Chalk Labs
Need help deploying codebase-design?
Chalk Labs sets up agents like this inside real teams: connected to your tools, tested on your data, with a human in the loop where it matters.
Install
Works with Claude Code, Claude apps, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, OpenCode, Goose, Windsurf. Read the repository before you give any tool access to your data.
npx agentmarket install skill/luizomf-codebase-design
Asks which of your tools to add it to (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Claude Desktop) and shows the change first. See https://agentmart.dev/cli.
Get the weekly diff
The weekly diff: one email a week with new agent tools, notable updates and grade changes, plus security alerts for tools you follow. Double opt-in, one-click unsubscribe.
About
Use cases: design
Reviews
Write a reviewNo reviews yet. Installed it? Reviews come from verified installers only. How reviews work
Permissions
What this skill can do and what it asks for, from its SKILL.md and code. Checked Oct 26, 2026.
- Tools
- No tools found
- Secrets
- None asked for
- Install scripts
- None found
Network hosts it talks to 1
codeload.github.com· found in install command
Files it touches
~/.claude/skills/codebase-design
What's inside
- Skill name
codebase-design- Description
- Design or improve deep modules. Use when shaping a module interface, deepening modules, placing a seam, reducing coupling, designing for testability, or when another skill requires the deep-module vocabulary.
- License
- MIT
- Instructions
- 105 lines in SKILL.md · view on GitHub
Files (3)
- DEEPENING.md
- DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md
- SKILL.md
SKILL.md (first lines)
# Codebase Design
Design **deep modules**: modules whose callers can exercise multiple required behaviors through a smaller interface at a defined seam. Apply the terms and rules below when designing or restructuring code. The target outcomes are leverage across callers, locality of changes and defects, and tests that use the same interface as production callers.
## Glossary
Use these architecture terms as defined here. Do not substitute `component`, `service`, `API`, or `boundary`, because those words identify different or narrower concepts.
**Module** — any unit with exactly one interface and an implementation, including a function, class, package, or tier-spanning slice. This term does not imply scale. Avoid `unit`, `component`, and `service` for this concept.
**Interface** — every fact a caller must know to use a module correctly: type signatures, invariants, ordering constraints, error modes, required configuration, and performance characteristics. `API` and `signature` name only part of this surface.
**Implementation** — code inside a module. Use **adapter** instead when discussing the role a concrete implementation fills at a seam. Implementation size and adapter size are independent; for example, a Postgres repository can be a small adapter with a large implementation, while an in-memory fake can be a large adapter with a small implementation.
**Depth** — behavior a caller or test can exercise relative to the interface facts it must learn. A module is **deeper** than an alternative when it preserves required behavior while exposing fewer methods, parameters, invariants, ordering constraints, error modes, configuration requirements, or performance obligations. It is **shallow** when callers must supply or coordinate the implementation's intermediate states and steps.
**Seam** _(Michael Feathers)_ — a location where behavior can be altered without editing code at that location. Seam placement and the behavior behind the seam are separate decisions. A seam may be internal to a module. Avoid `boundary`, which also refers to a DDD bounded context.
**Test seam** — a seam exposed through the caller-visible interface that production callers and behavior tests share. Tests may use a different adapter at that seam, but do not bypass the interface to reach an internal seam.
**Adapter** — a concrete module that satisfies an interface at a seam. The term identifies the role, not the implementation technology.
**Leverage** — reuse of behavior behind one interface across multiple callers or tests. A change behind the interface applies without reproducing the rule at each caller.
**Locality** — concentration of a behavior's code, required knowledge, defects, changes, and verification in one module rather than its callers.
## Deep and shallow modules
A deep module exposes a smaller interface than the behavior it contains:
```text
┌─────────────────────┐
│ Small Interface │ ← fewer caller-visible facts
├─────────────────────┤
│ │
│ Deep Implementation│ ← behavior hidden from callers
│ │
└─────────────────────┘
```
A shallow module exposes an interface that repeats most implementation decisions:
```text
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ Large Interface │ ← many caller-visible facts
├─────────────────────────────────┤
│ Thin Implementation │ ← forwards or rearranges inputs
└─────────────────────────────────┘
```
When comparing interface designs, check:
- whether multiple methods can become one operation without losing required behavior;
- whether the module can derive or own any current parameters;
- whether invariants, ordering, configuration, errors, or performance obligations can move behind the interface; and
- whether the reduced surface still supports every required caller and test behavior.
## Principles
- **Depth is a property of a module relative to its interface.** Internal composition does not make an external interface shallow. A module may use internal seams available only to its implementation and implementation-level tests while exposing one external seam to callers.
- **Deletion test.** Model deleting the module while preserving required behavior. If no caller must absorb rules or knowledge, the module was a pass-through. If rules or knowledge must be copied or coordinated across callers, the module provides locality or leverage. This is design evidence, not an automatic deletion rule: preserve required behavior and safety constraints, and judge total complexity and caller usability.
- **The interface is the test surface.** Production callers and behavior tests use the same test seam. A test that must bypass the interface is evidence that the interface does not expose required behavior or that the tested behavior belongs to another module.
- **Two justified adapters warrant a port.** Introduce a port only when at least two adapters are justified (typically production + test).
