principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test.
Skill by matthewyjiang
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/matthewyjiang-principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: testing, writing
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions: not checked yet.
What's inside
- Skill name
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation- Description
- Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Assert what the code's users can observe, so that the test fails when that behavior breaks and keeps passing when only the internals change.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 18 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (1)
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Test Behavior, Not Implementation Read [the workflow contract](../../references/workflow-contract.md). A test is a claim about what the code does for its users: a caller, an end user, or another service. Behavior is what those users can observe through the interface they use. That includes return values, errors, state they can read back, and effects on systems outside the code, such as a request sent, a row written, or a message emitted. Implementation is what they cannot observe: private helpers, internal call order, intermediate data, and which internal collaborator did the work. Judge each test against two imagined edits: - **Break the behavior.** Make the code return a wrong value, skip an effect, or do the effect twice. If the test still passes, it proves nothing. The usual causes are an assertion looser than the contract, an expected value computed by the code under test, a restated constant or prompt string that never runs the code that reads it, and an assertion on data that the test built itself. - **Change the internals.** Keep every observable result the same and restructure the code underneath. If the test now fails, it is pinned to the implementation. It will need a rewrite on every refactor and still catches no bug. Keep a test that catches the first edit and survives the second. Rewrite or delete the rest. To write a test that does both, drive the code through its users' interface with a concrete input. Derive the expected value from the requirement, not from a run of the code. Assert what the contract promises, no less and no more. The contract decides, not the shape of the assertion. When "an empty cart never charges" is the promise, an assertion that the payment client got no call is behavior. Pair it with a case where the charge happens, so that the test shows it can see a call. The payload that a mocked external service receives is behavior, because that service observes it. A call to an internal helper is implementation, because no user can see it. An empty list is the exact answer when no record matches, and a hollow check when the test only needs some result. An exact error message pins wording that no caller reads. The error type that callers branch on is the contract. A test can pin an invariant instead of a call, such as a key that must exist in two tables or a compile-time type check. The invariant is the behavior.
From matthewyjiang/rho-pstack, MIT.
More from matthewyjiang/rho-pstack
- 0.567score
interrogate
matthewyjiang
Optional adversarial cross-model review to challenge a design or find blind spots, using per-call agent models or host delegation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
architect
matthewyjiang
Sketch caller usage, types, signatures and module ownership before nontrivial implementation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
how
matthewyjiang
Explain subsystem architecture, runtime flow, placement, ownership, or layering before changing code.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
correct
matthewyjiang
Turn recurring agent mistakes into structural prevention: architecture, types, actionable lint, then behavior tests.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
blast-radius
matthewyjiang
Trace what a change could break beyond its diff and prove the load-bearing safety assumptions through real code.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.536score
principle-build-the-lever
matthewyjiang
Apply to any non-trivial work, not just bulk work: edits, migrations, analyses, checks.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.536score
principle-boundary-discipline
matthewyjiang
Apply when wiring validation, error handling, or framework adapters.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.531score
principle-experience-first
matthewyjiang
Apply when product, UX, or feature-scope tradeoffs come up.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 17, 2026 (12 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/matthewyjiang/rho-pstack
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
Same skill elsewhere
Copies of this SKILL.md published by others; search shows only one of them.
- 0.756score
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
backnotprop
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2.7KClaude Code +9 - 0.396score
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
dsebban
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 68Claude Code +9 - 0.382score
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
jiangkoumo
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 27Claude Code +9 - 0.360score
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
creedants
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 15Claude Code +9 - 0.351score
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
edlng
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 2Claude Code +9 - 0.344score
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
aayushbtw
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 1Claude Code +9 - 0.334score
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation
dotts-h
Apply when you write, change, or keep a test.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
More from matthewyjiang
- 0.567score
interrogate
matthewyjiang
Optional adversarial cross-model review to challenge a design or find blind spots, using per-call agent models or host delegation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
architect
matthewyjiang
Sketch caller usage, types, signatures and module ownership before nontrivial implementation.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.567score
how
matthewyjiang
Explain subsystem architecture, runtime flow, placement, ownership, or layering before changing code.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
correct
matthewyjiang
Turn recurring agent mistakes into structural prevention: architecture, types, actionable lint, then behavior tests.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.561score
blast-radius
matthewyjiang
Trace what a change could break beyond its diff and prove the load-bearing safety assumptions through real code.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9 - 0.536score
principle-build-the-lever
matthewyjiang
Apply to any non-trivial work, not just bulk work: edits, migrations, analyses, checks.
SkillAFreshness: AClaude Code +9
Cite this page
principle-test-behavior-not-implementation skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/matthewyjiang-principle-test-behavior-not-implementation (last updated 2026-10-24)