the verification skill's own launch model — one long-lived instance driven serially for servers and UIs, or a fresh isolated session per drive for short-lived CLIs (the skill's Launch section decides, not this one). Exercise every feature at least once, and hold three invariants the whole pass, whatever the failure: (1) never drive an instance you haven't health-checked since it last did something surprising — doctor before first drive, doctor on each fresh session where sessions are the unit, doctor again after any failed drive, and where doctor can't see the failure (a wedged UI state on a healthy process), reset to a known state or relaunch rather than hoping; (2) evidence captured so far survives every cleanup, checked at its named location, not assumed; (3) nothing a drive started outlives that drive's usefulness — failed-iteration residue is cleaned whether the session is stuck, exited, or shared (for a shared instance, clean the residue, not the instance). A doctor failure caused by skill drift is drift: fix it under edit scope and retry once — restart whatever the fix invalidated, nothing more — before calling the pass `blocked`. A feature that can't be reached is `verified-unreachable` only with the concrete prerequisite (auth, entitlement, OS, external state) and the route attempted; if the map omits that prerequisite, that's drift. Any harness fix from triage gets re-driven live before it ships. Final teardown happens after the last drive of the run — including those re-proofs — so nothing outlives the run (evidence stays, per the skill). 5. **Triage.** Wrong or missing user-POV description → doc drift, fix it. Working behavior the harness can't drive → harness gap, fix it; a harness fix follows the same helpers rule as generation (scripts executable, invocation documented in the skill body). App behavior that's actually broken → product gap; record it for the user, keep it out of this PR. 6. **Ship or stop.** For changed: one PR of proven corrections, re-read every changed file first. For clean or blocked: no PR, report the outcome and the coverage honestly. Keep concise run notes (features covered, unreachable prerequisites, confirmed drift, outcome) in a scratch location; don't commit them.
From minosx31/mh-harness, MIT.
More from minosx31/mh-harness
- 0.541score
how
minosx31
Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
interrogate
minosx31
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart".
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
poteto-mode
minosx31
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
architect
minosx31
Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.536score
arena
minosx31
Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.533score
no-comments
minosx31
Spawn Comment Sicko, fix accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 24, 2026 (5 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/minosx31/mh-harness
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
- 0.599score
maintain-verification-skill
adjohn
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 8Claude Code +9 - 0.335score
maintain-verification-skill
plicjo
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.322score
maintain-verification-skill
RayenTellissy
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.322score
maintain-verification-skill
adnjkm
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.319score
maintain-verification-skill
shishirmehto
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.319score
maintain-verification-skill
luarss
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.311score
maintain-verification-skill
IgorKhramtsov
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillBFreshness: B★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.298score
maintain-verification-skill
MatrixMagician
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillBFreshness: BClaude Code +9
More from minosx31
- 0.541score
how
minosx31
Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
interrogate
minosx31
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart".
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
poteto-mode
minosx31
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
architect
minosx31
Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.536score
arena
minosx31
Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.533score
no-comments
minosx31
Spawn Comment Sicko, fix accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Cite this page
maintain-verification-skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/minosx31-maintain-verification-skill (last updated 2026-10-24)