## Designing for testability
### Accept dependencies instead of constructing them inside the behavior
```typescript
// Dependency can vary at the seam.
function processOrder(order, paymentGateway) {}
// Dependency selection is coupled to this implementation.
function processOrder(order) {
const gateway = new StripeGateway();
}
```
### Return results instead of producing side effects
```typescript
// The result is observable without inspecting mutation.
function calculateDiscount(cart): Discount {}
// Verification requires observing mutation and hidden discount state.
function applyDiscount(cart): void {
cart.total -= discount;
}
```
### Minimize the caller-visible surface
A smaller caller-visible surface generally requires fewer tests and simpler setup.
## Rejected framings
- **Implementation-lines divided by interface-lines:** this metric can increase by adding implementation code without adding behavior. Evaluate depth by caller-visible facts and exercised behavior instead.
## Progressive references
- For deepening a cluster with known dependencies, read [DEEPENING.md](./DEEPENING.md) for dependency categories, seam discipline, and replace-don't-layer testing.
- For comparing alternative interfaces, read [DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md](./DESIGN-IT-TWICE.md) for the optional one-designer comparison process. Use it only when the invoking workflow authorizes that designer role and the current caller can dispatch a non-delegating leaf within its inherited depth. A non-delegating leaf resolves accepted sources directly or returns a blocker to its caller.
- To scan an entire repository for candidates, use [improve-codebase-architecture](../improve-codebase-architecture/SKILL.md). First run `cd '<loaded-skill-directory>' && pwd -P` with this loaded file's directory and resolve the link from that physical base. Read the target even when absent from discovery.From luizomf/omskills, MIT.
More from luizomf/omskills
- 0.609score
diagnosing-bugs
luizomf
Reproduction-first diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.604score
orchestrate
luizomf
Carry a bounded change through implementation, independent review, and verified delivery in the current conversation.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.604score
dispatch-tickets
luizomf
Coordinate a multi-issue Mission by tracking dependencies, responsible agents, blockers, and verified deliveries.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.604score
setup-omskills
luizomf
Configure repository instructions, issue-tracker operations, triage-label mappings, and domain-doc locations.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.604score
research
luizomf
Investigate a bounded question or produce a durable cited research artifact.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
wayfinder
luizomf
Plan work that exceeds one agent session as a shared map of investigation tickets, then resolve one ticket per session until the route to the destination is…
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
to-tickets
luizomf
Break a plan, spec, or conversation into tracer-bullet tickets with explicit blocking and conflict edges, then publish them to the configured tracker.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
triage
luizomf
Categorize and verify issues or external pull requests, then move them through configured triage states and record the applicable brief or notes.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
grill-with-docs
luizomf
Stress-test a repository plan or design through bounded Question rounds while updating domain terms and durable architecture decisions.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
code-review
luizomf
Review a committed range or complete work-in-progress candidate against repository standards and its governing contract.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
to-spec
luizomf
Synthesize the current conversation and repository context into a spec, then publish it to the configured issue tracker without a requirements interview.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.599score
resolving-merge-conflicts
luizomf
Resolves an in-progress git merge or rebase conflict by understanding each change's intent and preserving both where possible.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9
Signals
- Stars
- 3
- Forks
- 0
- Open issues
- 0
- Last commit (this folder)
- Oct 16, 2026 (14 days ago)
From GitHub (fetched Oct 24, 2026).
Details
- License
- MIT
- Repository
- github.com/luizomf/omskills
- First seen
- Oct 24, 2026
- Last checked
- Oct 24, 2026
- Source
- GitHubgithub-graphql
More from luizomf
- 0.609score
diagnosing-bugs
luizomf
Reproduction-first diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.604score
dispatch-tickets
luizomf
Coordinate a multi-issue Mission by tracking dependencies, responsible agents, blockers, and verified deliveries.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.604score
orchestrate
luizomf
Carry a bounded change through implementation, independent review, and verified delivery in the current conversation.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.604score
research
luizomf
Investigate a bounded question or produce a durable cited research artifact.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.604score
setup-omskills
luizomf
Configure repository instructions, issue-tracker operations, triage-label mappings, and domain-doc locations.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9 - 0.601score
code-review
luizomf
Review a committed range or complete work-in-progress candidate against repository standards and its governing contract.
SkillAFreshness: A★ 3Claude Code +9
Done for you
Rather not set it up yourself?
Chalk Labs scopes, builds and runs agents for your team: the task audit, the eval harness, the integrations and the weekly ops report. Fixed scope, priced before we start.
See how we build AI agents →Read the case studies
Chalk Labs is a two-founder AI and growth studio. We build AI agents, CRMs and MVPs for Web3 and AI companies, and have shipped 50+ product and token launches.
- launches shipped
- 50+
- launches shipped
- media placements
- 500+
- media placements
- founders on every account
- 2
- founders on every account
Press we've placed: Forbes · CoinDesk · Decrypt · Cointelegraph · The Block
Rahil Jain, Co-founder, Chalk Labs. Ex-Goldman Sachs engineer. You talk to the person who builds it.
Get codebase-design running in your business
Tell us what you want to automate. A founder replies within one working day with a plan, not a pitch deck.
Cite this page
codebase-design skill. Agent Mart. https://agentmart.dev/skills/luizomf-codebase-design (last updated 2026-10-24)