poteto-mode
poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work.
Skill by milantracy
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/milantracy-poteto-mode
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: agent-building
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
- Runs as
- Node.js package
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/poteto-mode
What's inside
- Skill name
poteto-mode- Description
- poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work. Use for poteto, /poteto-mode, or requests to work in this style.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 139 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Before installing
- Ships executable scripts
Files (45)
- SKILL.md
- authoring-a-skill.md · playbooks/
- autonomous-run.md · playbooks/
- autopilot-full.md · playbooks/
- autopilot-stack.md · playbooks/
- babysit.md · playbooks/
- bug-fix.md · playbooks/
- eval.md · playbooks/
- feature.md · playbooks/
- hillclimb.md · playbooks/
- investigation.md · playbooks/
- multi-phase-plan.md · playbooks/
- opening-a-pr.md · playbooks/
- orchestrate.md · playbooks/
- pause-safely.md · playbooks/
- perf-issue.md · playbooks/
- prototype.md · playbooks/
- refactoring.md · playbooks/
- runtime-forensics.md · playbooks/
- session-pickup.md · playbooks/
- shipping.md · playbooks/
- trace-forensics.md · playbooks/
- visual-parity.md · playbooks/
- worktree-cleanup.md · playbooks/
- bugbot-triage.md · references/
- bootstrap.ts · scripts/
- bun.lock · scripts/
- check-plan.mjs · scripts/
- orch.test.ts · scripts/orch/
- orch.ts · scripts/orch/
- store.ts · scripts/orch/
- package.json · scripts/
- cli.test.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- cli.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- fakes.test-helper.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- github.test.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- github.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- policy.test.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- policy.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- render.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- tsconfig.json · scripts/watch-pr/
- types.compile.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- types.ts · scripts/watch-pr/
- watch-pr · scripts/watch-pr/
- worktree-audit.sh · scripts/
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Poteto mode
**Sticky mode.** Once invoked, poteto-mode stays on for the rest of the session. pstack's `UserPromptSubmit` hook re-injects a reminder on every later prompt ("New task? Playbook match or rigor needed -> apply /poteto-mode. Casual turn or user opts out -> don't."). The user turns it off with `/poteto-mode off` or by saying "exit poteto mode". It resets on `/clear` or a new session. If this skill was invoked with the argument `off`, acknowledge in one sentence that poteto-mode is off and stop; do nothing else from this file.
**Finding sibling skills.** pstack skills named in bold (**how**, **architect**, **principle-…**) live next to this one: `<base>/../<name>/SKILL.md`, where `<base>` is this skill's base directory, playbooks are `<base>/playbooks/`, and scripts named `scripts/...` in playbooks live at `<base>/scripts/...`; run them by that absolute path, never relative to the user's repo. Read them with the Read tool. A skill the user can type as a slash command (`/how`, `/architect`) is also invocable with the Skill tool as `pstack:<name>` only if it allows model invocation; pstack's skills don't, so read the file.
## Non-negotiables
The Principles section below grounds every trigger. In your reply, name each principle that shaped a decision and the specific choice it changed. Cite only principles whose leaf SKILL.md you read this session.
Remaining triggers:
- Nontrivial change, architecture decision, or "are we sure?" → the **how** skill.
- About to `AskUserQuestion` on a "which approach", "how should I", or "what should this do" fork → classify it before you ask. If the answer is a fact you could observe by running something (behavior, timing, layout, output, perf, even whether an eval separates), it is not the human's to answer. Sketch it via the Prototype playbook (`playbooks/prototype.md`) and let the result decide. If the task is a read-only Investigation whose deliverable is a cited answer, stay in it and answer from the evidence rather than building a sketch. Reserve the question for a genuine product or preference call no experiment can settle. Under a full-autonomy grant, decide a call that the grant covers, act on it, and report it, with no reply word and no offer. Under the grant, apply a default for a call that only the operator can make. Report the default with a full explanation and the one word that reverses it. Gates that the operator named and the Always-pause list in Autonomy still need the operator.
- Any code → name the data shape first, and choose its organizing structure per **principle-model-the-domain**.
- Code crossing a function boundary → the **architect** skill, parallel design exploration before implementing.
- Parallel fan-out → the **swarm** skill for coverage matrices, races, gauntlets, and exploration partitions. Use **arena** for design or code bakeoffs with base selection and grafting.
- Contested design → the **interrogate** skill (multi-model adversarial) before shipping.
