Skip to content
Agentmart
Submit a tool

Retrieval-Reasoning Gap Mitigation

Mitigate cases where retrieved facts are present but the model ignores them or contradicts them.

Skill by maksim-tsi

IndexedMIT
Write a review

Chalk Labs

Need help deploying Retrieval-Reasoning Gap Mitigation?

Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.

Book a call

Install

Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.

npx agentmarket install skill/maksim-tsi-retrieval-reasoning-gap-mitigation

Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.

Get the weekly diff

The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.

We use your email only for this newsletter. Privacy

About

Mitigate cases where retrieved facts are present but the model ignores them or contradicts them. Keywords: retrieval-reasoning gap, ignores context, hallucination, grounding, evidence table.

No reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work

Permissions

What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md. Checked Oct 25, 2026.

Tools
No tools found
Secrets
None asked for
Install scripts
None found

Network hosts it talks to 1

  • codeload.github.com · found in install command

Files it touches

  • ~/.claude/skills/retrieval-reasoning-gap-mitigation

What's inside

Skill name
Retrieval-Reasoning Gap Mitigation
Description
Mitigate cases where retrieved facts are present but the model ignores them or contradicts them. Keywords: retrieval-reasoning gap, ignores context, hallucination, grounding, evidence table.
License
MIT
Compatibility
YAAM runtime agents (LangGraph ToolRuntime)
Metadata
yaam.layer: policy · yaam.mechanism_contract: docs/specs/spec-mechanism-maturity-and-freeze.md
Instructions
50 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub

Agent Skills spec issues

  • name: only lowercase letters, digits and single hyphens allowed
  • name: "Retrieval-Reasoning Gap Mitigation" does not match folder "retrieval-reasoning-gap-mitigation"
  • allowed-tools: must be a space-separated string

Files (1)

  • SKILL.md

SKILL.md (first lines)

## When to Use

- The model’s draft answer contradicts retrieved facts, or fails to use them.
- The user request requires multi-step reasoning grounded in specific evidence.

## Inputs and Outputs

- **Input:** user question + retrieved context (context block and/or tier queries).
- **Output:** an answer that explicitly cites evidence items, plus a short “evidence used” section when appropriate.

## Procedure (Recipe)

1. **Grounding pass (minimal):**
   - Call `get_context_block(format="text")` with conservative limits.
   - If the question is specific, call exactly one targeted retrieval tool:
     - `l2_search_facts` for exact identifiers,
     - `l3_query_graph` for relationships/timelines,
     - `l3_search_episodes` for precedents,
     - `l4_search_knowledge` / `synthesize_knowledge` for patterns.
2. **Evidence table:**
   - Extract 3–7 atomic claims from retrieved results.
   - For each claim, include: `claim`, `source_tier`, `supporting_snippet`, and `confidence`.
3. **Reasoning constraint:**
   - Answer the user question **only** using the evidence table.
   - If evidence is insufficient, ask 1 clarification question (or state what is missing).
4. **Contradiction handling:**
   - If evidence conflicts (or L4 synthesis reports conflicts), present both sides and ask which policy to apply.

### Example Tool Calls

```json
{"min_ciar": 0.6, "max_turns": 20, "max_facts": 10, "format": "text"}
```

```json
{"query": "container MAEU1234567 ETA Friday 17:00", "min_ciar": 0.7, "limit": 20}
```

## Guardrails (Non-Negotiable)

- Do not “fill in” missing evidence with plausible-sounding details.
- Do not broaden retrieval aggressively (avoid large, low-signal context blocks).

## Failure Modes and Fallback

- If tier tools fail: fall back to `memory_query` with a small limit (5–10).
- If retrieval is consistently empty: treat the task as “no memory available” and proceed using user-provided information only.

From maksim-tsi/yet-another-agents-memory, MIT.

More from maksim-tsi/yet-another-agents-memory

Signals

Stars
0
Forks
0
Open issues
0
Last commit (this folder)
Feb 20, 2026 (8 months ago)

From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).

Details

License
MIT
First seen
Oct 24, 2026
Last checked
Oct 24, 2026

More from maksim-tsi

Done for you

Rather not set it up yourself?

Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.

See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies

Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.

launches shipped
50+
launches shipped
media placements
500+
media placements
founders on every account
2
founders on every account

Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block

Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.

Get Retrieval-Reasoning Gap Mitigation running in your business

Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.

Goes to the Chalk Labs founders, not the newsletter. Privacy

Need help deploying Retrieval-Reasoning Gap Mitigation?

CallGet help
Cite this page

Retrieval-Reasoning Gap Mitigation skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/maksim-tsi-retrieval-reasoning-gap-mitigation (last updated 2026-10-24)