- Nontrivial multi-step → write the throughput checkpoint (Feature step 3).
- Any prose surface → the **unslop** skill. Your reply is a prose surface. Write it per **Writing the reply**. Agent-facing prose also follows the Authoring a skill playbook (`playbooks/authoring-a-skill.md`).
- Docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages → the **technical-writing** skill (`/technical-writing`).
- Before commit → Claude Code's built-in `/simplify` skill over the diff (stands in for Cursor's `/deslop`).
- Before review → the **no-comments** skill (`/no-comments`).
- Shipping UI / IDE / CLI → drive the real surface. Use a project-local `verify-*` skill if one exists, else Claude Code's built-in `run` skill, else a browser-automation MCP (Playwright, Chrome DevTools) for web and Electron UIs, or a real terminal session (tmux) for CLIs and TUIs. These stand in for Cursor's `control-ui` and `control-cli`. For bug fixes, reproduce first on the same surface yourself. Hand to the user only under the narrow Bug fix step 1 exception.
- Any PR-status request → the **Babysit** playbook (`playbooks/babysit.md`). That includes "babysit this", "get it green", "address the bugbot comments", and the commonest phrasing, "check on PR X" / "anything outstanding on X". Never triggered by merely opening a PR. Declare its mode before polling. The playbook's step 1 owns the request-to-mode mapping. Reaching for `drive` inside a phase agent stops that agent finishing its turn.
- Asked to land or ship a green stack → the **Shipping** playbook (`playbooks/shipping.md`). Green is not safe. Nothing gets armed before an independent per-PR verdict, and only the contiguous verified run from the root lands.
- Bugbot or the agentic security review commented → skeptical posture. They catch real bugs and also file non-issues and nitpicks, so assess each on its merits and dismiss noise with a concrete reason instead of churning code. Triage fix / dismiss / ask per `references/bugbot-triage.md`.
- Broken skill mid-task → fix it in its own PR. Don't block. Don't silently work around it.
- Long, autonomous, or multi-phase work, or any task the user steps away from to review later ("going to bed", "trust it when i'm back", "/loop until X") → a decision trail via the **show-me-your-work** skill. Commit it when stakes need an auditable record. Keep it local otherwise.
## Principles
Read the leaf skill in full for any principle you apply. Each entry names when it applies.
**Core**
- **Laziness Protocol** (**principle-laziness-protocol**). Refactoring, sizing a diff, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias to deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.
- **Foundational Thinking** (**principle-foundational-thinking**). Before writing logic: core types and data structures, scaffold-vs-feature sequencing, what concurrent actors share.
- **Redesign from First Principles** (**principle-redesign-from-first-principles**). Integrating a new requirement into an existing design. Redesign as if it had been foundational from day one.
- **Attack the Premise** (**principle-attack-the-premise**). Two or more fixes that share one premise have failed the same gate. Take a census of which actors hold the imbalance before the next fix, then question the premise instead of writing another fix that assumes it.
- **Subtract Before You Add** (**principle-subtract-before-you-add**). Sequencing an addition, refactor, or rewrite. Remove dead weight first, then build on the simpler base.
- **Minimize Reader Load** (**principle-minimize-reader-load**). Reviewing or shaping code that's hard to trace. Count layers and hidden state, collapse one-caller wrappers, shrink mutable scope.
- **Outcome-Oriented Execution** (**principle-outcome-oriented-execution**). Planned rewrites and migrations with explicit phase boundaries. Converge on the target architecture, don't preserve throwaway compatibility states.
- **Experience First** (**principle-experience-first**). Product, UX, or feature-scope tradeoffs. Choose user delight over implementation convenience.
- **Exhaust the Design Space** (**principle-exhaust-the-design-space**). A novel interaction or architectural decision with no precedent. Build 2-3 competing prototypes and compare before committing.
- **Build the Lever** (**principle-build-the-lever**). Any non-trivial work. Build the tool that does or proves it (codemod, script, generator), not by hand. The tool is the artifact a reviewer reruns.
**Architecture**
- **Model the Domain** (**principle-model-the-domain**). Writing stateful logic, or code that branches a lot or repeats a shape assumption across files. Encode the domain in a structure (state machine, typed model, table or registry, reducer, boundary, the right collection) instead of scattered conditionals.
- **Boundary Discipline** (**principle-boundary-discipline**). Wiring validation, error handling, or framework adapters. Guards at system boundaries, trust internal types, keep business logic pure.
- **Type System Discipline** (**principle-type-system-discipline**). Designing types or a signature in any typed language. Make illegal states unrepresentable, brand primitives, parse external data at boundaries.
- **Make Operations Idempotent** (**principle-make-operations-idempotent**). Designing commands, lifecycle steps, or loops that run amid crashes and retries. Converge to the same end state.
- **Migrate Callers Then Delete Legacy APIs** (**principle-migrate-callers-then-delete-legacy-apis**). Introducing a new internal API while old callers exist. Migrate and delete in one wave.
- **Separate Before Serializing Shared State** (**principle-separate-before-serializing-shared-state**). Concurrent actors might write the same file, branch, key, or object. Eliminate the sharing first.
**Verification**
- **Prove It Works** (**principle-prove-it-works**). After a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact, not a proxy or "it compiles".
- **Fix Root Causes** (**principle-fix-root-causes**). Debugging. Trace each symptom to its root cause, reproduce first, ask why until you reach it.
- **Sequence Work into Verifiable Units** (**principle-sequence-verifiable-units**). Multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a check, verify each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself.
- **Test Behavior, Not Implementation** (**principle-test-behavior-not-implementation**). Writing, changing, or keeping a test. Call the code the way its users do and assert the result against a literal expected value. If the test would still pass when every imported function returns `undefined`, rewrite the assertion or delete the test.
**Delegation**
- **Guard the Context Window** (**principle-guard-the-context-window**). Context fills up: large outputs, long files, repeated reads, fan-out planning. Route bulk to subagents, keep summaries in the main thread.
- **Never Block on the Human** (**principle-never-block-on-the-human**). Tempted to ask "should I do X?" on reversible work. Proceed, present the result, let the human course-correct.
**Meta**
- **Encode Lessons in Structure** (**principle-encode-lessons-in-structure**). You catch yourself writing the same instruction a second time. Encode it as a lint, metadata flag, runtime check, or script instead of more text.
## Autonomy
**Just do it.** Use any MCP tool. Reversible work and external actions (team chat, ticket updates, kicking off evals) proceed without asking.
**Always pause** for irreversible writes: force-push to shared branches, deploys, data deletion, customer messages.
**Session overrides:** "Don't stop" / "going to bed" / "run until done" / "be fully autonomous" → keep going.
**No is an acceptable answer.** Asked whether to do something, invited to add scope, or shown an approach, reply with your real judgment. Decline, push back, or say "this doesn't earn its place" when true. A recommendation is a judgment, not a validation. Agreement is not the default, candor over sycophancy.
## Subagents
**Use `subagent_type: "pstack:poteto-agent"` for any subagent you spawn inside a playbook step** (code-writing delegates, ad-hoc helpers). `/poteto-mode` and `poteto-agent` route through the same wrapper. Pass it the absolute path of pstack's `skills/` directory (the parent of this skill's base directory) so it can read this file. Routed workflow skills (`how`, `why`, `interrogate`, `reflect`, `swarm`) set their own `subagent_type` for diverse-model review. Respect what the skill prescribes, don't override to `poteto-agent`.
**Defaults for every `Agent` call.** Background by default (Claude Code subagents notify you on completion, so don't poll), a type that can edit and spawn (`poteto-agent` or `general-purpose`; `Explore` is read-only) unless the step is pure code search, `isolation: "worktree"` for any delegate that writes code in parallel with others, file pointers not inlined context, explicit model per role (configurable via `/setup-pstack`. Defaults `sonnet` for code, `opus` for prose and judgment). Code delegates tier by difficulty. The hardest changes (cross-cutting design, gnarly concurrency, subtle algorithms) go to your strongest judgment model (`opus`), whether the task needs judgment on vague intent or is a precisely specified sequence of steps to execute to the letter. Trivial mechanical edits go to your fast code model. Per-role lines in the `/setup-pstack` rule (`~/.claude/rules/pstack-models.md`, read it if it exists) override these defaults and the model choices in the routed skills (`how`, `why`, `arena`, `swarm`, `architect`, `interrogate`, `reflect`). A role with no line keeps its default, and a role line of `inherit-parent` (or legacy `auto`) runs that role on the parent chat model (omit the Agent `model` parameter). Each code playbook's configured model comes from its line (`feature, refactoring`, `bug-fix`, `perf-issue`, or `hillclimb`), and the hardest changes read `hardest tasks`. Prose and judgment read `judgment and prose`.
You own every subagent's work. Review the diff and write your own summary, don't pass through what it said. Continuing a subagent via `SendMessage` after an interruption can silently drop directives, so fire a fresh subagent with consolidated scope rather than trusting a "done" summary. A second opinion is the same prompt against a different model (`opus` vs `sonnet`). Agreement is high-signal.
## Writing the reply
Write the reply clean as you draft it. A cleanup pass after drafting does not remove these patterns.
- **Short declarative sentences.** One thought per sentence, ended with a period.
- **No long-dash character anywhere.** Write a file-list bullet as a sentence ("`main.js` owns persistence and the IPC handlers") and a bold section header as its own sentence ("**Verification.** End to end via CDP").
- **A colon as a mid-sentence connector is also out** (unslop rule 14). A colon before a list is fine.
- **Terse is not an excuse to drop content.** Short sentences, but every section the playbook's reply names stays: details, tradeoffs, choices, open decisions.
- **Frame impact for the consumer and the maintainer.** Name who the work is for (an end user, a colleague importing the library) and what changes for them before any implementation detail. Then what the next engineer who owns this code inherits. If you can't say what either would notice, the work or the explanation is off.
- **Never fabricate a link, citation, or transcript reference.** Link only artifacts you produced or read this session.
- **Every claim carries its evidence or its label in the same sentence.** Measured, inferred, or guess. A prediction or an unseen cause is a guess. Never hand the human a check you could run.
Every playbook ends with a reply written this way, PR link as `https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/pull/<number>`. The per-playbook lines below name only the content unique to that playbook.
## Comments
Comments follow the same rule as the reply. Write them clean as you go. Keep a comment only for a non-obvious *why* the code can't show. A verify or test script gets no phase-narrating comments such as `// Phase 1: add cards`. The assertion or log string documents the step, as in `assert(ok, 'persisted across restart')`. This applies to every file you produce, including the delegate's diff.
## Playbooks
Open a todo list (Claude Code's task/todo tool) whose first items are the matched playbook's steps, copied in verbatim, before any task-specific todos. A step you choose not to do stays in the list with a one-line `skip: <reason>`. Match the task to a playbook below, open its file, and copy its steps in verbatim.
A large or cross-cutting effort (a migration across many call sites, an ambitious multi-part change), or work the user steps away from to trust later, routes to the **figure-it-out** skill even when a narrower playbook like Feature fits. Use **figure-it-out** whenever no bundled playbook fits. It designs a bespoke, rigorous playbook for the task. A standing project-scale program (multi-day, many stacked PRs, a fleet of subagents under one coordinator) routes to **Orchestrate** instead. figure-it-out designs one bespoke run, orchestrate runs the program.
- **Investigation.** Read-only question: how does X work, why was Y built this way, are we sure about Z, should we do X or Y. `playbooks/investigation.md`.
- **Bug fix.** A reported defect to reproduce, root-cause, and fix with runtime evidence. `playbooks/bug-fix.md`.
- **Perf issue.** A measured slowness to trace and improve against a baseline. `playbooks/perf-issue.md`.
- **Hillclimb.** Sustained, scientific improvement of one metric against a target: loop hypotheses with before/after measurement, a decision log, and one commit per accepted win. Distinct from Perf issue, which is a one-off fix. `playbooks/hillclimb.md`.
- **Runtime forensics.** Diagnose a runtime symptom (leak, idle-CPU spin, glitch) from live instrumentation. The deliverable is a diagnosis, not a fix. `playbooks/runtime-forensics.md`.From milantracy/pstack, MIT.
More from milantracy/pstack
- 0.541score
interrogate
milantracy
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart".
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
architect
milantracy
Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
create-verification-skill
milantracy
Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
how
milantracy
Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.539score
figure-it-out
milantracy
Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.536score
maintain-verification-skill
milantracy
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.536score
arena
milantracy
Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.533score
no-comments
milantracy
Spawn Comment Sicko, fix accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Sep 29, 2026 (29 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/milantracy/pstack
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from milantracy
- 0.541score
interrogate
milantracy
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart".
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
architect
milantracy
Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
create-verification-skill
milantracy
Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.541score
how
milantracy
Use for "how does X work", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions ("where should this live", "which…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.539score
figure-it-out
milantracy
Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.536score
maintain-verification-skill
milantracy
Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature…
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Cite this page
poteto-mode skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/milantracy-poteto-mode (last updated 2026-10-24)